9395
Comments (492)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
bangbus 1 point ago +1 / -0

And whom do you think applies the facts to the law to determine whether the legal process should commence?

1
stonepony 1 point ago +1 / -0

The police. That's why we call them law enforcement. They actually take an oath to that effect. In this case, they had no evidence of any crime to justify an arrest.

Prosecutors do not have the discretion to file bullshit charges for political motives. That's why this prosecutor was dismissed.

That's why Kyle will win a big fat civil suit settlement. Because his rights were violated.

1
bangbus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sir/Ma’am/Xir - the police have power to arrest you. On any serious crime, the prosecutor must decide whether to press charges. Very serious crimes even must be referred to a grand jury. The police have very little authority once an arrest is made.

Take, for instance, the recent case of Juicy Smolay in Chicago. Every cop there wanted him prosecuted. The DA, Kim Foxx, declined to press serious charges. The same shit is happening with these BLM “protestors” in a bunch of liberal cities. The cops arrest people and prosecutors decline to pursue the cases.

The Marxists have really infiltrated this process. Local elections are highly critical. Vote in them. Keep soft on crime Marxist DAs out of power.

1
stonepony 1 point ago +1 / -0

And some cops plant evidence or lie to facilitate a bogus arrest.

I'm only talking about what the law says, not what corrupt "law enforcement" do.

Neither the police nor the DA have the right to use their discretion to violate your rights or ignore the law.

Kyle never should have been arrested. According to the law.