The beauty of this suit is that the law is disputed (ha!), not the facts. Facts are easily verifiable. I believe there will be very little time spend on evidence and much on the law issues. Namely, if unlawful behavior of the individual states in terms of their election laws injures Elector Clause of the federal constitution.
That's the polar opposite, BTW, to the Wood/Powell cases, where the whole burden is on proving the fact of fraud. We can all see how that went.
Imagine SCOTUS ignoring a case that 19 states are in favor of
Execpt the Supreme Court did say they were going to hear it so idk what that asshole is smoking.
These people never heard of original jurisdiction, they're just virtue signalling by mocking the issue instead of analyzing it.
Multiple sources called this differently.
that didn't age well, Steve
HAHAHAHAHAHA OH BOY
The evidence is in writing, in the suit, they broke election laws and equality rules, no more evidence needed.
The beauty of this suit is that the law is disputed (ha!), not the facts. Facts are easily verifiable. I believe there will be very little time spend on evidence and much on the law issues. Namely, if unlawful behavior of the individual states in terms of their election laws injures Elector Clause of the federal constitution.
That's the polar opposite, BTW, to the Wood/Powell cases, where the whole burden is on proving the fact of fraud. We can all see how that went.