14 22 States are now OPPOSING the Texas lawsuit. What now? 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑 posted 126 days ago by LibertarianWalkz 126 days ago by LibertarianWalkz +14 / -0 34 comments share 34 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (34) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 6 ▼ – r_u_srs_srsly 6 points 126 days ago +7 / -1 it's not a popularity contest. who fucking cares about it. Either the case had merit to be heard or it didn't before states chose a side. Nothing has changed. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 126 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 19 states? Why are other people saying 22? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 126 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 So this changes nothing? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 4 ▼ – TLDC 4 points 126 days ago +4 / -0 I think this was an unforced error on their part. By submitting an amicus opposing the case, they actually illustrate the need for SCOTUS to hear the case and make a ruling. Had they simply ignored it like it was no big deal, the court could have declined the case and cited state legislatures as the remedy. Instead, they cite using STATE COURTS to interpret election law, which is Constitutionally mandated to fall to the LEGISLATURE of each state. Obviously it doesn't guarantee anything will happen, but I think that it gives the Justices ample reason to at least hear the case. The best part is that it is an original jurisdiction case and we get to present EVIDENCE. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 126 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 Amicus? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 Oh, so the Lib states are just stating their support? None actually -joined-? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – JohnCocktoastin 4 points 126 days ago +4 / -0 Nah, its showtime. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 Enjoy the show. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 126 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – fapoo 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 If anything, i think it guarantees SCOTUS will see the case. They couldn't leave it at this state where everyone is at each others throats permalink save report block reply ▲ -1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] -1 points 126 days ago +1 / -2 That's good, but overall, that's more states against than supporting. Baaad omen. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – fapoo 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 Dont see how permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 Right. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Apersonofinterest 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 I’d say this was to be expected. If they don’t defend PA and the rest, we might come looking through their election processes. I’m looking at you California. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Apersonofinterest 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 Is also like to add, I just said yesterday after a day of WINNING to expect bullshit today and here it is. Read their briefs. They got nothing. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Gmama2 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 All of the mob families opposed Rudy. permalink save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – White 0 points 126 days ago +1 / -1 Where did you hear this? permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 It's all over New. Even now. What happens if there are more states against than for? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – White 3 points 126 days ago +3 / -0 it doesn't change anything permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 Phew. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -8 ▼ – deleted -8 points 126 days ago +1 / -9 ▲ 2 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 For what it's worth, it's not a popularity contest, and it's just Amicus. Also, SCOTUS -HAS- to see this now, since it's gone hot. Let's just hope they don't cuck out against our favor. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – deplorabetty 0 points 126 days ago +1 / -1 It is neither a "bad sign" nor unexpected. Of course states where they have probably been cheating for decades and don't want to be subjected to their own audits will come out in support of the ones who got caught red handed. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -8 ▼ – The_General_Patton -8 points 126 days ago +2 / -10 This only forces SCOTUS to hear the case. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 They can't ignore it now, huh? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -9 ▼ – The_General_Patton -9 points 126 days ago +1 / -10 When one State sues another, they can't ignore. SCOTUS decides. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz [S] 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 So it's FOR REAL going to SCOTUS? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -8 ▼ – The_General_Patton -8 points 126 days ago +1 / -9 Watch this video for explanation... https://banned.video/watch?id=5fd12ccf36e1a46b3eda83b0 permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -11 ▼ – deleted -11 points 126 days ago +2 / -13
it's not a popularity contest.
who fucking cares about it.
Either the case had merit to be heard or it didn't before states chose a side. Nothing has changed.
19 states? Why are other people saying 22?
So this changes nothing?
I think this was an unforced error on their part.
By submitting an amicus opposing the case, they actually illustrate the need for SCOTUS to hear the case and make a ruling.
Had they simply ignored it like it was no big deal, the court could have declined the case and cited state legislatures as the remedy.
Instead, they cite using STATE COURTS to interpret election law, which is Constitutionally mandated to fall to the LEGISLATURE of each state.
Obviously it doesn't guarantee anything will happen, but I think that it gives the Justices ample reason to at least hear the case.
The best part is that it is an original jurisdiction case and we get to present EVIDENCE.
Amicus?
Oh, so the Lib states are just stating their support? None actually -joined-?
Nah, its showtime.
Enjoy the show.
If anything, i think it guarantees SCOTUS will see the case. They couldn't leave it at this state where everyone is at each others throats
That's good, but overall, that's more states against than supporting. Baaad omen.
Dont see how
Right.
I’d say this was to be expected. If they don’t defend PA and the rest, we might come looking through their election processes.
I’m looking at you California.
Is also like to add, I just said yesterday after a day of WINNING to expect bullshit today and here it is. Read their briefs. They got nothing.
All of the mob families opposed Rudy.
Where did you hear this?
It's all over New. Even now. What happens if there are more states against than for?
it doesn't change anything
Phew.
For what it's worth, it's not a popularity contest, and it's just Amicus.
Also, SCOTUS -HAS- to see this now, since it's gone hot. Let's just hope they don't cuck out against our favor.
It is neither a "bad sign" nor unexpected. Of course states where they have probably been cheating for decades and don't want to be subjected to their own audits will come out in support of the ones who got caught red handed.
This only forces SCOTUS to hear the case.
They can't ignore it now, huh?
When one State sues another, they can't ignore. SCOTUS decides.
So it's FOR REAL going to SCOTUS?
Watch this video for explanation...
https://banned.video/watch?id=5fd12ccf36e1a46b3eda83b0