960
Comments (63)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
hloblart 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn't that 20 per 100,000 over the population as a whole, not the number of people who develop it over a shortish period, such as when the trial took place?

1
gromenawer 1 point ago +1 / -0

20 in 100.000 is the population as a whole yes. That paper that I linked about Bell's palsy is from 2005, way before corona was a thing.