Dr. Tarver, from the Michigan hearing I think, has just joined as a plaintiff. I would think that every legal voter who voted in this election would have standing. But I'm not a lawyer, so...
There is no Eleventh Amendment bar to the inter-
vention by a private party whose rights are affected
by an original action between States. See, Maryland
v. Louisiana, 451 U.S. 725, 745, fn. 21 (1981) (“[I]t is
not unusual to permit intervention of private parties
in original actions”); Arizona v. California, 460 U.S.
605, 614 ([O]ur judicial power over the controversy is
not enlarged by granting leave to intervene, and the
States’ sovereign immunity, protected by the Eleventh
Amendment, is not compromised”
Dr. Tarver, from the Michigan hearing I think, has just joined as a plaintiff. I would think that every legal voter who voted in this election would have standing. But I'm not a lawyer, so...
FWIW, the lawsuit itself states: