16
Comments (15)
sorted by:
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
sustainable_saltmine 4 points ago +4 / -0

in other words, he basically said , "fuck this election, let's just fix things for next time"

2
workingman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ohio AG pretending he can't read. Fire his dumb ass.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
TheOMBReport [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are asking for an answer which is something at least

2
Sammie 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the Ohio AG is asking SCOTUS to hear the Texas case, but to deny the relief Texas is asking for?

2
TheOMBReport [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

To hear the case and rule on Electors Clause, but does not formally support any of the proposed relief

2
Southern_Buckeye 2 points ago +2 / -0

OHIO 🇵🇷

2
Sammie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow. What a weasel.

2
superchump555 2 points ago +2 / -0

De-WINERY Effect. Eye-Wash

1
SteveSanchez80 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are really asking to not hear the case more than anything.

2
CherokeePede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yost is bought and paid for....and useless. Most likely asked a staffer to write this up and send it to look like he did SOMETHING

1
TheOMBReport [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are asking for an answer which is something at least

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

First state to join the Demonrats then

1
TheOMBReport [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not really. They want an answer to one of the Texas questions