Comments (5)
sorted by:
3
GreatHumungous 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh WOW nice! Vax for a virus with 99.9% survivability will paralyze you, sterilize you, and give you AIDS! Wow nice job NWO! 😂💦

1
milonie 1 point ago +1 / -0

thats a hard claim, hope he has the biology to back that up. Ive been quite frustrated by what he has been saying lately, and i say that as a vaccine sceptic

2
OGpsywar [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Technically what he said is just reporting what Australian virus researchers said. So ...

Spez: here's a pic link from another .win post about it.

https://media.thedonald.win/post/rds0Zstn.jpeg

1
milonie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quick research update: The HIV tests seem to be postiv because the vaccine uses a HIV clamp protein does to latch onto cells. https://mobile.twitter.com/MSwift94/status/1337405282687782913 Since the original paper has been withdrawn by its authors, its kinda hard to prove/disprove anything here. https://t.co/SDZMGPVZ4m?amp=1 In order to gain the same function HIV has they would need the most important genes in it. Here a quick pic for the general structure of HIV: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_and_genome_of_HIV#/media/File:HI-virion-structure_en.svg Again, with all these articles coming up from different scientists, im at least highly suspicious of the vaccine. Definitely will try my best to avoid being forced to take it. But that does not mean that you can allow this blatant inaccuracies. Its annoying af, because it would be used to discredit valid arguments This is the other article Alex had in his vid: https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/76166/dr-francis-boyle-creator-of-bioweapons-act-says-coronavirus-is-biological-warfare.html If you need to refresh highschool knowledge, work thorugh this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_biosynthesis Update: Found he original non redacted version here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338957445_Uncanny_similarity_of_unique_inserts_in_the_2019-nCoV_spike_protein_to_HIV-1_gp120_and_Gag

1
milonie 1 point ago +1 / -0

when he quoted yeadon he said stuff that was technically wrong. mRNA changing your genome. mRNA is a temporary transkript of your genome. Its never in your nucleus. Even Retroviruses need enzymes like Reverse transkriptase, protease and integrase to get in there. mRNA are translated in the cytosol and fall apart there. He misinterpretes and comes to wrong or at best inaccurate conclusions. And Im not saying to take that goddamn vaccine, im highly suspicious of that too. He fails to get the real discussions up on that topic. Like the analysis for homology of s1 and s2 spike proteins with syncitin-1