That was when Man of the Year was not an endorsement but the person with the most significance on the world stage who was influencing events to their agenda, good or bad. Stalin and Khomeini were also Man of the year.
The article appearing that year was not speaking about Hitler in laudatory terms at all.
That's exactly what it should be and with that said it would have been DJT for 5 years in a row because that is ALL every news media in every country talked about whenever he did ANYTHING.
Sometime they do, sometime they don’t. https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/0520b2eddeaa5855321a4f05994a655e
That was when Man of the Year was not an endorsement but the person with the most significance on the world stage who was influencing events to their agenda, good or bad. Stalin and Khomeini were also Man of the year.
The article appearing that year was not speaking about Hitler in laudatory terms at all.
Probably an unpopular opinion, but that's the way it should be
That's exactly what it should be and with that said it would have been DJT for 5 years in a row because that is ALL every news media in every country talked about whenever he did ANYTHING.