1186
Comments (57)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
17
Well_Shave_MY_Taint 17 points ago +17 / -0

The publisher of Scotusblog says in so many words, I'm a knee jerk libtard:

5 glaring problems with Texas' bid to overturn Biden's win at the Supreme Court

This case is hopeless. Texas has no right to bring a lawsuit over election procedures in other states

  • SCOTUSblog publisher Tom Goldstein, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who argues frequently before the court
12
Staatssicherheit 12 points ago +12 / -0

That could be a possible argument if the PA, GA, WI, MI State Legislatures had not become parties/file amci briefs. They have. There is no question about standing now.

3
0rthogonal 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought it was only PA and GA state reps signing on. When did MI and WI legislatures file?

5
Staatssicherheit 5 points ago +5 / -0

PA and MI State Legislators are intervening parties.

PA State Senators and General Assembly with the Speaker and Majority are Amici. Along with GA State Legislators. I don't see WI anywhere. I was wrong about that.

6
BLMadeMeRaysis 6 points ago +6 / -0

One of the biggest lessons I've learned from TD is to always check the name, early life, and photo of a source. Finding the saboteurs of public discourse then becomes easy.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
WildSauce 2 points ago +2 / -0

That standing argument is totally meaningless with Trump intervening as plaintiff now. Trump obviously has standing to bring this case, even if Texas doesn't (although they do).

1
TheSwiftPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. Came here to say that account is cucked