It's called growing a pair. Either you believe in a person's Constitutional right to free speech (whether you agree with their words or not) or you don't.
The Constitution isn't a savior of western civ in some instances and just a piece of parchment in other instances when you don't like a naughty word or when you're afraid of being called a name.
Understanding the importance of the document and supporting even it's most extreme (yet still legal) of implementations is the only way our Constitution survives unscathed. Hypocrisy be thy name.
Be a Lion, not a faggot.
EDIT: Downvote this all you want because your fragile feefee's got bruised, but just know that you're a hypocrite. GOOD ISN'T JUST GOOD WHEN IT'S GOOD FOR YOU.The irony of saying "retards" in the OP title, but then getting butthurt over someone else's Jew comment is laughably silly. Typical water-carrying PC mentality.
Thank you. Some of the normies this site has attracted have me concerned. Milque-toast opinions are fine, but what the hell could possibly be controversial about understanding how the Constitution works and whole-heartedly supporting what it is?
"lol" No one above made an argument about the ToS. They simply said "but muh feelings and muh namecalling"...a perspective to which I am vehemently opposed. Maybe learn how to have a conversation without conflating two very different points.
Think before you speak and your arguments may end up being substantive. Or don't and continue looking like a hyper-emotional dullard who's incapable of deductive reasoning.
And you sound exactly like everyone on this site trying to make a non-argument based on feelings sounds.
You have zero argument of substance so you resort to lame-duck nonsense to distract from the fact that you have no argument of substance...all while using sarcastic faggotry like "lol" in a poor attempt to discredit the other person's valid point. Either dispute the argument or don't. "Lol" is not an argument despite what your social media echo chambers seem to have taught you.
We get it, you're not bright.Try harder. You're embarrassing yourself.
A death threat wouldn't qualify as free speech, therefore, I'd use the deport button. I'd do the same for corporate spamming because advertising on a place like this is silly and it clogs up the threads. Seems simple enough. If someone says something I don't like, I'll either have a discussion with them or ignore it... because I'm an adult.
I never said whether or not I support a specific statement. I said that I support the Constitution...as any Trump supporter should. How this could possibly be misconstrued as controversial in AMERICA, I'll never know.
Imagine downvoting someone for supporting the Constitution. We certainly do live in a society. Again, have some self-awareness.
I agree with you here, personally I never bought the entire Jews ruined the world narrative, but if one wants to then so be it..At the risk of being called a faggot I'll say this, we know how much power the mob has, we know that they can go after web hosting and take us down that way..We can have our own servers, but without DNS it's a moot point.
So I can understand the general worry, things are about to go from hot to nuclear over the coming days to weeks, and they will absolutely be looking to take out any media forum that Trump's base could use to organize or relay information.
I definitely agree with you. I was only making a point that this constant fear of being called "the r word" is disgusting. Now we have to be afraid of that accusation just because someone said something that we may not even agree with in our general vicinity?
People can fuck right off with that. We stand our ground and we never kowtow. When you let them inch you out, you always lose. When they get in your face, stay planted like a tree or knock them back.
Lions are the kings of the jungle. Proud of your boy.👌🍻
How about a harsh criticism of President Trump? Would that be free speech? Would you deport? If you said no then you dont understand what this site is about.
You don't get to tell me what I do and don't understand just because you're fragile. If the person's criticism was legitimate, I'd hear it out and have a debate or discussion because I'm not a tribal idiot with tunnel vision.
If the person was trolling, I'd ignore it and move on because I'm an adult, not an overgrown child. Seems like common sense.
I love my President because of his policies, not because of his celebrity. Stop pretending like he's incapable of doing wrong. If he ever issued gun control or became complacent with identity politics, I'd harshly criticize him. Thankfully, he seems to have more sense than that.
You're not in court. The Constitution prevents the government from violating your rights. It doesn't prevent people from curating private forums. Most people don't like the ProtocolFags, and the site rules reflect that. Your appeal to the Constitution is entirely external to the issue at hand.
Again, no one here referenced "site rules". The argument made above was "don't let them call us rayciss". If you want to participate in the conversation then at least keep up. See above:
Did you just try to imply with a straight face that the Constitution only applies in court?
Also, I couldn't give a fuck less who likes me or not. I don't know you nor do I really care to. You're just words on a screen.
Stop asserting that it's "MY" garbage, you fucking dimwit.
The point is either you support your Constitution or you don't. Supporting free speech doesn't mean that you support the words being spoken. Picking and choosing what's acceptable outside of what's based on LAW is how people use the Constitution AGAINST you eventually.
Non-mongoloids usually understand this. Keep using the leftist tactic of "anyone I disagree with is rayciss" though, especially when I never claimed to be in support of any anti-semitism.
It's called growing a pair. Either you believe in a person's Constitutional right to free speech (whether you agree with their words or not) or you don't.
The Constitution isn't a savior of western civ in some instances and just a piece of parchment in other instances when you don't like a naughty word or when you're afraid of being called a name.
Understanding the importance of the document and supporting even it's most extreme (yet still legal) of implementations is the only way our Constitution survives unscathed. Hypocrisy be thy name.
Be a Lion, not a faggot.
EDIT: Downvote this all you want because your fragile feefee's got bruised, but just know that you're a hypocrite. GOOD ISN'T JUST GOOD WHEN IT'S GOOD FOR YOU. The irony of saying "retards" in the OP title, but then getting butthurt over someone else's Jew comment is laughably silly. Typical water-carrying PC mentality.
Have some self-awareness.
OP-faggot. Lol
It's the law. OP is a faggot until he's not a faggot.
This!
Thank you. Some of the normies this site has attracted have me concerned. Milque-toast opinions are fine, but what the hell could possibly be controversial about understanding how the Constitution works and whole-heartedly supporting what it is?
How do those Black Lives Matter dollars spend? Just as good as the real thing?
What the fuck does that even mean? If you're gonna be dumb then at least try to be funny.
Lol maybe take a peek at the terms of the site you agreed to.
"lol" No one above made an argument about the ToS. They simply said "but muh feelings and muh namecalling"...a perspective to which I am vehemently opposed. Maybe learn how to have a conversation without conflating two very different points.
Think before you speak and your arguments may end up being substantive. Or don't and continue looking like a hyper-emotional dullard who's incapable of deductive reasoning.
You talk exactly like the liberal shills who got racial bonuses thrown out of D&D.
"Oh, I'm one of you, but this thing that's perfectly fine and normal, I don't like it."
BLM pay you well for that?
Lol you sound exactly like everyone on this site trying to make your argument does lol. Biggest caricature ever.
And you sound exactly like everyone on this site trying to make a non-argument based on feelings sounds.
You have zero argument of substance so you resort to lame-duck nonsense to distract from the fact that you have no argument of substance...all while using sarcastic faggotry like "lol" in a poor attempt to discredit the other person's valid point. Either dispute the argument or don't. "Lol" is not an argument despite what your social media echo chambers seem to have taught you.
We get it, you're not bright.Try harder. You're embarrassing yourself.
If this site is all about free speech what do you suppose the deport button is for?
This site is for pro Trump speech. Not joos bad or anything like that.
A death threat wouldn't qualify as free speech, therefore, I'd use the deport button. I'd do the same for corporate spamming because advertising on a place like this is silly and it clogs up the threads. Seems simple enough. If someone says something I don't like, I'll either have a discussion with them or ignore it... because I'm an adult.
I never said whether or not I support a specific statement. I said that I support the Constitution...as any Trump supporter should. How this could possibly be misconstrued as controversial in AMERICA, I'll never know.
Imagine downvoting someone for supporting the Constitution. We certainly do live in a society. Again, have some self-awareness.
I agree with you here, personally I never bought the entire Jews ruined the world narrative, but if one wants to then so be it..At the risk of being called a faggot I'll say this, we know how much power the mob has, we know that they can go after web hosting and take us down that way..We can have our own servers, but without DNS it's a moot point. So I can understand the general worry, things are about to go from hot to nuclear over the coming days to weeks, and they will absolutely be looking to take out any media forum that Trump's base could use to organize or relay information.
I definitely agree with you. I was only making a point that this constant fear of being called "the r word" is disgusting. Now we have to be afraid of that accusation just because someone said something that we may not even agree with in our general vicinity?
People can fuck right off with that. We stand our ground and we never kowtow. When you let them inch you out, you always lose. When they get in your face, stay planted like a tree or knock them back.
Lions are the kings of the jungle. Proud of your boy.👌🍻
How about a harsh criticism of President Trump? Would that be free speech? Would you deport? If you said no then you dont understand what this site is about.
You don't get to tell me what I do and don't understand just because you're fragile. If the person's criticism was legitimate, I'd hear it out and have a debate or discussion because I'm not a tribal idiot with tunnel vision.
If the person was trolling, I'd ignore it and move on because I'm an adult, not an overgrown child. Seems like common sense.
I love my President because of his policies, not because of his celebrity. Stop pretending like he's incapable of doing wrong. If he ever issued gun control or became complacent with identity politics, I'd harshly criticize him. Thankfully, he seems to have more sense than that.
You're not in court. The Constitution prevents the government from violating your rights. It doesn't prevent people from curating private forums. Most people don't like the ProtocolFags, and the site rules reflect that. Your appeal to the Constitution is entirely external to the issue at hand.
Again, no one here referenced "site rules". The argument made above was "don't let them call us rayciss". If you want to participate in the conversation then at least keep up. See above:
Did you just try to imply with a straight face that the Constitution only applies in court?
Also, I couldn't give a fuck less who likes me or not. I don't know you nor do I really care to. You're just words on a screen.
Dude you went full leftist..Sure you're not confusing us with r/politics
Stop asserting that it's "MY" garbage, you fucking dimwit.
The point is either you support your Constitution or you don't. Supporting free speech doesn't mean that you support the words being spoken. Picking and choosing what's acceptable outside of what's based on LAW is how people use the Constitution AGAINST you eventually.
Non-mongoloids usually understand this. Keep using the leftist tactic of "anyone I disagree with is rayciss" though, especially when I never claimed to be in support of any anti-semitism.
Are you suggesting you'd be fine with people talking about it as long as it was in support of the president?
For some reason I'm doubtful
People coming here to post their SJW fantasies instead of supporting the president are a detriment to the .win community