"Michigan’s argument against the evidence of
irregularities in Wayne County’s election process
fares no better. First, Michigan concedes that, with
respect to the ballots issued pursuant to the Secretary
of State’s unlawful mailing of ballot applications and
online ballot applications—which also did not comply
with statutory signature verification requirements—
"there is no way to associate the voter who used a
particular application with his or her ballot after it is
voted.” Mich. Br. 9; Compl. ¶¶ 81-87. Michigan’s
“heads we win, tails you lose” defense should be
rejected. This is a problem solely of the Secretary of
State’s own making." Rekt
"Michigan’s argument against the evidence of irregularities in Wayne County’s election process fares no better. First, Michigan concedes that, with respect to the ballots issued pursuant to the Secretary of State’s unlawful mailing of ballot applications and online ballot applications—which also did not comply with statutory signature verification requirements— "there is no way to associate the voter who used a particular application with his or her ballot after it is voted.” Mich. Br. 9; Compl. ¶¶ 81-87. Michigan’s “heads we win, tails you lose” defense should be rejected. This is a problem solely of the Secretary of State’s own making." Rekt