Title says it all but, I just think that saying "hey get rid of 230" is good enough. So should I talk about YouTube's new guidelines or Twitter banning opposing opinions and blocking the president's Twitters? I don't want to sound like a idiot and I'm takin seriously. Also I'm a citizen of MO.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
You can argue that, yes. I would agree that you are correct.
The problem is that courts would have to also agree.
It's the unfortunate downside of being a nation of laws - we can't just hang people who we think (or even KNOW) are traitors - they have to be dealt with legally.
I don't even understand the premise of your argument anymore because it seems to flip-flop. Are you one of those Fake Libertarians, or a real one?
I haven't flip-flopped at all. I am saying I agree with you in theory, but in practice things are not as simple as we'd like them to be. Just because WE think or know something is wrong doesn't mean others agree - especially those with the power to actually do something about it; those who control the courts, government, what-have-you.
You seem to be saying truth is democratic and reality is subjective.
And no, I'm not a lolbertarian, lol