7685
Comments (1290)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
178
EncycloPEDEia 178 points ago +180 / -2

Now the Supreme Court can act at "any time" - Jordan Sekulow

68
Doth 68 points ago +68 / -0

Give us 30 minutes to get some national guardsmen in a few key locations, 'cuz you all know what's coming as soon as SCOTUS strikes down the electors of those states.

21
Highball 21 points ago +21 / -0

I already bought a ton of beer to celebrate. But I'm sure liberals have a different idea on what's acceptable means of celebration.

8
Doth 8 points ago +8 / -0

The trash cans and Starbucks will never be the same.

We need some sort of declaration, of like, I dunno. A period of modified rule of law. During which people are warned that violence and acting lawlessly will be punished with force, including deadly force if necessary. Where Americans are given carte blanche to put a stop to any destructive commie bullshit taking place. Maybe with a bit of... Martial assistance.

2
MAGALOVER 2 points ago +2 / -0

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis passed a law on Nov 11th the business owners could shoot rioters to defend their businesses.

The rioters do not have to be threatening lives... just destroying business property.

Pew pew on you, jogger....

Got ammo??

3
human_warrior 3 points ago +3 / -0

more burn loot and murder i guess

2
_-Th0r-_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

We know Justice Kav approves

2
Highball 2 points ago +2 / -0

Truth!

2
pnwhomebrewer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Be careful pede I wouldn't be drunk if you live in the city if SCOTUS judges in our favor. Shit might go down.

If you're in the country have at it for a night though.

4
lurker247 4 points ago +4 / -0

A lot more joggers out on the streets to blow off some stress?

3
Doth 3 points ago +3 / -0

"We are displeased by the news media's characterization of current events, which we have recently consumed. We desire complementary retail goods as compensation for our displeasure. Should any citizens or structures bar our way to said goods, our wroth shall be terrible. Cheerio."

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Lovepede 1 point ago +4 / -3

As I read the constitution, it's not 270 to win, it's just half the EC. So will Biden possibly still prevail if EC proceeds without the four defendants? Ie 242/232. Of course it's likely that more states will investigate their election and correct the fraud.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
RussianAgent13 4 points ago +5 / -1

No it's 270. Without that Congress decides. (now there's different outcomes that determine whether the Senate or House decides, but someone else can clarify)

2
BurtReynolds 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m no expert but I do not believe the number 270 is in the constitution. It’s the majority of electoral college votes.

4
Doth 4 points ago +4 / -0

My understanding is that it's based on the number of electors there should be, i.e. you need 270 even if some states are prevented from sending any. But a law-pede would have to clarify that.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0