5358
Comments (166)
sorted by:
529
You_Aint_Black 529 points ago +540 / -11

Stop it. This is not "uncucking." They are asking that the relief Texas seeks be denied. They're actually saying that it would be ILLEGAL for the Supreme Court to interfere with the state legislatures by overruling the way they are selecting their slates of electors.

THEY ARE ASKING TO HAVE BIDEN'S "WIN" CERTIFIED. THIS IS NOT HOW YOU FUCKING "UNCUCK" YOURSELF, STOP CIRCLE-JERKING THIS, YOU FAGGOTS.

Sorry, sometimes y'all need some tough love.

153
supersecretaccount82 153 points ago +155 / -2

That's even more shameful than just not signing on at all, that's some true galaxy cuck energy.

54
deleted 54 points ago +57 / -3
39
11
deleted 11 points ago +13 / -2
1
Buff_cousin_Elroy 1 point ago +1 / -0

A phd in Cuckology

6
MNMathtic 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can't follow this. I think I need a diagram.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Pat4Evr 2 points ago +4 / -2

That is either a Triple Lindy Cuck or a Double Handhold cuck. I'm not sure which.

1
makenomistake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Triple Lindy Cuck

So appropriate that parts of Back to School were filmed in the People's Republic of Madison.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's great though because the military tribunals have more officials on record

23
OwnaLib87 23 points ago +24 / -1

This is how you double-cuck yourself...

in the butt.

2
Dialectic 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hard and deep even.

2
komenos_9 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cue Samwell I said cuck cuck, in the butt, I said, cuck cuck, in the butt, I said, cuck cuck, in the butt....

23
BarronTrump2032 23 points ago +23 / -0

Fuck you Yost. Fuck you deswine. What do the chicoms have on you two knuckleheads?

3
KitchenBitch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Never forget the ONEA airport phone number Jeffrey Epstein had in his little black book was Cleveland Municipal Airport. Epstein got his start with Sexy Lex Wexner of Victoria's Secret fame in little ole Columbus Ohio. #facts

3
ImFinallyNotAnAlt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Funny how Wexner immediately stepped down when the whole Epstein fiasco kicked off.

3
Dialectic 3 points ago +4 / -1

Kiddie fucking for sure.

12
richmomz 12 points ago +12 / -0

Well at least he supports SCOTUS hearing the case, even if he doesn't agree with Texas' proposed remedy. I'm down for whatever, as long as the SCOTUS comes up with a remedy that doesn't allow the bureaucratic fuckery of a couple of states to effectively overthrow an entire national election - that's what we're all really after here.

11
Lovepede 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ohio's text does affirm that state courts and executives should follow election law, it just ignores that the defendant states didn't do that and asks that no court intervenes in any election, ever. With the allegations against the defendant states I don't see how Ohio's argument can carry much weight - relief must be granted somewhere to remedy situations where law was not followed.

Ohio's argument can also be re-written like this:

What is more, the relief that Texas seeks would undermine a foundational premise of our federalist system: the idea that the States are sovereigns, free to govern themselves. The federal government has only those powers that the Constitution gives to it. And nothing in the Constitution empowers courts to issue orders affirmatively directing the States how to exercise their constitutional authority

=

And nothing in the Constitution empowers courts to issue orders affirmatively directing the States how to treat Black people on the Question of Slavery and Indentured Servitude in the Cotton Business. Fuck Off

2
FedUpAndReady 2 points ago +2 / -0

It sounds like he took the most non-position possible. Typical Ohio.

2
OhioProud 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ouch, bro. But yeah, it does feel that way right now

-1
Dride -1 points ago +4 / -5

Instead of rewriting it, cite it. I didn't read what you read.

7
LtPatterson 7 points ago +9 / -2

They're giving SCOTUS a very dangerous "out" that could destroy the case.

5
PM_ME_UR_MAGIC_CARDS 5 points ago +5 / -0

SCOTUS has no shortage of outs. They can literally not hear the case. Let's see what they do.

126
deleted 126 points ago +127 / -1
29
leahcim 29 points ago +33 / -4

Maybe he's right. The relief requested by Texas is the Supreme Court force the legislature to choose new electors... who the hell knows what that would bring us?

Trump is asking in his motion to intervene to have those electors thrown out, which means no majority, which means 1 state 1 vote.

Which would better for us?

Maybe the Ohio AG knows what's up. Either way, his support is on the big question, whether or not how the states conducted their elections were unconstitutional or not.

21
NeverInterruptEnemy 21 points ago +21 / -0

It’s absolutely possible to have an R state legislators cave and select Biden electors.

So that’s a fair point.

However in this case, without widespread dominion-based fraud, I don’t see them throwing out electors and going to 1 state 1 vote as they will see this as baby and bath water. Instead it seems more likely to get these four states legislatures to select directly select.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

FYI, they can meet and do that right now.

11
Modus_Pwninz 11 points ago +12 / -1

I don't know why people think 1 state 1 vote would be good for Trump...That means cucks can still cuck.

The Senate, for example, voted 100 to 0 for more H1B immigrants to take American jobs. Trump would never allow this shit the past four years - they're practically frothing at the mouth, not even waiting for him to be gone to continue selling us out.

4
leahcim 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't disagree. Nothing is guaranteed right now. Whether SCOTUS will hear the case, whether they'll rule in our favor and if they do which way it will go, whether selecting new electors from these states would be good for us or whether 1 state = 1 vote would be good for us.

There's a lot of wild cards here, and let's be honest, most are against Trump.

Best case scenario here is SCOTUS accepts the case, we finally have a hearing of fact, and it rules in our favor and SCOTUS actually says there's widespread election fraud based on the evidence.

THAT ALONE would give the new electors or the state legislatures the balls to send Trump electors.

Short of a literal bombshell coming out like Trump dropping the Farnkfurt/CIA/Siezes servers LARP becoming true, its an uphill battle no matter what.

But, this case is the best thing that we have had going for us since election day, so this is this. Short of Martial Law and Insurrection Act, it's all we have.

3
Modus_Pwninz 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only true win scenario is probably SCOTUS taking the case, ruling their votes invalid due to not following voter laws, and throwing out their EC votes. That gives Trump a win if I recall my counting correctly.

That said, if Trump invoked the Insurrection Act tomorrow and starting arresting motherfuckers left and right, it would be totally justified and I would laugh.

0
leahcim 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well that's another question I don't know that is answered or been discussed. IF they through out those 4 states electoral college votes, neither Trump or Biden would have 270 needed for the majority and it would go to the house of reps to choose by 1 state 1 vote.

But, maybe that would outright invalidate those 4 states ECs and you could still get a majority with the remaining votes, and that would be Biden with 244 to 232 Votes.

PA=20, MI=16, WI=10, GA=16. 476 EC votes without him, 238 is the Majority. Biden wins if they do that.... ugh maybe they would do that.

4
dahdahdah_dahditdah 4 points ago +4 / -0

There’s no concept of winning with a bare majority of EC votes. It’s either 270 or else it falls to Congress. That’s what the Constitution requires.

1
leahcim 1 point ago +2 / -1

Where's your opinion coming from?

Here's an excerpt from the 12th Amendment:

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;–the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;–The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

Key parts:

"The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed;"

Yes 270 is the Majority. There are 538 Electoral College votes under normal circumstances.

But there is no precedent in this case, every little anyway, the Supreme Court can say whatever they want.

The key line here is "Whole number of electors appoitned."

If the Supreme Court rules these 4 states do not get to appoint electors, then that is 476 total Electoral votes, not 538.

A Majority of 476 is 239. Biden has 244 Votes without those 4 states. Trump only has 232.

This is a completely plausibile scenario they Supreme Court can Validate Trump, he win this case, but still lose if they declare the electors from those 4 states can't be certified.

Explain to me how this isn't a possibility?

3
Modus_Pwninz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah right, I forgot you still need 270 regardless - and that's a solid rule.

7
MyAuntFanny 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thanks for this explanation. I am trying to understand what happened from these posts, but I'm at work and can't quite put in the time to read the filing yet!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
The_RedWolf 1 point ago +2 / -1

Win or lose its far better for the nation’s health to have the case heard.

We could very well see a situation where two states are considered constitutional and two aren’t. This is not necessarily an “all or nothing” case.

If it was a 9-0 dismissal you could very well have the beginnings of a civil war

11
Mdadbrother88 11 points ago +11 / -0

If the Supreme Court rules that the election process was conducted unconstitutionally within the states questioned, what else needs to be said?

At that point, the state legislators would have a difficult choice, either they invoke article 2 section 1 of the constitution...

... or refuse and be undeniably complicit in the fraud. I believe option 2 would lead to many Trump supporters engaging in "peaceful protests" in front of the chambers of their elected officials and dragging them out on to the street to be tarred and feathered.

5
Dride 5 points ago +5 / -0

No he does not, read the underlined text. Also the brief. He says Scotus should take the case and cites that legislatures set the rules. That's Texas argument. He also cited that he couldn't reach council to be able to offer support

0
The_RedWolf 0 points ago +1 / -1

It’s far more noble to say “I disagree but they should get their fair day in court” than dismiss.

So I’m not going to complain. There’s bigger fights to worry about

-62
deleted -62 points ago +1 / -63
21
chynaisbuttscythe 21 points ago +21 / -0

Leave already. No one wants your copy and paste posts everywhere.

7
Triiton 7 points ago +7 / -0

stfu faggot

3
1776part2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

DEPORT!!!

74
deleted 74 points ago +75 / -1
33
BillboDickens 33 points ago +34 / -1

This AG is trying to save face. If he meant it, it would be in the Supreme court filing. I consider this statement irrelevant unless he amends his brief.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
30
Tombstone2W 30 points ago +37 / -7

Ohio isn't a swing state anymore, it's MAGA country.

16
Carbum 16 points ago +16 / -0

Its about time we remind them of it.

9
ShadowyMrBlank 9 points ago +9 / -0

Goddamn right.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
24
KingDomoro 24 points ago +24 / -0

As an Ohio resident, fuck any official who doesn't completely back our Constitution. Being a beta and bringing up state legislatures when the States in question DIDN'T abide by that is revolting.

5
witchism 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yost took the side of the State (bureaucracy) instead of the side of the citizen. Typical RINO Republican. Just like Dewine. Neither of them will be reelected. Dewine is despised by Republicans. And he knows it.

18
JoeTrump 18 points ago +18 / -0

That's NOT what the Court Filing says! It backed nobody!

16
mariod818 16 points ago +17 / -1

Didn't ohio file against Texas today?

5
Eroticaenthusiast 5 points ago +6 / -1

They originally filed a vague "do something" without any real indication of what they wanted.

0
mariod818 0 points ago +3 / -3

Oh so they changed their minds lol well thats good

14
ArcDoe 14 points ago +14 / -0

No they didn't. the people saying otherwise are either lying or haven't read the filing.

14
Dialectic 14 points ago +15 / -1

Yost filed the gayest brief in the entire country. Ohio is still cucked.

10
HookInMouth 10 points ago +11 / -1

As an Ohioan this cowardly bs pisses me off. Dewine, Portman and Yost have just shown us their true colors. You're either against this treason perpetrated against the American people by the deep state or you are part of it. The days of riding both sides of the fence are over. Grow a damn spine you cowards. Enjoy your last term in office because your names will not be forgotten during your next election cycle. At least Jim Jordan has our backs here in the Buckeye State.

2
Mamapedia 2 points ago +3 / -1

Tried to call DeWine and Yost again today (I did get thru yesterday). Both numbers say mailbox full or not accepting calls currently. Got thru to Portman's office and the phone was answered by soyboy sounding person. I asked whether Ohio was planning on supporting Texas- he said he had no idea and that it had nothing to do with Portman. Ok, technically correct but pretty much confirmed to me that Portman, along with DeWine and Yost are just fine with a Biden steal. They have revealed their allegiance, and it's not to Ohio republicans or the constitution.

3
HookInMouth 3 points ago +3 / -0

I got through to Yost office yesterday and when i asked the operator if he was going to support Texas vs SCOTUS she transferred me back to the queue and it told me to call back in an hour then hung up. These RINO holdovers need to go. They don't represent us.

2
Mamapedia 2 points ago +2 / -0

They sure dont. I got all kareny on the poor boy who answered DeWine's phone today. Too bad!

3
HookInMouth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dewine needs to get off of these damn mandates. All they are is slight if hand to keep the focus off of the fraudulent election. All of them are complicit in this

2
Mamapedia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Plus barring the use of therapeutics like HCQ (and ivermectin?). He's loving it

2
HookInMouth 2 points ago +2 / -0

HCQ was fine until DJT announced he used it and recommended it to the Michigan state senator. Once she thanked DJT in a presser for recommending it Fauci started his disinfirmation campaign. No way jn hell I'm taking this new vaccine.

1
Mamapedia 1 point ago +1 / -0

You got it! I'm not taking the vaccine either. I worry about my kids and if they will be forced to take it for school/jobs. I have lost faith in government totally - just trust DJT

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Mamapedia 2 points ago +2 / -0

I emailed the douche yesterday. Will do so again. Thanks

8
okdoomer 8 points ago +9 / -1

I have called the AGs office multiple times here in Ohio only to be on hold for 15 minutes before the line goes dead. Can confirm: we are still cucked

3
Mamapedia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Happened to me yesterday. Finally got thru after 25 mins. Today recording said no one to take calls. They know exactly what they are doing

8
choobster 8 points ago +8 / -0

why dont we have a down vote button?

5
abomb007 5 points ago +5 / -0

Go to settings, turn off Community Styling, and save. This post needs to be downvoted for being misleading.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
sentient-potato 6 points ago +6 / -0

Over 3k upvotes for this, the title is FALSE.

3
Sum_devil 3 points ago +5 / -2

Some of the cheerleaders standing ringside are gonna feel a lot safer getting in the fight once they see the steam building.

I’m glad my state jumped in the ring with Texas first. Fuck yeah. Not cucks.

3
Poopyonurface 3 points ago +4 / -1

This is about as cucked as it gets. Basically he’s saying this:

It’s not unreasonable to wonder if last minute changes exposed the election systems to vulnerabilities. BUT even though the US constitution governs who appoints the electors from each state, the SCOTUS has no right to question whether or not the constitution was adhered to and not undermined by executive and judicial branches within the state.

Fuck off

1
LtPatterson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally correct post. Fuck this logic and fuck Yost citing the Federalist papers as if they are law. They aren't.

2
SteveSanchez80 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would say that the best and only solution that the SCOTUS should apply is to PENALIZE those states for failing to hold legal elections and so to strip their ability to have ANY electors sent to the Congress. At this point, does anyone trust those states in their entirety to select electors? The timid Vichy Repubics might select Biden at this point since they are so cowered by the Governor, SOS and AG of these states otherwise they would have done it ON THEIR OWN! So I think the best solution is to just send it to the "People's House" and have them go with the "one state, one vote." EXPECT the media campaign on the 5 GOP reps who are sole representatives (ND, SD, AK, WY, MT) to be under INTENSE media pressure to Cuck and vote for Biden so they will need to be in witness protection for the holidays but I think we'll get through it safely. Watch Liz Cheney, she is a Never Trumper but she will need to stay in line if she has any future plans.

2
BaconBun11 2 points ago +4 / -2

Bit confused. First it was long silence. Then "maybe look at it, SCOTUS, but I'm not taking a side".

Is it really now support or is Ohio still being a fence-sitter? I'm still thinking the latter.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
1
BaconBun11 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's what I figured.

1
stjimmy92 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you haven’t heard more yet, it’s basically this: we’re asking the Supreme Court to decide whether or not Executive officials can Constitutionally change election laws without the legislature, but only for future elections because Biden won this one and the Court isn’t allowed to change that.

2
Thingthing22 2 points ago +4 / -2

Yeah, dumbass. If the SCOTUS rules in opposition that means any state can vote any which way by executive decree, effectively making the governors the elective body that determines the outcome of elections. How did we let tyranny get this far? Oh. COVID.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just like the martians, undone by a cold.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
2
Trumpette1 2 points ago +7 / -5

Excellent

2
BunnyPicnic 2 points ago +2 / -0

If this isn't original jurisdiction, what is? What court is legally allowed to hear disputes between states?

2
superchump555 2 points ago +2 / -0

What De-Wine Wined by Trump Wine

2
LtPatterson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't upvote this post, it is a lie.

2
SideofB33f 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasn’t it the cucked PA legislature that changed the voting rules right before the election? If that’s the case, what’s the case against PA?

2
schism 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's written into the PA constitution that changes must be made via a constitutional amendment, not just by enacting a law. Additionally, there are certain constitutionally mandated waiting periods, public notice requirements, and I believe it has to be voted on by citizens before a constitutional amendment can be enacted. None of this was followed.

2
trainbyday 2 points ago +2 / -0

No he didnt Uncuck himself. You Ohio Pedes that called his office and emailed him did this! You guys are amazing Godspeed

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
CrankyCrab 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you Ohio pedes. We know you had to bitch slap this cuck AG to force him to grow a backbone.

2
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 2 points ago +2 / -0

so...he went off half-cucked?

1
Colerag 1 point ago +2 / -1

Where are you at Kentucky?

1
PlateOwner 1 point ago +2 / -1

Democrats tried to pull a fast one.

Republicans: Reset.

1
JuicyfearsMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you, now where the hell is Kentucky, Idaho, Alaska, and Wyoming?

1
Enlivenus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeee haaaa!

1
blackkit27 1 point ago +1 / -0

As an Ohioan If I was Governor I would have filed it myself, Fuck Dave Yost (8th in Governor Line) and Fuck the Top 5 in that line currently (Mike Dewine, Jon Husted, Larry Obhof, Bob Cupp & Frank Larose), all 6 are Criminals with Ties to China and all should Swing together.

1
Okiedoked2 1 point ago +1 / -0

It worked Ohio pedes our many contracts to Yost finally beared some fruit!

1
impossiblebones 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gotta love a state that gets hi between two o's.

1
Renegade440 1 point ago +1 / -0

We unfortunately have a major RINO problem here in Ohio. We the people won't forget this.

2
EdisonHwy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kaisch Disease

Spineless and slimey

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
stjimmy92 2 points ago +2 / -0

We literally are asking them to only rule for future elections

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
The_RedWolf 0 points ago +2 / -2

It’s not an uncucking but it’s far better than screaming “dEBooooKed”

-1
TrumpIsTheVictor -1 points ago +5 / -6

GOOD.

So were at 19 states in support, correct?

North Carolina should be ashamed.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
5
TrumpIsTheVictor 5 points ago +5 / -0

It would have "flipped" for him if needed.

1
SteveSanchez80 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have Dem Gov, AG and SOS. AG won with 50.13 to 49.87 basically 14K votes out of like 6 million.

-1
Viewer01 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Lmfao. All the bell weather states are with Trump again. Cant wait for the 7-6 ruling in favor of Biden.

3
SteveSanchez80 3 points ago +3 / -0

7-6?

2
TheMutualist 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a joke about impossible results.

1
Viewer01 1 point ago +2 / -1

.... dead justices voting in favor of Biden? badum tis.

-2
live_free -2 points ago +4 / -6

Decucked!!