I don't want this going back to those cowards. We are in this position today because of them.
The state legislatures all coward to their governors and secretaries of state to not hold full in-session hearings (half of the hearings were just informal "hearings").
The state legislatures all coward to their governors and secretaries of state to not call emergency sessions to raise the concerns to the fully body and public on the huge issues of fraud taking place.
They have, since day one, had the power to appoint electors. They don't need an order from the Supreme Court to do so. If your are pinning your hope on them finally developing a backbone now, then you are going to be sorely disappointed.
What is needed now is for those electors to be invalidated, or the election itself to be thrown out. The contingent election must now be activated as described in the Constitution. State delegation vote in the House of Representatives to select the President, 1 state = 1 vote.
You may not want it. We all prefer that isn’t necessarily the best solution. But Texas is arguing, very well by the way, that that is what the Constitution requires.
I think it’s good to offer the Court a solution which both complied with the Constitution and doesn’t automatically decide the winner. And giving them a choice of precedent supported options is good.
I don't want this going back to those cowards. We are in this position today because of them.
The state legislatures all coward to their governors and secretaries of state to not hold full in-session hearings (half of the hearings were just informal "hearings").
The state legislatures all coward to their governors and secretaries of state to not call emergency sessions to raise the concerns to the fully body and public on the huge issues of fraud taking place.
They have, since day one, had the power to appoint electors. They don't need an order from the Supreme Court to do so. If your are pinning your hope on them finally developing a backbone now, then you are going to be sorely disappointed.
What is needed now is for those electors to be invalidated, or the election itself to be thrown out. The contingent election must now be activated as described in the Constitution. State delegation vote in the House of Representatives to select the President, 1 state = 1 vote.
You may not want it. We all prefer that isn’t necessarily the best solution. But Texas is arguing, very well by the way, that that is what the Constitution requires.
I think it’s good to offer the Court a solution which both complied with the Constitution and doesn’t automatically decide the winner. And giving them a choice of precedent supported options is good.