16
Comments (13)
sorted by:
4
hazelknut 4 points ago +4 / -0

Texas seeks to invalidate elections in four states for yielding results with which it disagrees.

not because it disagrees. because they didn't follow the damn laws.

What Texas is doing in this proceeding is to ask this Court to reconsider a mass of baseless claims about problems with the election that have already been considered, and rejected, by this Court and other courts.

I missed that case.

Texas has not suffered harm simply because it dislikes the result of the election,...

again.

3
Cucumberbro 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I'm gonna need a lawyer pede lol

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Triiton 3 points ago +3 / -0

looks like were winning boys

1
hazelknut 1 point ago +1 / -0

the more i read, the more i think an angry high-schooler wrote this.

2
guns_and_butter 2 points ago +2 / -0

is that it?? not good for the defendants.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
blacksmith21 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm seeing that as well. The other 3 states have 10 minutes to file. What's interesting, is that it only references TX and not the other states who have joined officially. I'm still reading the doc.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
JoeTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

As I read it... ONLY PA has filed a response at this time.

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ok, so what does it lead to?

I'm really, REALLY unfamiliar with how all of this works

Does the Supreme Court has to act on this in any specific manner?

2
hazelknut 2 points ago +2 / -0

i think they will issue a statement regarding whether they will accept the case or not. probably tomorrow but maybe today because you know the thing.

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh, the thing!

Sure, it's all in the Trunalimunumaprzure Letters.