I appreciate this post. It's a good time to explain patent law.
There are more than three patents in this patent family. For this explanation, we only need to look at three patent documents.
US201562240783P (provisional patent application in 2015)
US10242713B2 (old patent applied for in 2017)
US2020279585A1 (new patent in 2020)
The old patent describes a general system of REPORTING biometric and epidemiological data about patients, including in the wider society. The title is a lie, and that's somewhat allowed in patents. Rothschild loves this because they love to use big tech to monitor us at every point. Also, I would argue that the patent itself is invalid on the basis of not taking a real innovative step and on the basis that this is just an algorithm combined with a business process. Furthermore, there is nothing invented here. It's an idea for an app that loosely ties to healthcare, but describes no particular technology. But a lot changed in patent law between 2010 and 2017 for software and business systems. Either way, it's a BS Rothschild idea that must have had some good lawyers to get the thing patented between 2017 and 2019 with a timestamp of 2015.
The provisional patent application is a pre-patent application that you file to announce your upcoming patent to stake your claim. You are encouraged to do this as soon as you are ready to bring any idea to the public. It allows you 1 year (~2 years for globalist patents. Not kidding.) to file an actual patent application with the US government. It allows normal people a year to get their idea fleshed out before actually requesting a patent. So in this case, they filed the provisional in 2015, and by using the global patent system they got 18 months and filed the true patent application in 2017. You want to have the provisional as early as you possibly can because it ensures that nobody after that point can claim that invention. So this Rothchild got his claim as if he fleshed out his idea in 2015. But it only lasts 20 years until 2035.
Now the new patent talks about COVID but it is filed in 2020. It is filed as a child patent to the old patent. It uses the same idea as the old patent but now it's applied to covid. There are two reasons they would do this. First, they get to use the 2015 date as the date of invention despite it being covid and not created by the Chinese until 2019. But this means that the patent expires in 2035. But getting first claim is more important than patent longevity. The second reason is that it is so similar to the old patent (literally same patent but a new "problem" to solve) that if it were filed separately, it would normally be denied due to it being essentially the same patent as a previous patent (even if it's the same person on both patents). If you own patents, they are still used against you to check that you aren't just doing what you did in your last patents. Patents are for new inventions. So this Rothschild sees the covid opportunity and files this child patent to essentially build onto the previous patent with the goal of solving the covid problem. He would probably like to say that it solves the problem of a rowdy society, but that cause cause some brows to furrow at the patent office. Maybe he'll file that child patent if they pull off their great reset.
So does this make sense why they could file the new patent with a "priority" date in 2015? It's not that they found covid in 2015, it's that they are using an idea from 2015 to allegedly solve covid. Either way, it's got "trust fund inventor" written all over it.
I appreciate this post. It's a good time to explain patent law.
There are more than three patents in this patent family. For this explanation, we only need to look at three patent documents.
US201562240783P (provisional patent application in 2015)
US10242713B2 (old patent applied for in 2017)
US2020279585A1 (new patent in 2020)
The old patent describes a general system of REPORTING biometric and epidemiological data about patients, including in the wider society. The title is a lie, and that's somewhat allowed in patents. Rothschild loves this because they love to use big tech to monitor us at every point. Also, I would argue that the patent itself is invalid on the basis of not taking a real innovative step and on the basis that this is just an algorithm combined with a business process. Furthermore, there is nothing invented here. It's an idea for an app that loosely ties to healthcare, but describes no particular technology. But a lot changed in patent law between 2010 and 2017 for software and business systems. Either way, it's a BS Rothschild idea that must have had some good lawyers to get the thing patented between 2017 and 2019 with a timestamp of 2015.
The provisional patent application is a pre-patent application that you file to announce your upcoming patent to stake your claim. You are encouraged to do this as soon as you are ready to bring any idea to the public. It allows you 1 year (~2 years for globalist patents. Not kidding.) to file an actual patent application with the US government. It allows normal people a year to get their idea fleshed out before actually requesting a patent. So in this case, they filed the provisional in 2015, and by using the global patent system they got 18 months and filed the true patent application in 2017. You want to have the provisional as early as you possibly can because it ensures that nobody after that point can claim that invention. So this Rothchild got his claim as if he fleshed out his idea in 2015. But it only lasts 20 years until 2035.
Now the new patent talks about COVID but it is filed in 2020. It is filed as a child patent to the old patent. It uses the same idea as the old patent but now it's applied to covid. There are two reasons they would do this. First, they get to use the 2015 date as the date of invention despite it being covid and not created by the Chinese until 2019. But this means that the patent expires in 2035. But getting first claim is more important than patent longevity. The second reason is that it is so similar to the old patent (literally same patent but a new "problem" to solve) that if it were filed separately, it would normally be denied due to it being essentially the same patent as a previous patent (even if it's the same person on both patents). If you own patents, they are still used against you to check that you aren't just doing what you did in your last patents. Patents are for new inventions. So this Rothschild sees the covid opportunity and files this child patent to essentially build onto the previous patent with the goal of solving the covid problem. He would probably like to say that it solves the problem of a rowdy society, but that cause cause some brows to furrow at the patent office. Maybe he'll file that child patent if they pull off their great reset.
So does this make sense why they could file the new patent with a "priority" date in 2015? It's not that they found covid in 2015, it's that they are using an idea from 2015 to allegedly solve covid. Either way, it's got "trust fund inventor" written all over it.