22 Ohio AG: I asked SCOTUS to rule on the Electors Clause question presented in Texas’s lawsuit. It is unconstitutional for judges and bureaucrats to change the rules set by state legislatures for selecting electors. (twitter.com) posted 126 days ago by lurkaholic 126 days ago by lurkaholic +22 / -0 4 comments share 4 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (4) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 3 ▼ – unexpectedbutthole 3 points 126 days ago +3 / -0 Meanwhile DeWine extends his unconstitutional CURFEW to January 2nd permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – CyrusKingOfAnshan 3 points 126 days ago +3 / -0 Except that isn't what he sad. He asked them to rule if the Electoral clause kept states from changing their own laws. Which is a loaded question (much like the TX lawsuit but that's by design) permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Fuckoffgoogle 3 points 126 days ago +3 / -0 It reads like double talk permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Ben45 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163367/20201210142206254_Pennsylvania%20Opp%20to%20Bill%20of%20Complaint%20v.FINAL.pdf Doesn't take a side but puts pressure on SCOTUS to take the case which is still important permalink save report block reply
Meanwhile DeWine extends his unconstitutional CURFEW to January 2nd
Except that isn't what he sad. He asked them to rule if the Electoral clause kept states from changing their own laws.
Which is a loaded question (much like the TX lawsuit but that's by design)
It reads like double talk
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163367/20201210142206254_Pennsylvania%20Opp%20to%20Bill%20of%20Complaint%20v.FINAL.pdf
Doesn't take a side but puts pressure on SCOTUS to take the case which is still important