posted ago by 3stepsahead
+7913 / -2
The court's 5-3 ruling means that absentee ballots will be counted only if they are in the hands of municipal clerks by the time polls close on Nov. 3.
The justices determined the courts shouldn't be the ones to decide the election rules amid the coronavirus pandemic that is surging in Wisconsin and across the world.
"The Constitution provides that state legislatures — not federal judges, not state judges, not state governors, not other state officials — bear primary responsibility for setting election rules," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a concurring opinion.
The court's 5-3 ruling means that absentee ballots will be counted only if they are in the hands of municipal clerks by the time polls close on Nov. 3.
The justices determined the courts shouldn't be the ones to decide the election rules amid the coronavirus pandemic that is surging in Wisconsin and across the world.
"The Constitution provides that state legislatures — not federal judges, not state judges, not state governors, not other state officials — bear primary responsibility for setting election rules," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a concurring opinion.
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/10/26/u-s-supreme-court-declines-change-wisconsins-voting-rules/3670662001/
"Hello Supreme Court? This is the Supreme Court. Remember that thing we said?"
Remember the Constitution? Or is that just an old piece of paper now
"Yellowed parchment my old friend, there's commies 'round here once again...."
In CCP language - WANG WANG IN FANG FANG'S THANG THANG.
Fang Fang's Wang Wang in Swalwell's Boof Rang
@PatrioticPAP That’s funny right there!
This whole thread fell apart after that comment :P
WI fed judge tried to weasel word around "manner" during questioning and delineate between implementation and manner of election. Not compelling (they are inextricably linked) I'm not a judge.
In german please
NEIN SCHWINEHUND
Schadenboner.
Delivering, Liebchen:
Jeder Staat soll in der von seiner gesetzgebenden Körperschaft vorgeschriebenen Weise eine Anzahl von Wahlmännern bestellen, die der Gesamtzahl der dem Staat im Kongreß zustehenden Senatoren und Abgeordneten gleich ist, doch soll kein Senator oder Abgeordneter oder jemand, der ein Vertrauens- oder besoldetes Amt unter der Hoheit der Vereinigten Staaten bekleidet, zum Wahlmann bestellt werden…
schadenfreude
Schwuchtel.
Yeah but the constitution is old and there's a 99.9% survivable virus so just let us cheat and stop suppressing the votes of the dead and non-citizens, bigot.
Wham ba lam whoa Black Betty
And sending whores
Patriots denied Pantifas last wish
and 30/06
I have multiple Spam cans of HXP 78 on standby pede!
And even their own 7.62 Love me a good ak Commies got one thing right somehow But even a broken clock is right twice a day
Communism is good at exactly one thing: creating death.
Extremely reliable death at that
Ak47 is like the trump train
Cant be stopped
A warcomp helps.
With the sound of SCOTUS
Good One, & someone is betraying their age!
I gave y'all all the verbage y'all need. Get 'em.
Username checks the kek out
Top kek
It’s a living document, they say. I heard Scalia speak years ago during law school, before Trump, in the thick of the liberal academic indoctrination. And Scalia loathed the lie of the living document. That was the day I really started to wake up.
Darth Vader Ginsberg was strong in the dark side. It kept her alive past her time.
Only the good die young.
Because God wants to give the evil ones a chance to be saved from eternal damnation. That's why old socks of shit like RBG, Hillary, and Sheets Byrd hang around so long...
I never thought of it that way. God definitely has a purpose for everything.
Salient point.
Yeah, look at Soros.
Emperor Palpatine
I wouldn’t be surprise if Gorg Sorrows, Demon of the 8th Circle is running around with a few extra organs (locally sourced sic) keeping him alive and kicking past his expiration date.
Proof is George Soros.
Like George Floyd?
We should erect a monument in her honor. Ironically. The left would seethe so hard
She died to save us from her sins XD
LOL
Then their tears with fill the glorious moat that surrounds the monument.
A pitchfork, with Soros' head on a pike?
I think the white hats had some wetworks on that one, and I support it.
Pretty sure she was long dead and the White HAts controlled the date of her announcement.
That and private health insurance a shitload better than the Medicare they peddle off on the rest of us.
oh my god, she died and brought balance to the force... what the hell...
Ginsburg is the biggest proof that they thought they couldn’t lose. They knew she was going to croak but they believed their own bs polls.
I guess she was getting freezer burned or starting to stink more than usual. Can you imagine the democraps faces when they realized the gig was up and they had to announce her death.
You can’t see her death as anything but a gift from God at this point.
I guess they killed him so Obama could try to get in Garland.
I think Garland was always a placeholder, they knew he wouldn’t advance. Bill Clinton promised the seat to Loretta Lynch in the tarmac meeting, and Hillary was going to put her there “when” she won
It's a bummer the Democrats killed him
I have trouble figuring out what you're trying to say here.
They can’t amend the Bill of Rights. This is one reason they want Christianity to die out. Our rights are given by our creator, NOT by the government.
Sure you can, if you're a fuckin' democrat!
We can kill them all, too.
Not OP, but I think what he’s saying is that the Constitution can be changed, but there’s a process for that. A justice can’t just rule against precedent or based on their personal feelings to change what the Constitution really means.
I don’t mind it being referred to as a living document, if by that they mean it can be amended. If they mean it’s a living document that changes without being amended and actually changed then that is clearly insane.
Amendments gave us a period of extreme violence and crime with the ban on alcohol. We don't need more amendments.
Amendments also gave us freedom of speech.
The bill or rights was put in before all states originally ratified the Constitution, so that point really doesn’t stand.
Every amendment from women’s suffrage on was a loss for our country
That is in the Bill of Rights, which are self evident and bestowed upon us by God only.
No, we are born with freedom of speech as a God given right. A government amendment doesn't give us that right. It lets the government know where our boundaries are.
We know that. However, no first amendment, no freedom of speech in the USA.
The difference is the Bill of Rights defines what the government can't take away. The 21st Amendment was the complete opposite.
The 18th was prohibition of alcohol, the 21st repealed it - but I get what you're saying.
It was community activist women of the day that gave us Prohibition. No surprise there, lol.
I’d say amendments for term limits, 9 scotus judges, and limiting intelligence agencies power would be nice to add. Plus, times change. Someday we might want to limit the government in other ways.
nigga that is prolly da dumbest shit ive ever saw a nigga say lmao sit down son
They want it to be a living document so they can kill it....as they are known to do.
And make it vote Democrat
Top kek
Oh that old thing? Well sources familiar with the founding fathers’ thinking can confirm they didn’t intend to stick to it in times of a pandemic. Checkmate drumpftard.
But muh raycizzm
Very anonymous sources, no doubt.
If the constitution no longer applies than there is no reason to not split up.
We need to let new england cali or and ny at the least leave
Sad part is, all counties in NY, other than the cities, are deep RED... The wife and I are out of here once we zero in on a good freedom loving spot to raise our daughter
We could kick them out via trebuchet.
Huh?
I get that; however, I do not see quote you posted above.
That's because it's as real as Trump calling our vets losers.
Doug Thompson: This is to let you know that the piece on Bush and the Constitution has been changed and reads:
“This article was based on sources that we thought, at the time, were reliable. We have since discovered reasons to doubt their veracity. For that reason, this article has been removed from our database.”
I no longer stand behind that article or its conclusions and have said so in answers to several recent queries. In addition, I have asked that it be removed from a documentary film.
Quote from Bush. He was and is a POS
Don’t believe everything you read on the internet
-Abraham Lincoln
I get that. I am simply questioning the propinquity of this absurd quote to Bush.
I rarely ask for sources, but this "quote" is just straight bs from the looks of it.
propinquity.
Damn! That's a winning scrabble word if I ever saw one.
Dad (RIP) taught me that word when I was eighteen . Never found an opportunity to use it until tonight.
Figured: what the fuck...why not.
Fuck Coumo and his propinquity to Chyna
To those unfamiliar:
SCOTUS LOVES precedent.
Kagan is by far my favorite of the left justices. She USUALLY has a good sense of reason in her rulings. It'll be interesting. MAYBE we'll get lucky with her.
She at least has enough sense to know that her actions have consequences.
I respect the fact that she's always willing to attend President Trump's State of the Union addresses. Remember, Ginsburg wouldn't go.
I'm imagining the hell Satan has planned for her in the fiery pits down blow. An eternity of sitting in the SOTU listening to a never ending Trump Speech.
Good. Better would be having to listen to every talk Clarence Thomas has given about the Constitution and having his opinions and dissents perpetually read to her.
Hard to go when you're in the morgue pede.
Milkers on a dude, dressed like a chick trying look like a dude.
Patton Oswald with udders.
Thanks for ruining my date night...lol.
There are no women on the Internet.
G.uy I.n R.eal L.ife
Bruh
Bruh!!!! I had to see what she looked like. And while she does have quite the set of milkers.... I was stumped as to if Kagan identified as a she/her/female or if Kagan identified as IT.
Kagan is the only person I have ever seen where IT's head is bigger at the chin than at the top of the skull.
http://www.theglobaldispatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Elena-kagan-donkeyhotey.jpg
I'd rather "get lucky with" MILF ACB
I'll see myself out
I said this earlier in a post. I think it'll go 7-2 Sotomayor and Breyer dissenting.
I keep reminding myself that Roberts knows all the FISA applications that have been approved. They were waiting for this moment.
You mean this?:
https://thedonald.win/p/11QRtYLIIu/the-big-weapon/c/
I believe Scalia recommended Kagan to Obama. He at least respected her legal mind. The wise Latina is another story.
Yes she gets it right sometimes and isn't as rabidly partisan as RGB or Sotamayor.
Scalia did. Its also fact that Kagan rules with Alito 60% of the time.
Yeah, Motorvotermayor is going to vote for FraudJoe, most likely.
There is no way Kagan rules against a fraudulent Joe Biden steal. She is a leftist to the core.
Damn, you went straight for the nuke. Didn't even bother to work your way up.
Down voted for the disgusting praise that satanic waste of a cunt Ginsberg got.
try legalized ritualistic child sacrifice.
Underage pedofilia at age 12
Cool it with the antisemitic remarks!
big yikes
Would you take a bullet for all the fetus Ruth is sleeping on right now?
Wrong John Roberts. Pretty sure that's talking about the guy from Fox News.
Not according to Lin Wood
Why would the deep state want kompromat on a single reporter when they basically control the entire media apparatus?
No one knows.
He's probably getting major pressure.
Remember during the last three confirmations how the Dems had hissy fits about stare decisis...follow the precedents... . Pepe Farms Remembers.
Yup. It allows them to pass the buck in a way and take the heat off of them directly, and let’s be honest, they will have a whole hell of a lot of heat on them because of the corrupt media no matter what decision they make, so they might as well do what everyone knows is the not only legal thing to do, but more importantly, the moral thing.
The right justice died
Name checks out.
Put a lid on a yid.
Funny, you spelled satanic wrong
"The wrong kid died!"
And she never paid for drugs! Not once!
It sounds like they’re asking for martial law to be declared and for GA, MI, PA, WI, and AZ to be occupied by the military until the China conspirators are rooted out and tried for treason.
That was decided before ACB too. Lol.
Sounds like a precedent to me right there.
It is a precedent. It's THE precedent. You'd just have to prove which ones were late. So, any ballot that got there after polls shut down are invalid. End of story.
Re-read:
If accurate, general implications re legislative dominance not just mail in after the 3rd.
SCOTUS already wrote who does and doesn't set election laws. Paragraph 3.
Yup. There are no true doomers now, only shills pretending. Everyone knows this was stolen, even the left. Their side now has the actual doomers. Though most are still under the spell of the fake news narrative.
There will be a hell of a lot more crying leftists in our future, and that is a wonderful thing
Comfy pilled
In other words, all those mailing of ballots to people who didn't request them, all those extensions given by courts and governors, the signature verification being waived by governors, the ballots being opened before the law prescribed, are all illegal.
In more simple terms: Trump won. Big.
This ^^ all of it.
They really just recited the constitution. Seems like an easy job.
In the states that are being sued, the decision to mass-mail out ballots and change election rules was made not by the legislature but by Secretaries of State, governors, a friend of someone who worked in the tax office, whatever. So by the Supreme Court ruling against the four states in the TX suit, they’re not just limiting themselves to saying the late ballots were unconstitutional. They’re saying the whole election was unconstitutional. And that precedent could apply to a lot more than just the four states in this suit.
So, would MI, PA, WI, GA et al be unable to send any electors or does the decision revert back to the state legislators who to send in case of an invalid election? I am worried that SCOTUS rules that the elections are invalid, but that the state legislators are then the ones who decide which electors to send (or to send none), and then cuck out and still send Biden electors due to „will-of-tha-people“.
It means all ballot items are questionable.
THIS is the most beautiful comment!
It's not just the late mail-ins, any election rules made by parties other than State Legislature illegitimize the election. These states have attempted to certify a result that is the product of an illegitimate and unConstitutional election process.
Exactly 💯
dingdingding
Orange man make for good memes though!:
https://thedonald.win/p/11PWCVtQZU/orange-is-the-new-backtoback/c/
From what I could tell all the provisions and new rules that various Governors and Sec of States made to allow the mail in ballots or other changes to the election in the name of "covid" were not valid. Any changes to election rules (or what constitutes a legal vote) needs to be passed through the state legislatures. The 4 states in the lawsuit did not do any of this (You could say other states as well) so those changes are not legal and thus any votes that were cast under those "rules" should be deemed illegal and not counted.
I read a post earlier today that New Jersey made changes as well but the made their changes to allow mail-in through their state legislature so in that case the mail in ballots would need to be counted since they were deemed legal. Proving they were fraudulent would be a different matter.
Again the big crux in the Texas lawsuit is the main point is that these votes are fraudulent but that new rules were put in place that violated the Constitution which should make those votes invalid.
You have to wonder if when GEOTUS advised not to vote by mail-in ballot he was aware of this strategy all along--that the mail-in ballots would be disqualified--but didnt want to show his hand at the time, so that Biden voters would disqualify their votes in mass haha.
Well good god damn I think you’re right.
You have to believe that some of it was that - if they invalidate all the mail in ballots across the country where laws were not passed by state legislatures then the final vote tally could be massive in his favor, both electorally and the popular vote. I dont think SCOTUS will rule that for every state in the country though, but they may at least in the 4 defendant states.
Can we go back to California and remove mail in ballots from here as well? Our legislator and some congressmen were pretty upset that Gavin has changed the Elections laws without going threw the legislators.
"By signing Assembly Bill 860 into law, Newsom defused the principal legal argument against the universal vote-by-mail argument. Plaintiffs argued he had exceeded his authority by implementing a sweeping change to election management without consulting the Legislature."
https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2020/06/18/california-lawmakers-pass-november-mail-ballot-bill-with-surprising-gop-support-1293679
Looks like they avoided the extrslegal problem by getting the cucked legislature to pass. Whether the election was conducted according to statute is another question (like how other states deviated from specific statute). State legislature could pass a law that says Cali decides electors based on a beer pong tournament, if that's the manner the elected legislature chooses.
Phoneglish
Its the reason not the ruling that matters. Read the last paragraph.
^^^^^ 1000x THIS!
^^^^^ 1000x THIS!
You mean this?
Did you happen to notice if this was cited in the Texas suit?
In a sane world any ballot received after midnight of election day gets tossed. With the exception of citizens that are overseas and they were post marked on or before voting day
Any ballot cast and counted in contravention of the state election statute would be illegal. Schemes to alter statute outside the legislature would be unconstitutional. The constitution has remedies for illegal elections built in.
The only argument against this is that it can be abused by whoever is in charge of delivering ballots. If they're partisan shitbags like they seem to already be they could intentionally slow-walk the ballots so they end up late, but in a plausibly deniable way like "Oops! Guess all these Republican votes don't count. I just got stuck at a train crossing and couldn't make it on time. Darn!"
Ye, that is why you vote in person.
If you decide to let someone deliver your vote for you that happens.
How did they do it before the 2020 election? Did they count mail in ballots after the polls closed?
You’re conflating when the ballots were reported with when they were received. Plenty of legal ballots were reported after midnight too. Only the ones RECIEVED after midnight should go
But they backdated. Plus Im sure they havent seperated them to say these batch of 50,000 were the 3am ballots we scanned 3 times.
If they mixed them all up to prevent separation, throw them all out
Only fair way is all polluted counts are out
Doesn't matter the fact they were accepted after the fact by decree is enough.
upTrump for primary sources.
It's annoying how they keep talking about how covid was this big safety issue.
I ain't got no book learnin', but I think you might be right, Lawyerpede.
Well, put the final nail in the rumors and make it 6-3
Now that we have ACB. Roberts even sided with the conservatives.
Bet he won’t this time.
Hopefully it won't matter. I think ACB being in on Bush v. Gore is significant beyond just being on "our side." She saw the vote stealing attempted by Gore during that fiasco and now is at the center of a hurricane of fraud. Prayers for wisdom and constitutionality for her and the others.
Here there’s 3 factors to consider:
Is the law on our side? Yes—-state legislatures are supposed to Make election law.
Was the illegal law changes enough to effect the election result?
Should give total relief by overturning results?
We need 5 Justices to say yes to all three.
Then we need a 4th thing to go our way—-will overturning t he results still result in a Trump win?
"will overturning t he results still result in a Trump win?"
This is a hot topic of discussion in my house.
What is the path of least resistance to accomplish this?
It's moot. I hope they do the right thing... but, Insurrection Act.
How exactly? The math seems pretty straight forward, don't PA MI WI GA hold something like 50+ votes?
They have 62 (PA: 20, GA: 16, MI: 16, WI: 10) votes all combined. Trump needs any 3 of these states to win.
b/c GITMO for child fuckin??
Takes a special kind of stupid to knowingly side with the losers when treason is on the table.
He asks china what they want
Roberts: "I am the moderate one. That means if it's a close call, I have to side with the leftists. But if it's a slam dunk, I can side with the right.""
“Until there are 9”
This may be why the TX case is the main strategy for the "non-kinetic" remedy to the stolen election. I think Ted Cruz and Jay Sekulow, knowing the Constitution and SCOTUS methodology, crafted this perfectly. Meaning, not only would the court have to throw out the constitution to find for the defendants, but they would have to overturn their own precedents as well. Bravo!
Double chech mate?! Unpossible...
Actually, it like tic tac toe vs a 5 year old...
Tic-tac-toe but we get the first two moves. It's inevitable
Dems would be the artards drawing a fourth column to steal the game.
Not a problem for Roberts (see Obama care tax creativity and recent reversal). He's not as pivotal now though, so maybe the republic has a chance.
We still need to arrest a few thousand politicians and officials including elected ones police and military at a minimum
They need to hear the case first homie.
Yea, but they never allow the constitution or law apply if it benefits Trump, especially Roberts the cuck bitch.
Yeah, but they never allow the constitution or law apply if they can use NSA data to blackmail a Justice.
Because this was for local elector elections.
4? I'm curious what those are.
Thanks.
This exact sentence was in the Texas filing.
This guy reads. Honestly I didn’t read it but constitutional law is not my forte.
Seems pretty straight forward to me
Help me out then...
What ballots do we know were not in hands of clerks by polls close?
I mean the obvious counting and counting was BS, but I am not making the relation to practice issue here.
PA says (lies) that the segregated ballots between before and after. They say after was insignificant (probably also lie). But I must be missing the “BOOM” here.
Simple chain of custody, boom, proof.
Ruhroh says Scooby, I don’t have proof of chain of custody.
I can’t imagine the sleep I would lose as an election clerk sweating bullets if in couldn’t prove chain of custody and I was suddenly asked to prove all the ballots were legit.
Ok, but I didn’t read anything about chain of custody.
What are you referencing?
🤨
I know there are chain of custody issues in reality, I haven’t seen any written complaint about them, is it in the Texas lawsuit? Did PA MI WI GA set aside chain of custody laws because of Covid?
From watching the various hearings for hours on end. Sorry too late to search it.
Ok, so it’s the Article2 comment.
Yea. Ok. We all agree Article2 is real and it’s bad to violate.
My issue is the responses today all day they didn’t violate (yea they did).
So the case SCOTUS would need to take is did the changes violate state law? There is some ambiguity there.
They have scanned photos (with timestamps) of each piece of mail should they need it. I'm guessing they have other proof we haven't necessarily seen yet, in addition to affadavits.
You're reading the wrong part.
Same.
Then again, so are a lot of things. The mental gymnastics the left is going to at this point is astounding. When you are void of morality you have nothing to lose by lying and trying to cover everything you say. I don't have it in my blood to lie. I suck at it so bad. Yet these people build their entire lives on it. It's sickening.
Yeah, they got around that by mass back dating them. You’d like to think there are protections in place on that postal equipment to prevent that. I know the IRS wouldn’t like it if my taxes were back dated to be on time.
Well every piece of mail is photographed so it should be easy to prove right. It shouldn't matter what the post mark is show us the photos. Unless they back dated the phot equipment also. Regardless it can be tracked.
Yes it is legit I moved a few years back. When I did a change of address I inadvertently checked the box to get an email of a picture of the mail coming to my house. Lots of pictures of junk mail in my Email weekly.
That's interesting you bring that up. The host of the Thomas Paine podcast said that on yesterday's episode. He said the USPS is being investigated since all mail is photographed there should be records and someone had to pay a lot of money. Possibly people in postal service dirty
Feel free to look it up.
https://www.usps.com/manage/welcome.htm
"Get Informed Delivery Now you can preview images* of your mail and manage your incoming packages on one dashboard without entering tracking numbers. From the Informed Delivery® dashboard, you can also sign up for text or email notifications, schedule delivery alerts, request Redelivery, enter USPS Delivery Instructions®, and more."
I know. I get spam of my junk mail now too.
Occasionally it’s handy.
Its good when you receive something that you had no idea was coming. (And is important) If that piece of mail had gone missing then you'd have no idea.
And you trust USPS because?..
Never said I trust the USPS or anyone for that matter. I have some faith in PATRIOTS TO STAND UP AND FIGHT FOR OUR FREEDOMS.
If the postal inspector general's office aren't traitorous commies, they are already conducting an investigation to find out which ballots were backdated.
The inverse is also true.
They are most likley commies and those photos are gone.
Go to a post office tomorrow. They are fucking mad houses. I had to go the other day and waited in a line that was a good 40 feet and there was no social distancing.
Backdating doesn't work when the language is "in the hands of clerks"
Texas will win.
Then we have to worry about how those 4 state legislatures will vote.
Wisconsin will be tough. Even though Republican majority, weak willed. We need a rally AT THE HOUSES OF THESE REPUBLICAN REPS so they do the right thing.
PA is good i think. Judging by the amicus they filed for Texans. But the others might get pressured to go Biden anyhow.
Isn't it one vote per state when this Texas case wins as nobody will be able to get 270 so its a house vote that we have majority?
The way I see it, either these 4 states elections are voided and no one gets a 270 majority, or SCOTUS tells each of these 4 states' legislatures to appoint their own electors pursuant to Article 2 Section 1 of the CONUS.
I like it!
It'll be more than just the "REEEEEEcuse", the threats and deplatforming is gonna ramp up to levels previously unseen
Brace yourselves
riots are coming
Why should she recuse herself? Is there a time limit on when and what a new justice can vote on?
Nope. But I’m sure Dems think she will rule against them. Dems, for some reason, think they own SCOTUS so that’s why they hate that Trump got to select SCOTUS justices during his term. BTW, I was being facetious about the time limit. She could rule any way she decides as soon as she officially joins SCOTUS. Just Dems think she should wait a “respectable” amount of time.
She also has a family to threaten
The loonies know Thomas don't give a fuck.
PLUS, of they really tried to get h to recuse because of Biden, they'd have to ADMIT Biden was a racist asshole to Clarence Thomas during his confirmation.
This is how it's gonna go down: 6-3 for Texas and any other state that joins. Of course the 3 dissenters will be Breyer, Kagan and the wise latina Sotomayor.
What happens next, I don't know.
But I do know how this ends
SPOILER ALERT
Trump wins!
Covid 19 on concervative judges may be their next option.
Dude, if RGB can be dead for 3 years while her pickled brain sat in her chair and her clerks wrote everything for her, I think the Justices can handle some #ChynaVirus
We're talking about Constitutionalists here; they aren't gonna back down. You think Kavanaugh will back down because of a cold? Clarence Thomas?? Heck no
Ah yes, the October Kraken.
It has a lot of tentacles and I’ve seen enough hentai to know where this is going
Enjoy this well deserved upvote.
Kurt?
"In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan gave that notion short shrift, noting Wisconsin's Republican-run Legislature hasn't met since April. Extending the deadline for absentee ballots should have been allowed, she wrote.
'On the scales of both constitutional justice and electoral accuracy, protecting the right to vote in a health crisis outweighs conforming to a deadline created in safer days,' Kagan wrote."
HAHAHAHA HONK HONK HONK HONK HONK
It really does give credibility to the idea that literally anybody could do that fucking job.
The retarded justice
Sotomayor is way worse than Keegan.
Apperantly they all suck chinas balls now
Wow. legitimately, wow.
How have I not heard of this until now? I'm no SCOTUS nerd or anything, but that is an unbelievably recent, unbelievably relevant ruling.
SCOTUS nerd lol. Is that a thing?
Yeah, we knew about this. Doesn't help.
NEEDED THAT WISCONSIN CUCK LEGE TO AWARD US THE ELECTORS.
Well hello there. You look like very welcomed news.
What a surprise the 3 democrats go against the constitution for some touchy feely reasons!
damn fang fang be getting around
So they would basically have to admit they were wrong a few months ago. Even if Roberts is that much of a cuck ACB can step in.
Seems positive.
How so?
Well 5 - 3 of scotus basically upheld the constitution in October. So theyd be basically saying since October Ive chamged my mind the constitution doesnt matter. Only Roberts is cucked enough to do that. But if he switches its 4 - 4 in which case ACB is now a justice so add her and its 5-4.
Its called precedence.
Doomers BTFO - does anyone really think the Supreme Court is going to say "yeah okay, we'll let blatantly unconstitutional acts slide this time but don't do it next time, m'kay"?
I read that in Mr. Mackey’s voice
Correct. It will be a true test of character and loyalty for all of the Supreme Court Justices. The question will be whether their paramount loyalty is to the Constitution or is to themselves. Do they fear backlash or civil unrest for the sake of upholding their oaths or will they completely rip up the constitution for a temporary and uneasy peace?
Let’s end this and get Trump official again.
I hope this is brought up to them.
It's recent. They got this. They'll definatly have it if we get a sticky
This makes sense since Trump said stop counting "I won" and Alito said put those votes on the side. He knew he was relying on precedent. Nov 3rd is Nov 3rd and thats it. Besides, if dem fuckers coordinated pennsylvania beforehand for months to pull off the absentee and mail voting after releasing covid on the world, they should be held to have to have counted all votes on the 3rd and the 3rd only.
The real beauty of the SCOTUS 5-3 Wisconsin decision is that it is precedent. The four states also provided a clear dividing line for the ballots that can be counted as received on Election Day. They all stopped counting in unison. When they quit counting, President Trump was way ahead on all four States. So far ahead Biden could never catch up.
In Miami, all absentee ballots had to be counted already OR at the supervisor of elections office by 7pm on election night.
The drop-boxes were gone 2 days before the election. If you wanted to vote that way on November 1st or 2nd or 3rd, you had to drive your ass to the municipal building and drop that ballot off.
By the way, there’s never any parking avail in that area either. Lol
sAfEr dAyS
I miss that .001% additional safety I used to have!
It really gave me peace of mind.
Literal insanity.
Next week is going to be so much fun. Soak it in pedes
This is awesome!
So SCOTUS already ruled this, these states ignored the ruling and did it their own way specifically going against the SCOTUS ruling, and are now saying SCOTUS can’t overturn it now because it’s already done and it would be a big mess.
It honestly doesn’t even seem possible that SCOTUS could not side with Trump on this. This must have been why so many close to Trump have been so confident Trump will win. They’ve known this was coming all along and knew it was already ruled in their favor a few months ago. Holy shit.
I’m sure the state legislatures want cover to do that. If scotus rules in Trump’s favor on anything in the lawsuit that should be enough cover for them to say the way the state government handled the election was unconstitutional so they are picking electors themselves.
Do you think they were unawares abou the ruling?
Now you know how many judges are activists. They love deciding based on emotion and finding some way to justify it. They have no fear and no logic.
@ravioli You Definitely Should! As I was reading your comments, I thought you were a lawyerpede😉
Trump SCOTUS is best SCOTUS.
No wonder they’re shutting bricks.
The Wisconsin federal judge today completely failed in his analysis. I feel so much better,
I saw “Boom”, “SCOTUS” and “ruling” and about shit myself.
They're referring to any and all election rules.
Wow. Wisconsin law required all mail in ballots be received in the election offices and counted on Election Day. President Trump wins Wisconsin.
6-3 if ACB had been confirmed at the time
5-3 Who were the three dissenters? Those butch lesbians scare me. :-(
Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. All radical liberals to the same degree as Ruth was. Kagan and Sotomayor were Obama’s picks.
Did someone say precedent?
The part that bugs me is that the state legislatures could end this tomorrow if they get off their asses and did their job.
This whole thing is a political game of chicken. The cowards in the state legislatures are waiting for the Supreme Court to allow them to do what the Constitution clearly spells out. This whole Supreme Court case is political theater.
Even if the court takes this case on (big if, with any Pontius Pilate court), the very best outcome we could expect is at the court says: "Hey, state legislators. Get off your ass and vote for electors."
Which is exactly what the State Legislatures could do right now. Truly mad.
Checkmate!
Marc Elias: "I can't believe I never heard of this."
So, unelected rogue election officials, members of the executive branch, and partisan judges can't willy nilly make laws to benefit one part of the population at the expense of the other based on political ideology during an election? Okay, good to know. Thank you, Supreme Court.😃
I live in a very liberal area. I better start boarding up my windows.
Figure out your escape now. I would
Does this have any bearing on that Wisconsin hearing today? sounded like the judge was cucking out
Then why in the hell wasn't that their ruling in the Pennsylvania case before the election?
There was no PA case before election
The only paragraph that matters is parapraph 3. Who makes election laws.
SO We Won Even Before The SCOTUS Hears The Texas Case. LMAO! Dumbasses are going to get Rekt by the SCOTUS!
I am so feeling the WIN now.
Well can someone fucking explain it to me!?
Where are all the definite after polls ballots at? What is the “boom” here?
PA says they stopped when Alito said segregate. They all counted for days but did they accept new without a doubt?
Alito will want to hear the Pa case after this one. They fkd with his order and ignored it. You don't blow off a scotus order.
But the Texas case deals with that saying PA you shit in your bed lie in it. Ie
You were ordered to segregate ballots, now we will never be able to call your election fair, or know who actually won, therefore, the Constitution says your legislature gets to vote what they believe was the will of the people.
PA in their response said they did segregate the ballots. Do we have proof they did not?
If we take them at their word they directly violated the written order of a Supreme Court Justice. Wonder how pissed Alito is...
BOOM!
They should have changed the law when Bush was president.
Is that cited in any of our suits
Not sure. Probably need to do a control f through each suit.
Precedent
Since, am not American if Supreme Court ruling back in October that absentee ballots was not supposed to counted after November 3 why they still count in New York and battle ground states?