25 I've always considered this to be segregation under another name. Why separate history by race? (twitter.com) posted 128 days ago by slowmotrin 128 days ago by slowmotrin +25 / -0 7 comments share 7 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (7) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 4 ▼ – NuclearRocks1 4 points 128 days ago +5 / -1 Maybe American history first ? permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – mariod818 2 points 128 days ago +2 / -0 i dont know as a Hispanic i could care less about Latin studies. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – MountainViolinist 1 point 128 days ago +1 / -0 Raycist permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – slag 2 points 128 days ago +2 / -0 Hmm, separate but equal inherently unequal? I guess if they're electives maybe (e.g. kids aren't forced by race). permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – slowmotrin [S] 1 point 128 days ago +1 / -0 I could have sworn that I had classes like this as electives in high school, maybe I am mistaken. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – captsamnick 1 point 128 days ago +1 / -0 Back in my day we just called it Spanish class permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 128 days ago +1 / -0
Maybe American history first ?
i dont know as a Hispanic i could care less about Latin studies.
Raycist
Hmm, separate but equal inherently unequal? I guess if they're electives maybe (e.g. kids aren't forced by race).
I could have sworn that I had classes like this as electives in high school, maybe I am mistaken.
Back in my day we just called it Spanish class