781
Comments (131)
sorted by:
108
Trump_da_g0d 108 points ago +114 / -6

Fortunately, GEOTUS is smarter than 4chan.

39
CivilWarrior [S] 39 points ago +41 / -2

I think this is plausible, but not gonna disagree with that ;-D

51
deleted 51 points ago +54 / -3
16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
5
Bongshapiro 5 points ago +5 / -0

They don't need to disgrace Biden on the way out. The NeoLibCons Ive always known just do what they please. This is still a LARP but that part of it makes sense

4
IntrepidBurger 4 points ago +5 / -1

They're talking about Hunter to proactively get ahead of it. You can't have Biden take the seat with the Hunter loose ends, way too potentially explosive if normies got wind of it.

FBI will do an investigation, give a the green light saying Hunter has a few tax issues that he'll pay fines on, but otherwise in the clear.

Of course, all of this discounts what Trump is doing to undermine them, but that was their plan.

3
SAW2TH 3 points ago +4 / -1

This.

Just like the FBI investigating Hillary - 5 minute investigation finds nothing, case closed. Move along.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
IntrepidBurger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. Great point on the media angle.

1
SnowflakeJuice 1 point ago +1 / -0

BINGO

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
7
LeftistsAreInsane 7 points ago +8 / -1

I don't buy it at all. Biden conceding? Yeah right.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
58
Roadrash 58 points ago +70 / -12

There is absolutely zero chance of this happening. SCOTUS isn’t even giving a ruling on who is POTUS, their ruling (in the events that they hear the case and rule in favor of Texas) will direct the state legislatures to seat whatever electors they wish (which they already have the power to do but are all chicken shit).

This is pure fantasy.

5
NazisWereSocialist 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t understand how that has anything to do with this, what you said can all be totally true without being in contradiction with this theory at all.

2
Roadrash 2 points ago +3 / -1

Biden isn’t going to concede based on a case where the remedy asked for is to have defendant states electors selected by the legislature, nor is SCOTUS hearing (possibly) a case asking for them to decide POTUS.

2
NazisWereSocialist 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s not what I’m alleging, I’m just saying if Trump has some aces up his sleeve through military intelligence or whatever, the best move would be to get Biden to admit guilt to avoid massive civil unrest

2
dixond 2 points ago +2 / -0

You've missed the point.

Biden concedes on the basis that GEOTUS is going to win a second term, and he will therefore face a firing squad for treason.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-38
deleted -38 points ago +7 / -45
21
S2Slayer 21 points ago +21 / -0

That would be a bad thing for them to do. On one hand you have 4 states that won't look into what appears to be blatant cheating. On the other you have 7 states claiming damages as the 4 states have not fallowed the same rules they did. All of these states have to accept the person elected as our president. If 4 break the rules why should the rest have to fallow suit?

The quickest way to Civil War is to call the election with tainted results or to drop votes in a way that benefits the other party. Forcing a new election with better controls to insure voter integrity would ease both sides. The way it is looking Democrats won't even let us investigate fraud let alone seek alternate methods of reminding this election.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
12
JohnCocktoastin 12 points ago +14 / -2

Shouldn't downvote this guy. The best counter argument to the Texas case is that an alternate remedy exists. The failure of the state legislatures to act is not a cause of action to bring to court. However, I believe the argument fails because Texas has no ability to get the other state legislatures to act, nor able to vote them out as a consequence of failing to act. Perhaps the best way to articulate this is that the existing remedy for Texas is more remote than the injury suffered.

13
BeefyBelisarius 13 points ago +13 / -0

There is no alternative remedy for legal disputes between state governments, aside from open warfare. Settling that sort of thing is literally one of the reasons the SC was created in the first place.

3
IntrepidBurger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct, the reason why SC has original jurisdiction on such matters.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't disagree. But Texas is asking SCOTUS to basically direct those legislatures. They could already act without a court order if they wanted to. Hence, an alternate remedy exists. What I think is compelling and will ultimately force action here is that a genuine question of exactly who the hell does have standing to litigate this type of crap? They've set up an uncontestable system at this point where nobody can challenge it. One can go the local route and try to get the same bird brains that enacted the skim to redress it, but that is a fool's errand.

1
1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

How well is it going to go for somebody arguing a constitutional case when the legislature itself is saying that people defending the suit are the ones that subverted their will?

0
ZS2020 0 points ago +0 / -0

What? I don’t get what your saying, but the point I’m trying to make here is that the Pennsylvania legislature sided with Texas on the lawsuit, that is very very good news for Texas no matter what way you look at it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
iamherefortheluls 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the issue is that the 4 states in question have made their own laws that prohibit legislature from doing so, which is the point of the suit.

By US constitution, they are allowed. By their own state's laws, they are not.

0
StableGenius9001 0 points ago +1 / -1

That is a good point. Didn't the PA legislators request the SC to decertify their states certification though? I agree that the legislators could've done something, if they actually cared. The fact that the executive branch of these states bypassed laws enacted by the legislators is hopefully enough basis for the SC to take the case. The fact that the legislators are impotent doesn't nullify the fact that the law was broken and voters in other states may have incurred injury.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
45
deleted 45 points ago +48 / -3
5
Rotting_John_McCain 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yep.

5
mintscape 5 points ago +6 / -1

It's not the FBI but the DOJ doing the investigation, it will not be cleared up in a few weeks either.

The investigation will be used to control Biden, having an obviously corrupt and compromised president is what the deep state aim for. They have huge leverage over him, just incase he maybe starts thinking on his own.

There is huge amounts of kompromat on the Biden's that's why the deep state selected him. Likewise Kamala is corrupt and can be handled the same way.

What the deep state hate about Trump is he isn't corrupt, there is so little dirt on him they have constantly had to make shit up. The swamp cannot control Trump so they stole the election to replace him.

5
mrs.rose 5 points ago +6 / -1

^^^ much more believable

1
NazisWereSocialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Biden investigation could be cover and this could still happen though.

1
Crappydatum 1 point ago +2 / -1

The FBLie knows how to do one thing VERY well. It's right there in their name. Lie

26
Trustnone 26 points ago +26 / -0

This would be great. The political left doesn't seem to make good decisions though.

14
undefined 14 points ago +14 / -0

this. They've weaponized the mentally I'll and targeted them against everything wholesome

They are drug addled degenerates who have been turned into literal demons

5
DaveMastor 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wasn't afraid of them during the summer, I'm not going to be afraid of them once Trump's kid gloves come off.

16
JiggsawCalrissian 16 points ago +18 / -2

I believe this is right about everything up until Bidens full unconditional concession and acknowledgement of Trump as the president/ telling his kids to not riot and loot.

If he were that honourable we would never have got to this point to begin with. He would have been openly against the summer of love for starters

Instead I think the scotus will rule in favour of trump and the left will abandone the scotus and declare some kind of independence, leading to an impotent civil war that will be over before it starts due to many heads a rollin behind the scenes

6
Wenger 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think it's unlikely but not impossible Biden concedes based on this. It isn't about his honor it's about saving his own skin.

2
Shalomtoyou 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that's the only reason I can see him doing it and even THAT is a stretch. Not impossible. But not good odds.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
2
iamherefortheluls 2 points ago +2 / -0

Occupy Wall Street was dismantled by the identity politics activists, taking advantage of the circumstance of normies who started that movement, needing to get back to work.

8
entwickelnden 8 points ago +8 / -0

I've mentioned it in my moments before. AND if Biden played it right, he could act like he is being the bigger man / DNC being the more "honorable" party by letting that meany Trump has his way. Either way DNC is gonna look corrupt or weak or both.

8
C0untR0ckula 8 points ago +8 / -0

the hunter investigation is definitely significant. i originally though HB getting scrutinized publicly was the MSM's way of trying to appear impartial & fair - now that the Election has already taken place - it can't hurt Hair Sniffer's chances at this point. I dunno 🤨

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
6
1ValhallaJack 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let it be so

2
BornAgainPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

At last, we will reveal ourselves to the libtards. At last, we will have revenge.

5
Hypothesis 5 points ago +6 / -1

Is there a name for these kinds of posts? Hope porn?

2
NoTimeToBleed 2 points ago +3 / -1

MAGAturbation?

5
Slingding 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm in favor of this outcome. After everyone forgets about the Biden family (2-months from now), a strange gas leak happens, a toilet overflows, who the hell knows or cares. Please give us 12+ more years of Trump policies to clean out this garbage existing in DC.

4
misterLahey 4 points ago +5 / -1

That sounds reasonable until the part about Biden giving a speech to say any of those things. That would be the most honorable way out, but he's an empty meat puppet and his masters will never take the honorable route since a domestic strife benefits them.

7
You_Aint_Black 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Bidens are self-interested, they're not ideologues. This is probably bullshit, but it's totally plausible bullshit.

4
UnmaskedPatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only way Biden uses those words is if he indeed is trying to avoid a firing squad or prison. A year in prison is as good as a death sentence for sleepy Joe.

3
deepbake 3 points ago +3 / -0

happening = not

3
F22-Raptor-007 3 points ago +5 / -2

99.9999999999999999% of everything posted on 4chan is bullshit, this included.

If any rioting happens if SC rules in favor of Texas, it will be in blue cities anyways, so who cares. Let them burn. There's no "king of the ashes". This sounds like someone who watched a few too may action movies.

Some blue cities will riot, NG may be called in, and as soon as those cucky soy boys see the big boy guns, they'll go back home to mommy's basement and just start slamming some chicken nuggets.

3
datboiforever 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've hoped from day 10 or so that this would happen. Regardless of who comes out on top, there will be rioting unless the leaders come out and concede. I think we all know from history that the leaders in war never concede from the start. I sadly see this ending with violence. Fortunately, our side is much better armed and more experienced.

3
edxzxz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oooh boy, that's some amazing fiction right there! Dems never do what's right for the country - they only do what gets them power. Is there some history of dems being held accountable or being prosecuted under the law which would entice them to do what's right to avoid the consequences? Come on, man!

3
Blurpy 3 points ago +3 / -0

This seems plausible, and I would take this outcome with a grin.

3
mattb11 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't buy it but would be awesome.

3
Hussar 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can totally imagine demands for street violence from clowns like Ocasio-Rakosi and that walking, talking Pepto Bismol bottle that answers to the name of "Rick Wilson", but the idea that Biden cut some kind of deal with Trump is silly.

First, Biden is already going through the motions of an "incoming president". He's also never once entertained the idea that his son did anything objectionable. On the contrary, he bragged about stamping out a Ukrainian investigation into Druggie McDrugface.

The grim reality is that the investigation into Druggie is more than likely designed to clear up his name. We'll probably hear sporadic reports of "we haven't found anything yet" over several months until they eventually shrug their shoulders and say that Druggie's business dealings are odd but not illegal or unethical. Druggie won't be going to prison (or even indicted) if Harris worms her way into the White House.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
LeftyTearsWillFlow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately I think a lot of us on the "right" project onto the "lefties" in regards to thinking they actually have some type of common sense or intelligence. These people simply have the personality where they argue no matter what. Even if they believe we were right, they would argue that we were wrong because they simply will never admit they are right. Unfortunately, as I have gotten older, it reminds me exactly of my mom. She would rather argue with you then admit she is wrong. My mom actually said to me the other day "How do you know the pictures of Nancy Pelosi without a mask on weren't old pictures?" I'm like, maybe because there was a FUCKING VIDEO of her telling people to come to Chinatown. Unfortunately the left is absolutely delusional and will never admit they are wrong.

3
NazisWereSocialist 3 points ago +3 / -0

GNews (the Chinese dissident news channel that exposed hunter biden laptop 3 weeks before it hit news here) has been claiming Biden will concede for a pardon

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
3
Saigunx 3 points ago +3 / -0

The ankle bracelet is probably true, Biden isn't above cutting a deal to save himself.

3
Trumpticusprime 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kind of makes sense considering the announcement that Hunter is under investigation... cant get a pardon unless your under investigation.

3
Cloudrdr 3 points ago +3 / -0

First step... Retake the "Radio Station".

That is, CLOSE DOWN ALL MONOLITHIC SOCIAL MEDIA, and ALL BROADCAST SERVICES.

Initiate Emergency Comms and start blasting truth and evidence.

Arrest all traitors and seditionists.

Miller Time.

2
meric_jar_mellon 2 points ago +3 / -1

And then, everybody clapped. Supermodels gather around me and hoisted me on their shoulders, each asking me to bear their children.

1
edxzxz 1 point ago +1 / -0

You left out that the supermodels rained hundred dollar bills down on you, and that their names were 'Albert Einstein'.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is like finding the winning powerball ticket in a home depot parking lot wedged in your front fender type of scenario. The only reason it is actually plausible is that (1) Biden didn't actually ever want to be president (2) Biden only gives a shit about himself and his family; has no loyalty to the cause or to the heads of the movement (3) is not going to be around much longer given what appears to be advanced dementia setting in.

2
I_Love_45-70_Gov 2 points ago +2 / -0

i think this is plausible, other than Biden speaking in complete, coherent sentences.

2
dixond 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, this lines up approximately with my thinking - the reintroduction of firing squads was leverage. It was intended to apply pressure. It is a negotiating tool. Who does GEOTUS most need to apply pressure to right now? Biden.

2
Bzmentor 2 points ago +3 / -1

Would be great if it happens that way...

2
Bert_Worthington 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do not think it will happen like stated. If it does, that would be a great way to end this. The forces and people behind this coup are not gona back down like that in my opinion.

2
henri_derelicte 2 points ago +3 / -1

Plausible, but the move to accelerate politically sensitive investigations isn’t unprecedented. The feds took action against Blago before Obama took office to prevent him from terminating the investigation. Obama’s goons pushed the false Russia investigation to cast a cloud over the incoming administration

2
Trumptastic88 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOOOOL this isnt anywhere close to reality. Not a single person cares what Joe Biden says.

2
RedPillDispenser 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hmm.. interdustin'

2
Dale_Gribble 2 points ago +2 / -0

that would be pretty crazy. Wouldnt mind if it happened

2
socal_maga_patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

"federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison".....

ROFLMAO

2
crash7863 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not realistic.

2
MyAuntFanny 2 points ago +2 / -0

For the good of the country, I wish this was true.

1
JoeTrump 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yea... Okay... Sure...

1
Skeeter_N_CO 1 point ago +2 / -1

Except the Hunter investigation is a stitch up. They are only acknowledging the investigation so they can clear him before Joe is inaugurated. Just like the Hillary email investigation.

1
mathteach314159 1 point ago +2 / -1

Now that is some larp porn if I have ever seen it!!

1
RedFoxOnFire 1 point ago +2 / -1

In order for this to be true, it would have to mean that Dems have honor and decency.

Unfortunately, that is not the case.

1
TheSwampsPlug 1 point ago +1 / -0

This would be probably the most civil way for it to go down, but until it happens i wont hold my breath

1
CyrusKingOfAnshan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't believe these people go down without a fight but I'm not sure it's a fight we'll see.

1
grndmrshlgando 1 point ago +2 / -1

this election is over on our terms. not traitor Joe's.

1
Formerlurker92 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'd love it, but don't buy it

1
Shalomtoyou 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhhhhh..... really having trouble imagining Biden saying that.

I mean, yeah, if that's how he avoids the firing squad, maybe....

.... but really having trouble.

1
Cloudrdr 1 point ago +1 / -0

He could always send Podesta out to make this """""concession """"

1
BigIslandFrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Joe: "Stay calm, do not protest and DO NOT burn the country in my name."

Camel-hoe: "Burn it."

Joe doesn't even know WTF is going on. Anyone who thinks that the Dems and the Left pay any attention to him is deluded.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1