2795
posted ago by SheikFromMozambake ago by SheikFromMozambake +2796 / -1

With the facts and law on our side, and a conservative majority, I'm almost certain that we'll win this case. The nonsensical responses of the defendant states makes me think we could get a 9-0 ruling, which would be awesome for America. Lefty justices can make some terrible decisions but, in this case, I don't think they can do that without doing severe harm to their personal legacies. I honestly hope the lefties on the SC have some integrity left in them. It would be great to be able to respond to "Trump stole the election." with "The SC ruled 9-0."

Comments (229)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
48
Tucso 48 points ago +48 / -0

No way the Leftists go with 9-0 it will be 6-3 if Roberts doesn’t puss out

38
manmadegod 38 points ago +38 / -0

He is 100% a puss out in ALL cases. He is a shame and a sham judge.

14
LockeThePatriot 14 points ago +14 / -0

Wasn't the October election case that went before SCOTUS 6-3? Roberts just might step up.

11
touchmystuffIkillyou 11 points ago +11 / -0

5-3, Barrett was not on that.

7
Stylishman 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wasnt it 5-3? Seems like so long ago ha

5
LockeThePatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, I think you're right. I forgot Barrett didn't weigh in.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
touchmystuffIkillyou 3 points ago +3 / -0

He voted with majority in October on a case with similar issues. 5-3

2
hansgruber7 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand how any one holds out any hope for Roberts on this. Were people not paying attention when he enabled the PA corruption by supporting their illegal moves to accept ballots after the election and not match signatures? He voted for that. Of course he will continue to support the fraud. Stop being delusional. Fortunately, we don't need him anymore.

1
Redpillhope 1 point ago +1 / -0

Back when Dubya appointed him to the court as Chief I thought it strange. Why was the brand new Justice put in as chief I wondered.

14
NoTimeToBleed 14 points ago +14 / -0

Roberts will call this election a tax and therefore it's perfectly legal. We've seen it before.

8
SheikFromMozambake [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hilarious. Can't argue with you.

11
Tokens_Worth 11 points ago +11 / -0

I wouldnt be so sure.
With POTUS evidence, and with the retarded retorts by the left, 9-0 is still an option.

5
human_centipede 5 points ago +5 / -0

9-0 is effectively the same as 5-4; both paths are victory.

The SCOTUS might decide to go 9-0 for some sort of unity.

bwhwhwhwhahahahaaa - sorry!, Seriously though, it's gonna be a victory for us followed Antifas getting stomped for a night until the National guard is sent it.