2289 One anonymous whistle blower was OK to impeach the President of the United States but, 1000's of sworn affidavits of election fraud is not enough to investigate? (twitter.com) 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑 posted 125 days ago by kratomlol 125 days ago by kratomlol +2289 / -0 14 comments share 14 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (14) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 13 ▼ – IntrepidBurger 13 points 125 days ago +13 / -0 One anonymous second-hand whistleblower. He wasn't even on the call! permalink save report block reply ▲ 9 ▼ – Berticus 9 points 125 days ago +9 / -0 Correct, most important detail. Don't forget either, 1 month before all that bullshit hit they changed the rules on the reporting criteria from what it has always been, must be first hand source. permalink parent save report block reply
One anonymous second-hand whistleblower. He wasn't even on the call!
Correct, most important detail.
Don't forget either, 1 month before all that bullshit hit they changed the rules on the reporting criteria from what it has always been, must be first hand source.