Almost feels like whoever drafted this hasn't actually read the TX lawsuit. They are litigating against what they think the case is about, not what TX actually argued.
Can you imagine the Pandora's Box this will open if the Supreme Court buys this argument? State judiciaries passing unconstitutional laws weeks before elections without going through the legislatures. At that point, why even have legislatures?
That’s about what I got out of it. Granted I’m sure they cite sources to back up their claims too, it’s not a good intro. Using wording like “bogus claims” blows my mind. It’s like it was written for the average viewer of CNN to understand but not suitable for a the Supreme Court
Almost feels like whoever drafted this hasn't actually read the TX lawsuit. They are litigating against what they think the case is about, not what TX actually argued.
Can you imagine the Pandora's Box this will open if the Supreme Court buys this argument? State judiciaries passing unconstitutional laws weeks before elections without going through the legislatures. At that point, why even have legislatures?
That’s about what I got out of it. Granted I’m sure they cite sources to back up their claims too, it’s not a good intro. Using wording like “bogus claims” blows my mind. It’s like it was written for the average viewer of CNN to understand but not suitable for a the Supreme Court