1004
Comments (53)
sorted by:
62
Mooma 62 points ago +62 / -0

Just a reminder that Kamalhead Harris has no biological children. Not adopted either, she's a stepmother to her husband's children. She came in to their life when they were teens or older (15-20yrs old). She never raise a child.

21
username_MAGA 21 points ago +22 / -1

Like Barry Soetoro, she is a CIA Farm Kid..

yes... the CIA raises and places our politicians, especially over the last 30 years.

Ryan, Flake, Swalwell, Buttigieg

ALL of THEM

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
username_MAGA 8 points ago +9 / -1

Much of it is familial and bloodline related, and not limited to politics. Some go into music and others into business, academia and Hollywood, depending on their talents.

1
Jabron661 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is how they get gatekeepers into positions of influence. You would be shocked how little in the way of bribery it takes to get people to play along and assist with giving these "chosen kids" a leg up and legitimacy.

And once they have a gatekeeper in a high position, the entire organization can be rebuilt from the inside out.

This is how they have managed to worm their way into running so many media corporations now. They use the distraction of social justice to force companies to hire people from certain backgrounds, then once they reach critical mass in a company, they take over and there is no one left to resist them, yes, almost like a virus.

They use their propaganda to lure people in who just think they are joining the "good guys", low info and easily manipulated people who cling to this as it gives them what they think is the moral high ground and membership into the "smart people" group, although they didn't really earn it by "being smart" or "moral".

Make no mistake, they are playing the long game, and we have entered the end game, if Trump had not upset the apple cart at the last minute, they would have already accomplished their goal of shattering America from the inside out.

Now is not the time to flinch or waver.

40
FORMERCHILDSTAR 40 points ago +41 / -1

It's common among these tyrannical drones to be childless and self absorbed. Pathetic creatures looking for meaning in their hallow lives. They will die alone on the ash pile of history.

3
KickingPugilist 3 points ago +4 / -1

They happen to. I don't have kids either and I likely won't, but that doesn't de facto make me uncompassionate.

And scumbag narcissists have children sometimes and treat them like shit.

3
Fabius 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have no idea.

You just don't. Your whole perspective changes in ways you can't understand. Not a knock, just the truth.

2
operatorstorm712 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or they desperately hope for a way to achieve immortality.

30
debacle 30 points ago +30 / -0

They're all nihilists. It's terrifying. I'm glad we have a President that FUCKS.

19
Gooseontheloose 19 points ago +19 / -0

Not only fucks, but fucks a supermodel.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
5
WU_HAN_FRU 5 points ago +5 / -0

And TALL citizens!

4
Whosaidwhatnow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump is so full of pride when he mentions Baron's height.

19
Lions4Trump 19 points ago +20 / -1

Childless managed decline, 'tis the European way!

5
bigdickhangsright 5 points ago +6 / -1

Hey, man, that socialism and nihilism taking hold isn't going to proliferate itself!

7
BlackLabsMatter 7 points ago +13 / -6

May i make a simple request that you please not do this? I have no kids, and if i were in a position similar to those you have spotlighted, I would guess I would sound a lot like you do. Not having children does not make one a monster, not does it make one unaware of the abuse heaped on kids in government schools and other places. Knowing that liberty is good and vital to the people of this nation does not require children.

8
operatorstorm712 8 points ago +8 / -0

There is a huge difference between people who cannot or don't have children/marriage and go about their lives and people who cannot/don't and want to take out their personalities on everyone.

You're cool; their monsters.

4
MountainViolinist 4 points ago +5 / -1

Nothing wrong with not having kids. I don't have any. However, I do agree with people who say don't vote for politicians that don't have kids. They don't have sufficient skin in the game.

3
Whosaidwhatnow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trudeau has lots of kids and he's worse than those pictured, except Merkel.

3
MountainViolinist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok? Shitty people have kids too.

But I still don't want to vote for someone with no kids.

3
zillat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah but you are based, and these people are self absorbed asshats. The issue isn't that one person doesn't have kids and has an opinion, it's that there is a movement of people that don't have kids and are pushing to subjugate future generations!

3
Habadeedah 3 points ago +4 / -1

Some couples opt to devote their time and energy into their careers. When you work 10+ hours a day, there's little time to adequately devote to your kids. I imagine these politicians felt the same way...they're just cucked for other reasons. Merkel didn't need to be a Muslim to make bad immigration policy.

3
ringobingo 3 points ago +4 / -1

Childless patriot here, I agree. My husband and I never wanted kids, but we would fight and die for this country and for our friends' kids. I’m not less of a woman or less of a patriot because I didn’t want kids.

6
CzechPede 6 points ago +6 / -0

Johnson is the British PM, not May.

6
Gooseontheloose 6 points ago +6 / -0

Two cheeks of the same asshole

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Barthaneous 4 points ago +5 / -1

Just like the Bible clearly states that a priest or Bishop or Deacon MUST be a man with one wife and have kids to show the rest of the body of God that if he can control his own household then he can lead the children of God . But if he doesn't have kids how can he show himself to be approved?

Catholic church denies this part of openly clear scripture and has allowed fruitless and unmarried and sometimes homosexual men to lead God's people for centuries . This is why all the sodomy and pedophilia is so now clear and open in the church.

It's time our laws should mirror this quality of traits so that true family men and women will have to risk their own children's lives by every horrible law or policy they wish to instill on the people .

3
arentbaby 3 points ago +4 / -1

people without kids, who don't own land-- aka zero stake in the country-- should not be allowed to hold office. I don't care if you're infertile

3
asdf1234567 3 points ago +3 / -0

And now look at Trump, i think he has 10 GRANDCHILDREN

3
Smurfection 3 points ago +3 / -0

The people least invested in the future prospects of the European nations, are leading their nations. If they didn't even bother continuing their own legacies through children, why would they care about the future of anyone else's?

3
zillat 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a common theme, agitated communists, single women 30's and 40's without hope of having any kids worried about the future for some reason (yet they have no future). People with kids should get a extra vote for each child they have, we could tie it to the person claiming the child exemption.

-1
arentbaby -1 points ago +1 / -2

Family units count as one vote

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
zillat 1 point ago +1 / -0

I deliberately will not tell liberal friends to hurry up and have kids for this reason..., it's sad, but necessary, let them figure it out themselves...

2
jiujiujiu 2 points ago +2 / -0

Massive red flags here.

2
Dev404 2 points ago +3 / -1

To be fair, there are plenty of officials with kids who are betraying our country as well. Brian Kemp, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Obama (supposedly), Gavin Newsom, Pat Toomey, etc. The popular thought is that people with kids are trying to leave behind a better future while childless officials have nothing to lose and don't care so they get what they can while they can. The corruption is present regardless of having kids, I believe. In fact, having a family also presents another point of attack for your enemies so they threaten and even kill at times to get their message across. Families are great and can steel your resolve, don't get me wrong, but can be used as leverage against someone just as easily. Not everyone will put America first if it means endangering their own families. In fact, some are more bold because they are on their own and free to act accordingly.

2
DerAlterAmAltar2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's hard to have kids when you marry someone old enough to be ur mum @ macron

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DwellerMike 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's like that as kids theyre groomed and go to evil school. Part of the deal is no kids. No family means you can be controlled. No strong emotional attachment.

1
HeavenlyTrumpets 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you.

1
Bigdickboi 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know that they can't be thinking of their country's future past their own lifespan. Literally can't think about leaving me a better country for their children

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Vadernocturnus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Literally un-fuckable.

1
Bigdickboi 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder why their country is struggling with birth rates so much...

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
0
TruthVelocity 0 points ago +1 / -1

Zombie leaders.