14
Comments (18)
sorted by:
8
dataonly 8 points ago +8 / -0

So TX acts w/in a couple of weeks of certification start date, and within the time before all certifications are delivered.

But the precedent they chose to justify a rejection ruling is based on a 6-year delay case? Makes sense <sarcasm>!

3
Lurkers4Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hold on, they might have a point. It's certainly felt like 6 years since the election, so we might as well count it as such.

8
patriot71 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ridiculous and addressed by Texas in response.

6
Bronski 6 points ago +6 / -0

This means nothing.

PA is stalling and attempting to hide evidence.

5
GreatHumungous 5 points ago +5 / -0

Looks like bullshit to me.

3
Bronski 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is bs.

3
PelosisWAP 3 points ago +3 / -0

They had to pick between too early or too late.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Winston 3 points ago +3 / -0

GO FUCK A MOOSE SHILL

3
Billygoat65 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaahahahaha!! Shit post.

3
MAGAA2020isback 3 points ago +3 / -0

I feel like "laches" is gonna be the new word smarmy liberals throw around to make it sound like they know what they're talking about. It's 2020's version of "emoluments clause."

2
TrumpIsTheVictor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bullshit.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dogpile1 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the Texas response folks. Texas is making this point.

1
TrumpIsTheVictor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like we will have to release a shit load of prisoners if we use these retards' logic.