The group claimed Paxton took a number of steps to benefit Paul, whose offices were raided by the FBI last year. Those steps included hiring an outside investigator to investigate Paul's assertion that the FBI violated his constitutional rights during the raid.

Not sure how that is a benefit or how it relates to possible bribery. If the AG was paid by Paul to do that, it isn't bribery since the AG isn't using government resources to look into that nor is he using his position to benefit Paul.