14 Looks like Texas took too long to file. Pennsylvania cites Benisek v. Lamone (media.patriots.win) 💩 SHITPOST 💩 posted 78 days ago by BasedCanadian01 +15 / -1 18 comments share 18 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (18) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 8 ▼ – dataonly 8 points 78 days ago +8 / -0 So TX acts w/in a couple of weeks of certification start date, and within the time before all certifications are delivered. But the precedent they chose to justify a rejection ruling is based on a 6-year delay case? Makes sense <sarcasm>! permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Lurkers4Trump 3 points 78 days ago +3 / -0 Hold on, they might have a point. It's certainly felt like 6 years since the election, so we might as well count it as such. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 8 ▼ – patriot71 8 points 78 days ago +8 / -0 Ridiculous and addressed by Texas in response. permalink save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – Bronski 6 points 78 days ago +6 / -0 This means nothing. PA is stalling and attempting to hide evidence. permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – GreatHumungous 5 points 78 days ago +5 / -0 Looks like bullshit to me. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Bronski 3 points 78 days ago +3 / -0 It is bs. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – PelosisWAP 3 points 78 days ago +3 / -0 They had to pick between too early or too late. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 78 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – Winston 3 points 78 days ago +3 / -0 GO FUCK A MOOSE SHILL permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Billygoat65 3 points 78 days ago +3 / -0 Bwaaaaaaaaaaaahahahaha!! Shit post. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – MAGAA2020isback 3 points 78 days ago +3 / -0 I feel like "laches" is gonna be the new word smarmy liberals throw around to make it sound like they know what they're talking about. It's 2020's version of "emoluments clause." permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – TrumpIsTheVictor 2 points 78 days ago +2 / -0 Bullshit. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 78 days ago +3 / -1 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – Dogpile1 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0 This is the Texas response folks. Texas is making this point. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – TrumpIsTheVictor 1 point 78 days ago +1 / -0 Looks like we will have to release a shit load of prisoners if we use these retards' logic. permalink save report block reply
So TX acts w/in a couple of weeks of certification start date, and within the time before all certifications are delivered.
But the precedent they chose to justify a rejection ruling is based on a 6-year delay case? Makes sense <sarcasm>!
Hold on, they might have a point. It's certainly felt like 6 years since the election, so we might as well count it as such.
Ridiculous and addressed by Texas in response.
This means nothing.
PA is stalling and attempting to hide evidence.
Looks like bullshit to me.
It is bs.
They had to pick between too early or too late.
GO FUCK A MOOSE SHILL
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaahahahaha!! Shit post.
I feel like "laches" is gonna be the new word smarmy liberals throw around to make it sound like they know what they're talking about. It's 2020's version of "emoluments clause."
Bullshit.
This is the Texas response folks. Texas is making this point.
Looks like we will have to release a shit load of prisoners if we use these retards' logic.