With the facts and law on our side, and a conservative majority, I'm almost certain that we'll win this case. The nonsensical responses of the defendant states makes me think we could get a 9-0 ruling, which would be awesome for America. Lefty justices can make some terrible decisions but, in this case, I don't think they can do that without doing severe harm to their personal legacies. I honestly hope the lefties on the SC have some integrity left in them. It would be great to be able to respond to "Trump stole the election." with "The SC ruled 9-0."
Comments (229)
sorted by:
Simply saying bullshit is not much of an argument. Perhaps you could advance an alternative scenario that you find more plausible?
To even begin talking about a military coup you have to have the military on board in a substantial capacity.
We aren't even close to this in any way shape or form. Most of the senior brass are all DC establishment types and you're completely dreaming if you think they're on our side.
Lol. You don't seem to have a clue about logic or burden of proof. Are you a Qtard? The onus isn't on me to disprove your absurd, nonsensical claims, it's on you to prove them or at least provide a shred of real evidence to support them.
As Hitchens so accurately said, "Extraordinary claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence".
Wow. I offered an opinion, a guess, a prediction. You get all sweaty and hot slamming a comment on a post and start throwing ad hominem crap all over the place. I made no claim. I asserted no fact. I stated an opinion about a possible outcome to currently unknowable future events.
I do not follow Q. I find all of that too cryptic and unhelpful.
I do find it amusing that you lean on the most common and least defensible form of fallacy while accusing me of lacking knowledge of logic.
We are not in court and I owe you no burden of proof.
Twat.