1773
Comments (90)
sorted by:
119
Swagdaddy77 119 points ago +119 / -0

If they rule against Texas they’re saying the constitution doesn’t matter. If the constitution doesn’t matter then the Supreme Court has no power as it all comes from the constitution.

50
ProphetOfKek 50 points ago +50 / -0

Exactly.

35
nozonozo 35 points ago +35 / -0

If the SCOTUS doesn't rule for Texas then we are getting pretty damn close to having to expel the Shit Hole States that are ruining our great country.

30
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 30 points ago +30 / -0

Put another way, we're on the brink on Civil War. I've been in this country for 54 years, and this is easily the closest we've ever come to Civil War (in my lifetime). We are going to be at war in January, regardless of who wins the election.

9
becky21k1 9 points ago +9 / -0

so let the war come. Which side owns most of the guns?

14
Samdog 14 points ago +14 / -0

And we own the food supply. Good luck in those cities eating each other.

But yes everyone be ready to do your part. Farms and cattle ranches will need lots of people to help guard against theft and poaching from liberal city pave scum at the onset before we organize a system. This will also be how you earn food food for your family if you can't provide. All are welcome. All skills will be needed. Its Something everyone needs to be thinking about.

12
RedBlooded 12 points ago +12 / -0

lol yeah rememer when antifags said they're coming for rural America? hahaha bring it on faggots.

9
BeardedNinjaPede 9 points ago +9 / -0

Or when they tried to farm in CHAZ with a handful of unpotted plants strewn about on cardboard?

4
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm with you, pede. I'm just saying...you need to be ready for it. It's coming.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
2
littleman 2 points ago +2 / -0

We're at war with communists where ever they happen to reside.

2
MadMaxUSMC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not only that, look at the map. It's not state vs state. It's the whole country vs a few blue cities and regions.

2 men with 30 pounds of homemade explosives, some initiative and grit could cut power to any one of these cities and/or regions for a long time. Blow a few bridges in the mountains and supplies become very limited very quickly in some of these places. There's also hundreds of things a lone individual can do to disrupt critical systems and cause chaos. Not to mention we can wear masks while doing all of it without raising any suspicion!

Also do not forget Pedes, we are the mofo's who invented guerilla warfare during The Revolution. We are the OG's.

If you thought rooting Taliban out of caves was tough, wait till you try to root out some good old boys in the Smokey Mountains. Or wade into some Louisiana swamps. How about a couple thousand Montana ranchers? It's like that everywhere and you're going to wish you were in the desert hunting anyone but us.

4
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, imagine all of the uprisings we've seen in Portland, Seattle, Milwaukee, etc. Imagine that going on all across the country, especially in SF, LA, NYC, etc.

3
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, I'm guessing you haven't been watching your tv for the last 6 months. They've been smashing store, burning buildings, I think it's going to be much worse than you're planning for.

3
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 3 points ago +3 / -0

THey are going to fight by burning the cities to the ground. And then, we'll be in an economic devastation not seen in a generation.

3
I_lost_my_password 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just about as old as you and completely agree. I truly thought our country may collapse in 2008 and in hindsight, was nowhere near as dangerous a time as now.

3
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like, come January, we're going to be at war. Either Trump wins and they start rioting, rising up, and who knows what else goes on (insurgents in army, navy, air force, etc), or if Biden steals the election, then I think we'll have groups rising up all over the country. It's not going to be good either way.

11
sunlessmage743 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fuck that. Expel CCP agents and commie scum from our beautiful continent. Annex Canada and Mexico to prevent future fuckery by China exploiting our open borders with them.

BUILD A BIG BEAUTIFUL WALL ACROSS SOUTHERN MEXICO

5
paupertoapawn 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are a lot of Americans that will remain loyal to the CCP and great reset ideology.

6
tdwinner2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

NO. The Union is forever. We'll liberate the Fraud States.

5
the_sky_is_falling 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol... yeah, not happening.

The Union is not expelling any states out.

It's clearing out the Commies from these states and getting them back.

2
Slappysq 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. We reconquer them with tanks.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
BeardedNinjaPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm getting excited!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
JesusisKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wanna jack off instead?

We are heading right off a cliff

7
cyvamp 7 points ago +7 / -0

True, it is fucking Texas.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
50
CrusadingPowerUser 50 points ago +51 / -1

So the democrats think they are " the union "???

Laughable because their degenerate marxist satanic death cult marches around burning American flags...

See how well that goes...

14
deleted 14 points ago +18 / -4
8
Ogcarvattack 8 points ago +9 / -1

war of liberal aggression.

5
SKnows 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thats where you're wrong buddy. The Confederacy was formed a 2 months before Lincoln even took office. SoCar 15 years prior seceded and no one left with them. SC ruled secession unconstitutional They were leaving if he got elected no matter what, didn't matter about how he won because people 170 years ago knew how to run elections lol.

2
Rothbard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasnt lincolns second election fraudulent against him? I dont think they ran them great then either.

3
SKnows 3 points ago +3 / -0

show me the evidence

1
Rothbard 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dunno just like 100s of articles and in many history books. Im no presidential scholar. Just asking if that was the case.

http://www.thehistorybox.com/ny_city/nycity_vote_election_fraud_1860_article00837.htm

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/08/22/mail-in-voting-civil-war-election-conspiracy-lincoln/

4
Swagnon 4 points ago +5 / -1

wait wut. The south was the democratic party of slavery and after the war extreme racism that holds to this day.

There where a lot of good kids who died wearing grey that where sold a story of "northern aggression." However, that was far from the truth as it was just pissed off plantation owners that saw their way of life come to an end.

4
Rothbard 4 points ago +4 / -0

No he means as in the North were not following the constitution in the Civil war. The dems are now the ones not following the constitution. Therefore they are in the same position as the union.

Also pretty sure the civil war started over states rights. They abolitionist thing onlt came into it after the North wanted british help.

Ps Im not American. Just read a lot of history and that seems to be the case lookong at political speeches.

5
Swagnon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Got it.

Yes and No. The states rights was the souths position. But it was the states rights to decide on how the deal with slavery. They saw and knew what was coming and it was a LONG time brewing. Slavery was a hot topic in the US since its founding.

IMO the three big events that rose tensions the most. 1844 repeal of the Gag rule in congress. The Kansas Nebraska act of 1854. The one everyone forgets the SCOTUS decision ruling the Missouri compromise unconsitutional.

Lincoln did promise border states their slaves. So its hard to say if he would have abolished slavery even if no civil war happened. But Abolishinsm (im keeping my made up word) was coming. They where also proven right when the first chance he got and smell of victory at Antietam he signed the EP. I just so happened his Martial law declarations help cement that idea and him going back on his word to the border states.

1
Rothbard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sk thw border states believed him when he said nah we are just stopping the south having slaves you guys are cool. They sound as dumb as Chamberlain with Hitler.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Rothbard 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean? Im not Amerocan so not as good on US civil.war.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
BeardedNinjaPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Google, Wikipedia, and others scrubbed that information years ago. They say Lincoln was in the National Union Party.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
Sapphire2Sea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey now... I'm a yankee but I live in the heart of the confederacy. Don't kill me in the crossfire.

1
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, that's partly true, but then you'd be leaving out the west coast, which is probably about 1/4 of the country's population, and clearly Demorats.

-4
CrusadingPowerUser -4 points ago +4 / -8

What? This isn't a the south will rise again sub

19
deleted 19 points ago +20 / -1
8
Nomad1 8 points ago +10 / -2

I would not be surprised by this. It would not surprise me if they find a way to agree with TX and still give it to biden.

5
ValhallaGorilla 5 points ago +5 / -0

roberts.rules voter fraud is tax

1
tdwinner2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
tdwinner2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

One step at a time.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
4
tdwinner2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

They cannot call for new elections. They could in fact agree with Texas and yet fail to prescribe a remedy. What they can do:

  • nothing, not even hear arguments in the case
  • nothing - hear arguments then dismiss
  • nothing - hear arguments then dismiss but remind the legislatures that they can meet in session with no gubernatorial or supermajority requirement in order to name Electors
  • decertify the Electors in the Fraud States and tell the legislatures to do what they will
  • decertify the Electors in the Fraud States and tell the legislatures to do what they will and remind them that they may meet with just a simple majority for that purpose

Things the Court cannot do:

  • mandate new elections
  • waive Federal statutory deadlines regarding the Electoral College (the December 14 deadline probably does not apply to legislatures though)
  • force the legislatures to meet and name Electors
  • assign Electors
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
tdwinner2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, just LARP one here.

-4
Nomad1 -4 points ago +3 / -7

I saw somewhere today that Facebook did not even respond to scotus lawsuit. No idea if this is true. But if true then the fix may already be in. No idea.

5
JohnCocktoastin 5 points ago +6 / -1

Not sure what suit you are referring to...anti trust by the states? The FCC suit? Typical suits give defendants 30 days from the date of service to respond.

3
TurboFrogz 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think he’s talking about the 48 states that opened lawsuits against Facebook

3
JohnCocktoastin 3 points ago +3 / -0

I doubt they have a reply due for 20-30 days from date of service.

11
Shaffro 11 points ago +11 / -0

The Democrats aren't as powerful as they make themselves out to be. We the People are more powerful than they are.

4
x79q3pb 4 points ago +4 / -0

I realized this more than ever when the video came out about the dudes demanding to speak to their representative at the AZ capitol. Two lightly armed security desperately hoping the situation didn't escalate.

10
Cuckslayer2020 10 points ago +10 / -0

Texas AG said if states can't settle disputes in court what is to keep them from war? The supreme court has a duty to take this case and rule in favor of Texas

6
SKnows 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thats why we made the constitution. It's actually our 2nd constitution. States used to do that before 1789

2
Ninjatude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. The original waa called the articles of confederation.

2
SlanderousMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll get my Black's Law Dictionary

3
tdwinner2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Texas is the only State to have its own military besides the national guard.

Texas has its own Army, its own Navy, and its own Marines.

The TANG also has a huge Air Force and Army.

Texas has the Dallas Federal Reserve, and can print its own dollars if need be.

Texas could go to war against the Fraud States, bomb their Capitols and statehouses, and decapitate their governments. Texas could invade NM and AZ and occupy AZ.

And there's a lot of very painful things Texas can do to the Fraud and blue States and the Federal government short of war.

9
sir_rockness 9 points ago +9 / -0

Last time the Democrats were a bunch of oligarch, elitist plantation owners and business owners that on top of owning black people owned millions of poor white tenant farmers. They instituted a war under the flag of states rights but the problem was Abe flipped the script and turned it into a holy war against the immorality of owning another human being.

The civil war was the United States union in a holy war against less than 10% of the southern populace who owned most of the wealth. The poor regular folk got dragged along because they literally had their countrymen coming in and burning and murdering.

This time it wouldn't be anything like that. The entire populace of the United States has been disenfranchised by the corruption and fradulent election. Many haven't realized that due to propaganda. A small number just don't care. Some of you believe the battle lines are 50/50. They are in actuality more like 60/10/30... 60 percent disenfranchised and aware of it, 10 percent too stupid to realize it and 30 percent that don't care.

That 60 percent is spread from sea to shining sea. They don't ever take up arms, but when they do God and justice will be on their side... just like the moral argument for war was on the North's side last time.

And don't fucking mess with me on my understanding of the civil war. I grew up in the southern part of Kentucky... I've lived this history most of my life. We descended from patriots, union AND confederate soldiers and unlike the NPCs we are aware of our history and how we got where we are.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
FlyinHeadlock 2 points ago +2 / -0

SCOTUS only likes ruling on things that add easy fluff to their legacy. They don't like ruling on anything difficult. A rock band calling themselves the Slants or Penthouse writing a satire piece on sex with mom in an outhouse is about as far as they go.

This looks way too hard for them. They are all basically cowards and not defenders of the constitution at this point. They probably will need to be charged under Military trials and removed from the bench.

1
jgardner 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The Supreme Court is the supreme law of the land!"

"Yeah, ask Dred Scott and the ENTIRE CONTINGENT OF NORTHERN STATES thought about that."

1
cjcivicx 1 point ago +2 / -1

That is one STERN looking motherfucker.

He's seen some SHIT!

1
Pajanoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who is this gentleman?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0