The beauty of this suit is that the law is disputed (ha!), not the facts. Facts are easily verifiable. I believe there will be very little time spend on evidence and much on the law issues. Namely, if unlawful behavior of the individual states in terms of their election laws injures Elector Clause of the federal constitution.
That's the polar opposite, BTW, to the Wood/Powell cases, where the whole burden is on proving the fact of fraud. We can all see how that went.
The beauty of this suit is that the law is disputed (ha!), not the facts. Facts are easily verifiable. I believe there will be very little time spend on evidence and much on the law issues. Namely, if unlawful behavior of the individual states in terms of their election laws injures Elector Clause of the federal constitution.
That's the polar opposite, BTW, to the Wood/Powell cases, where the whole burden is on proving the fact of fraud. We can all see how that went.