Did y'all catch the part where AG Paxton said that states have the ability to directly sue each other in the SCOTUS because the only option would be to go fight each other? That's the quiet part people are glossing over. If there's no way to get a full hearing in SCOTUS with evidence presented, there's only one option left.
Clown World has reached levels like no one ever believed it could.
We've got reddit arguing for state's rights. The irony is that the only time in which federalism is justified is when they finally give a shit about states making their own choices.
I mean if they don't hear it and I'm texas I refuse to recognize this congress and this president and any law passed by them. That's the point where the left learns that every law is ultimately enforced at the end of a gun.
Honest question, and it's a shitty question... If we think liberals hate other Americans enough to go to war and kill them, what makes us think they won't use things like drones and nuclear bombs?
They are more violent and aggressive than conservatives. Antifa and BLM showed what the left will do and conservatives did not respond. The left routinely threatens and kills whistleblowers and people who talk poorly of big government and big pharma and all of their allies.
That's why they rely on propaganda victories. They attack women, children, and elderly in order to illicit a response from people on the right then claim victim status. Whenever they get into a real fight they loose.
Liberals are "useful idiots" as the Soviet defector, and former communist propagandist, Yuri Bezmenov once said.
Unfortunately, I just heard a rumor in the last 24 hours that Trudeau has invited soldiers from China to conduct training exercises in Canada...
Edited to add: Now I'm hearing these rumors about Chinese soldiers in Canada are way overblown / not accurate. What a fucking waste of our time, with official news agencies spinning this crap...
Haven't the Clinton and Obama administrations shown that they are quite good at bombing people? IF there is conflict, I was assuming some of the military would take one side, some the other.
I personally live in an area where I'm not too worried about it but depending on the environment in your area you could maybe make one. I recently learned how to make a bow and arrow in case of food shortages. Obviously not as good as a gun but it's better than nothing and has reusable ammo.
Lol well I meant if you live in a woody area or own land or anything :P we have a little bit of land with a good amount of trees. We have a gun with only a little ammo. Bow and arrow isn't as powerful but still a decent option
States are free to handle their own election process.
States are NOT free to violate the Constitution and Equal Protection. The Texas AG gave an example where a State might place ballot collection boxes everywhere with no proper chain of custody. Can't do that.
Texas had a limited number of ballot boxes: 1 per county, per the Governor's order.
But, these "boxes" weren't simply on a street corner. The ballot must be presented to a poll worker, along with their identification. It must also be delivered by the voter, and not anyone else.
Historically, only about 3-4% of Texans vote absentee, because the law limits it to a handful of cases. "Over 65" is the largest group. For everyone else, being "out of the county" is only acceptable if you are out of the county for the entire early voting period (normally 2 weeks, but 3 weeks this year).
Democrats tried to expand eligibility this year, but failed. I'm unable to reference the percentage of absentee vote-by-mail info for 2020, as the data I downloaded just before the election is no longer available and hasn't been moved to the historical archive. But, I found that the percentage of mail-in voters increased to about 10% this year.
I should point out that is 10% of early voters. Normally, that would mean about 5% of all voters voted by mail, because about half of Texans vote on Election day. But, 2020 was an outlier in that respect: only 13% voted on Election Day this year.
No, that's not at all what they're suggesting. In fact, it's quite the opposite. They're saying that these other states need to play by the same constitutional rules that everyone else has played by. Them not doing so has disenfranchised every other state because a state or small group of states can then literally dictate how a federal-level election turns out by just manipulating rules however they see fit.
TX is saying that it's not fair that THEY conducted a fair election while the 4 States in question did not. Thus, these 4 states playing clown games disenfranchises the TX voters who actually made their voices heard... versus 4 states flooded with fraudulent ballots.
TX is, as I understand it, calling their bluff and demanding they prove that their elections were conducted fairly. But all signs point to no, as these states seemingly violated the Constitution to begin with.
Federal elections require that each state conduct their elections fairly. State legislatures are given the power to make their rules, and so long as those rules are adhered to then regardless of how annoying or stupid the rules are, it ensures the idea of a fair election.
If states do not adhere to the rules or change the process without doing so through the legislature (who would need to follow their own established processes), then it has the effect of disenfranchising all of the other states because federal elections involve all 50 of them.
The lawsuit is claiming that because the states in the lawsuit did not follow the procedures they were supposed to follow, and because those broken procedures lead to irregularities, to validate their reported results would be an offense to the states who followed their own rules.
Its not arguing that states can't function independently or that one state should dictate another. It's simply calling out the fact that the states establish their own rules for how to constitutionally alter election rules, that these states did not do so, and that as a result, they cannot be treated the same way as the states who followed the rules.
I think Bill should have been leading a lot more of those questions since he is a lawyer and can get many more insightful questions from the AG… but Crowder wanted his voice to be LOUD like the title says so that’s what we got :/
Yeah Crowder often makes fun at others expense and I think honestly its just his way of trying to be quick witted for the show. Its annoying to. E too which is why I'm not a hard-core fan.
YouTube was hiding this stream ... I could not find it by searching on the channel page, on my notifications and on subscriptions. It's bizarre that conservatives are allowing themselves to be ERASED by evil companies like google.
Google is just the gatekeeper.. the money lenders that fuel the globalist corporation advertisers is who are calling the shots on who to ban and censor.
Google is fuel by ad dollars and other marketing data bullshit. If no globalist corporations need any of that anymore, Google is gone. Unneeded.
Did Crowder ask him what he meant when he told Maria Bartiromo this morning that we can live with on instance where voter fraud happened and that future elections are the goal?
Just called AG Josh Stein here in NC to implore him to intervene in General Paxton's Texas suit, inspired by this post and all Pedes. Thanks for posting this!
All the above, plus we have a very strong agriculture industry. If any state went their own way, Texas would probably be in the best position to do so.
This is just my interpretation but it might have to do with the president’s lawyers and others states intervening in the lawsuit. There will be additional parties officially representing the case
People who see all of the corruption and say that they do not want to get involved in government are exactly the people who could try to make a change but instead back down. That's exactly why he should and why he called out people who call for change but just talk on internet forums about banding together.
He reference people making civil war declarations. Between the devilish smiles and the tongue in cheek statement regarding message board keyboard warriors.....
Sounded to me like he plans to put his money where his mouth is, in order to protect the constitution. Lone wolf style....
I think it's tough for some to adjust to different styles. He's very different from traditional medias in some ways but I, for one, aint gonna complain bout that.
I think it's just really cool that there's an independent media option out there that beats out MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and NBC in ratings (and very close to CNN!!) where people can come on and get interviewed without getting attacked by activist reporters.
I love that the biggest dweeb elected in our fucking government is the only who got caught fucking a Chinese spy. Shouldn’t shock anyone he was the one who was targeted.
Ron White was my favorite of the Blue Collar crew because he crafted a story with each of his bits.
The closest thing he had to a catchphrase was “They call me Tater Salad” and that was part of a 10 minute bit instead of a random non-sequitur like “Git R Dun”
Hfe’s a riot. As far as the rest of that troupe—I don’t always need my comedy/entertainment to be sophisticated. I just need it to be clever, and enjoyable. They made me laugh. I take a trip each Christmas time to Branson—Capital of Corny Jokes and Hillbilly Country costumes. They ask Veterans to stand up and be applauded at every show, don’t hurt anyone, praise God and America, and it’s just kind of nice for a few days to be around.
I'm going to say within 5 minutes of him mentioning the new rule, or of any mention of the election that isnt "Biden is our President".
I'm going to doubt the AG makes it on unless they start the show with the AG...if they cut if off while the AG is discussing it... that will be an AMAZING mistake.
I hate beck and just bought my blaze subscript. He sold out to msnbc/fox/everyone in the old days so The blaze imo is 5 years from being liquidated but RN steven crowded is doing more work than any journalist I know about election fraud.
They are driving to fake addresses in Georgia next
Correct, Crowder asked AG how many states may join amicus today, and Crowder said "It's safe to assume 4 minimum, 10 maximum?" and AG agreed that sounds reasonable although he can't name specific states, as they can still decide not to (but it's likely to be between 4-10 today).
Did y'all catch the part where AG Paxton said that states have the ability to directly sue each other in the SCOTUS because the only option would be to go fight each other? That's the quiet part people are glossing over. If there's no way to get a full hearing in SCOTUS with evidence presented, there's only one option left.
Its not that they don't understand, they simply don't give a fuck. When is everyone going to realize this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Username relevant to current situation I see!
Clown World has reached levels like no one ever believed it could.
We've got reddit arguing for state's rights. The irony is that the only time in which federalism is justified is when they finally give a shit about states making their own choices.
🤡🤡🤡 HONKITY HONK HONK HONK 🤡🤡🤡
I mean if they don't hear it and I'm texas I refuse to recognize this congress and this president and any law passed by them. That's the point where the left learns that every law is ultimately enforced at the end of a gun.
Honest question, and it's a shitty question... If we think liberals hate other Americans enough to go to war and kill them, what makes us think they won't use things like drones and nuclear bombs?
They are more violent and aggressive than conservatives. Antifa and BLM showed what the left will do and conservatives did not respond. The left routinely threatens and kills whistleblowers and people who talk poorly of big government and big pharma and all of their allies.
So...
I mean...
That's why they rely on propaganda victories. They attack women, children, and elderly in order to illicit a response from people on the right then claim victim status. Whenever they get into a real fight they loose.
Liberals are "useful idiots" as the Soviet defector, and former communist propagandist, Yuri Bezmenov once said.
Unfortunately, I just heard a rumor in the last 24 hours that Trudeau has invited soldiers from China to conduct training exercises in Canada...
Edited to add: Now I'm hearing these rumors about Chinese soldiers in Canada are way overblown / not accurate. What a fucking waste of our time, with official news agencies spinning this crap...
Haven't the Clinton and Obama administrations shown that they are quite good at bombing people? IF there is conflict, I was assuming some of the military would take one side, some the other.
If SCOTUS doesn't take this case (or rule in Texas' favor), then we'll have hit the bottom of the 3rd box meaning there's only one box left to open...
On the docket =/= they will actually hear it.
Docket just means they'll look at it and decide if they want to hear it.
18+ states makes me think it has a good chance of being heard but IANAL, and someone who is ANAL could probably inform me better
Then Texas leads the revolution I guess. I'd welcome Texan soldiers into PA if it comes to it
I regret not stocking up on ammo when I had the chance, just in case.
I personally live in an area where I'm not too worried about it but depending on the environment in your area you could maybe make one. I recently learned how to make a bow and arrow in case of food shortages. Obviously not as good as a gun but it's better than nothing and has reusable ammo.
I live in Florida surrounded by old people, what do I do? Lol
Start a cult and surround yourself with hordes of expendable followers.
This is best thing I've heard in a long time. Oh shit that made me laugh.
Q already did
Lol well I meant if you live in a woody area or own land or anything :P we have a little bit of land with a good amount of trees. We have a gun with only a little ammo. Bow and arrow isn't as powerful but still a decent option
Gross
Wouldn't be the first time TX went to war.
I dig this option highly
I hope history will remember Crowder and others that didn't say "let's move on"
Candace Owen
HEEEEY MAAAH! THEEE MEAAT LOAFF!
I was still listening to Ben Shapiro going into the election, but damn did he show his true colors after the election. Let me down.
Same here. His problem is he can look at data, get a 2, look at other date, get a 2. But he can never put 2 and 2 together.
Well you heard it here folks. If this case doesn't fly, basically, the constitution no longer matters.
States are free to handle their own election process. States are NOT free to violate the Constitution and Equal Protection. The Texas AG gave an example where a State might place ballot collection boxes everywhere with no proper chain of custody. Can't do that.
Texas had a limited number of ballot boxes: 1 per county, per the Governor's order.
But, these "boxes" weren't simply on a street corner. The ballot must be presented to a poll worker, along with their identification. It must also be delivered by the voter, and not anyone else.
This preserves the chain of custody.
This China Virus was used as an excuse to promote fraud with these Mail In Ballots.
90%+ of voters should have voted in person. The normal way. Where you sign in and present ID.
Instead, we have 50% of voters in these four corrupt states voting by Mail.With no proper verification.
Historically, only about 3-4% of Texans vote absentee, because the law limits it to a handful of cases. "Over 65" is the largest group. For everyone else, being "out of the county" is only acceptable if you are out of the county for the entire early voting period (normally 2 weeks, but 3 weeks this year).
Democrats tried to expand eligibility this year, but failed. I'm unable to reference the percentage of absentee vote-by-mail info for 2020, as the data I downloaded just before the election is no longer available and hasn't been moved to the historical archive. But, I found that the percentage of mail-in voters increased to about 10% this year.
I should point out that is 10% of early voters. Normally, that would mean about 5% of all voters voted by mail, because about half of Texans vote on Election day. But, 2020 was an outlier in that respect: only 13% voted on Election Day this year.
No, that's not at all what they're suggesting. In fact, it's quite the opposite. They're saying that these other states need to play by the same constitutional rules that everyone else has played by. Them not doing so has disenfranchised every other state because a state or small group of states can then literally dictate how a federal-level election turns out by just manipulating rules however they see fit.
TX is saying that it's not fair that THEY conducted a fair election while the 4 States in question did not. Thus, these 4 states playing clown games disenfranchises the TX voters who actually made their voices heard... versus 4 states flooded with fraudulent ballots.
TX is, as I understand it, calling their bluff and demanding they prove that their elections were conducted fairly. But all signs point to no, as these states seemingly violated the Constitution to begin with.
Federal elections require that each state conduct their elections fairly. State legislatures are given the power to make their rules, and so long as those rules are adhered to then regardless of how annoying or stupid the rules are, it ensures the idea of a fair election.
If states do not adhere to the rules or change the process without doing so through the legislature (who would need to follow their own established processes), then it has the effect of disenfranchising all of the other states because federal elections involve all 50 of them.
The lawsuit is claiming that because the states in the lawsuit did not follow the procedures they were supposed to follow, and because those broken procedures lead to irregularities, to validate their reported results would be an offense to the states who followed their own rules.
Its not arguing that states can't function independently or that one state should dictate another. It's simply calling out the fact that the states establish their own rules for how to constitutionally alter election rules, that these states did not do so, and that as a result, they cannot be treated the same way as the states who followed the rules.
I think Bill should have been leading a lot more of those questions since he is a lawyer and can get many more insightful questions from the AG… but Crowder wanted his voice to be LOUD like the title says so that’s what we got :/
Yeah Crowder often makes fun at others expense and I think honestly its just his way of trying to be quick witted for the show. Its annoying to. E too which is why I'm not a hard-core fan.
Yeah it’s pretty cringey most of the time and you can tell in their responses a lot of the time they’re not impressed.
Really? I don't get that at all from their responses really because they'll just snap back at him later on or make jokes later on.
Drives me absolute nuts. He’ll never stop.
YouTube was hiding this stream ... I could not find it by searching on the channel page, on my notifications and on subscriptions. It's bizarre that conservatives are allowing themselves to be ERASED by evil companies like google.
He kinda said yesterday that his lawyer is ripping YT a new one. They are fighting, a lot of people are, it’s just not being reported on MSM.
Half Asian lawyer*
Half Asian Lawyer
HAL
HAL 9000
Hahaha, oh man, never thought of that! Clever!
Yes, my apologies.
Join Mug Club or quit bitching.
We have to pay to stay free
Ha ! You can't shame me, I am a MugClubber for over a year ! ;)
Google is just the gatekeeper.. the money lenders that fuel the globalist corporation advertisers is who are calling the shots on who to ban and censor.
Google is fuel by ad dollars and other marketing data bullshit. If no globalist corporations need any of that anymore, Google is gone. Unneeded.
Keep the pressure on your local AG's, pedes. Even the Texas AG asked you to do so.
we need to keep the ones left to do, as asticky
Did Crowder ask him what he meant when he told Maria Bartiromo this morning that we can live with on instance where voter fraud happened and that future elections are the goal?
I didn't catch that remark. That's concerning.
Was on maria bartiromo same morning
Just called AG Josh Stein here in NC to implore him to intervene in General Paxton's Texas suit, inspired by this post and all Pedes. Thanks for posting this!
There might be a more cucked AG in the nation
Agreed.
Texas should send infinity + 1 electors to the electoral college if they lose this case.
Texan here. Exactly, it means states no longer have to follow the rules of the constitution. Just do whatever the hell we want... a free for all.
I would think Texas would do nicely in a free for all, yeah?
Aren’t you guys energy independent, financially stable, and probably have a crap load of privately owned firearms?
All the above, plus we have a very strong agriculture industry. If any state went their own way, Texas would probably be in the best position to do so.
Armed to the teeth themselves and surrounded by the rest of us and our firearms we share on Sunday gunday.
Kind of what I was thinking. If they get to ignore the Constitution, do the same and send a message.
Is it just me or when he said that his role in the fight might be changing, was he hinting that he might be considering a run for office
This is just my interpretation but it might have to do with the president’s lawyers and others states intervening in the lawsuit. There will be additional parties officially representing the case
That’s also very possible too
I joined Mug Club. Crowder is worth $69/yr and watch on Blaze TV. F-YT.
only $69? Sale?
It's the election sale because the election isn't over! I think it's promo code CrowderElectionStream
Damn, this is a spicy episode
Is he hinting he's going to run for office?
Sounded like it but I don't know why he would. If election fraud is allowed en-masse he'd never get elected.
People who see all of the corruption and say that they do not want to get involved in government are exactly the people who could try to make a change but instead back down. That's exactly why he should and why he called out people who call for change but just talk on internet forums about banding together.
He reference people making civil war declarations. Between the devilish smiles and the tongue in cheek statement regarding message board keyboard warriors.....
Sounded to me like he plans to put his money where his mouth is, in order to protect the constitution. Lone wolf style....
Or Joe Rogan? Sort of reminds me of that except he is younger
Crowder can seamlessly go from the absolute dumbest jokes (which I love) to the best in depth distillations of complex politics.
And Pogo is bomb.
I think it's tough for some to adjust to different styles. He's very different from traditional medias in some ways but I, for one, aint gonna complain bout that.
His show gets me laughing out loud, which as you rightly pointed out, I really need these days.
And not as roided and subversive as Rogan
Rogan wanted Bernie to win
Rogan is a cuck who wanted Bernie to win.
I think it’s adorable how giddy half Asian Bill Richman was to talk about this with AG Paxton and to talk about this in general. Haha
I think it's just really cool that there's an independent media option out there that beats out MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and NBC in ratings (and very close to CNN!!) where people can come on and get interviewed without getting attacked by activist reporters.
Crowder gets better ratings than those MSM?
I've watched some CNN interviews. The anchors immediately get hostile once the narrative barely shifts of line.
So, this sounds an aweful lot like Crowder is planning to run for office.
I love that the biggest dweeb elected in our fucking government is the only who got caught fucking a Chinese spy. Shouldn’t shock anyone he was the one who was targeted.
Is he married? If she was a Chinese spy there must be sex tapes.
Watching both, but I prefer Crowder's style over Bannon's - Crowder seems more on point.
Crowder’s show feels less like a pledge a thon
Both crowder and bannon are narcissistic, but crowder at least has some self awareness.
Bannon comes across as overly self important.
I agree, I know ego fuels a lot a people who can do great things, and there can be downsides as well.
Good show today!!
Can’t wait until the investigate in person the addresses of some NV fraudulent votes next week haha
Picked up a blazeTV subscription last night.
Try Chad Prather’s show. He’s like based Ron White. If you don’t find Ron White entertaining, never mind. 😎
Ron White was my favorite of the Blue Collar crew because he crafted a story with each of his bits.
The closest thing he had to a catchphrase was “They call me Tater Salad” and that was part of a 10 minute bit instead of a random non-sequitur like “Git R Dun”
Hfe’s a riot. As far as the rest of that troupe—I don’t always need my comedy/entertainment to be sophisticated. I just need it to be clever, and enjoyable. They made me laugh. I take a trip each Christmas time to Branson—Capital of Corny Jokes and Hillbilly Country costumes. They ask Veterans to stand up and be applauded at every show, don’t hurt anyone, praise God and America, and it’s just kind of nice for a few days to be around.
Does it have a “coopon”? 🥸
Love that Crowder is calling out the damn RINOs
When the journalists become clowns, our clowns become journalists.
Clown world 2020
HONK HONK
How long til he gets yeeted due to the new censorship?
They booted him once and half Asian Bill Richmond got him back on.
I'm going to say within 5 minutes of him mentioning the new rule, or of any mention of the election that isnt "Biden is our President".
I'm going to doubt the AG makes it on unless they start the show with the AG...if they cut if off while the AG is discussing it... that will be an AMAZING mistake.
And he went with the AG right out the gate! Lets see if YouTube shuts them down...
bring it ... audience will follow him just like we ditched reddit
1 day
No I mean how long into this mornings stream. I'm accepting measurements in minutes.
First time I’ve seeming that crazy witch’s video.
How was she not arrested besides being a democrat?
She is being disciplined for that video, fortunately. But you're right, she needs to be impeached.
Crap, I can't watch both this and the GA hearing at the same time.
This is better
When you go back to watch this, AG Paxton is doing a great job explaining his lawsuit
And it's very short.
Cynthia "RuPaul" Jones 🤣
Won't Youtube remove this for claiming Glorious Leader Biden didn't win
Yes I forgot to say, SECTION 230 YouTube
Don't forget to send his son the signed gift package!
Stephen should not do these shows up against hearings.
God bless Texas and General Paxton! And congrats on the new grandbaby!
Edit: This guy is based.
BASED PEDE AG has joined the chat
4 or 5 States actually joining in just backing it!!!
Also there’s free cable like stuff out there!
I watch Pluto.tv and Tubi Tv all the time haha
Is there a Crowder channel on Pluto?
There’s a BlazeTV, not sure if he is on it. Glenn Beck is on there now
Thank you!
So there’s a promo code that supposedly still works: #electionlivestream ? Might not have the hashtag.
With the code it’s $70 for the year and they do have monthly subs.
I listen to Mark Levin too. So I would say it’s not too bad. I waste my money in less entertaining ways haha
I hate beck and just bought my blaze subscript. He sold out to msnbc/fox/everyone in the old days so The blaze imo is 5 years from being liquidated but RN steven crowded is doing more work than any journalist I know about election fraud.
They are driving to fake addresses in Georgia next
I’m on Brave with ublock origin and express vpn
I think the Blaze sub is worth it. It has Crowder plus some Eric July, who I am a fan of even if he isn’t MAGA
VERY DISRESPECTFUL
Th Texas AG explained that there is a huge difference between FRIEND of the Court and INTERVENING.
He wishes that these 18 States had the balls to INTERVENE. They did not. They only joined as FRIENDS.
Not one State has INTERVENED.
I love the Winnie the Pooh Bear song for those who listen on Blaze
Will YouTube shut him down midstream? Watch and find out!
minimum of 4, maximum of 10 TODAY O_O
Correct, Crowder asked AG how many states may join amicus today, and Crowder said "It's safe to assume 4 minimum, 10 maximum?" and AG agreed that sounds reasonable although he can't name specific states, as they can still decide not to (but it's likely to be between 4-10 today).
Crowder and Paxton said that more states are for sure going to join the lawsuit. 4 or 10 were the numbers of thrown out.
beat me to it <3
Is YouTube going to shut this down? Let's see if we can call their bluff.
There's still 15 minutes to go until it kicks in and then the runover until it starts up but great to get this stickied earlier rather than later.
Four and a half thousand pedes waiting for it at this point. Let's kit 100K live viewing guys!
No way screw youtube. Mug club for me
Yeah..but blaze isnt HD. its kind of annoying like.. why is the shit i pay for only 720p? (unless they've changed it recently havent checked)
More eyes watching out in the open, more threatening for people to see the viewing numbers and know who they are up against.
Crowder getting it done!
I can't comment!!!! Anyone else seeing that YouTube took down their comment section?
I think when the livestream is over and published to his channel, that's when you can comment on the video
Thanks... I do watch many live streams on YT. apreesh the help.
Guy below is correct- you can comment afterwards on youtube, but he never has a live chat
OK cool, I thought the comments (Not the live chat) was always enabled. Wasn't aware he was talking about watching post-live. Thanks for the heads-up
Not chat, the actual comments. He keeps saying comment below and the section is gone.
Youtube will ban him for what you guys say. That’s why he disabled the live comment
That sentence is so sad to read.
So, you can't hold YouTube liable because of 230 but they think they can hold the creator liable for commenters?
3:00 PM EST (I would assume and you know what happens when you assume) SC decision on whether or not to hear the case?
3pm is the response deadline for the defendant states.
it sounds to me like there are a decent amount more than the 18 states signed on to this that we already know about!
Crowder is more of a journalist than ANY msm talking head will ever be.
Off he really is gonna go to NV to check out the home addresses of some of the fraudulent votes haha
You know what they say about guys with shoulder holster
Not enough room in their pants?
You could see 25 states in this when all is said and done! Hail mug club! https://youtu.be/Ab9zNml7eaU
Yes but we need our states to actually intervene in the lawsuit and not just as “friends of the court”
And we're live!
Thanks for listening Mods!
You are the best!