to be charged all that is required is allegation. UCMJ is a bit different than common law.
Suppose 30 years later someone accuses you of rape. Now what?
That is what this ruling allows.
You will get dragged thru the mud. Yes, in the end evidence may set you free, but you've been brutalized by the military court system all along the way. Or better yet, your case is tried in civilian courts. Now you are really getting hammered.
rape is bad
however being falsely accused of rape is worse
this is not a good ruling from the court
I've seen men's reputations and livelihood destroyed over mere accusations.
Lets get some crying wolf laws on the books and then mayne we can discuss extending no statute of limitations to both.
Yes they did, until they fix the laws around false rape accusations ALL rape accusations should be suspect
to be charged all that is required is allegation. UCMJ is a bit different than common law.
Suppose 30 years later someone accuses you of rape. Now what?
That is what this ruling allows.
You will get dragged thru the mud. Yes, in the end evidence may set you free, but you've been brutalized by the military court system all along the way. Or better yet, your case is tried in civilian courts. Now you are really getting hammered.
This is a bad ruling
you are smelling what I'm cooking
rape is bad
falsely accusing someone 30 years after the fact, not good
This is a bad decision by the court and no doubt politically motivated.
what evidence will exist 30 years after?
I think you're missing my point
Hmmm, did a Hunter victim recently accuse him from his Navy days?
Is this really what is important right now? Fucks sake.