That entire Dominion digital adjudication thing reeked of potential for fraud. I'm assuming there is either no tracking of who made the changes, or they all were sharing an account. It let them literally put anything they want on any ballot that was sent to adjudication. They could literally scan a blank ballot and mark it for Biden. Total bullshit.
If you want something like that to be usable, it needs to have the user associated with their decisions, and things to be adjudicated need to go into a queue, and have the same ballot adjudicated by multiple adjudicators, and if there is any discrepancy it gets separated out for further examination. Anyone doing blatant shit like marking blank ballots or obviously changing votes would get caught in a heartbeat and then you can throw out every single thing they touched and put them in jail. It'd be so easy to do too.
The best solution of course is that you vote on paper and count by hand, and you do that shit in shifts until it's god damn done. No breaks, not bullshit.
Duh. There was zero oversight on digitally adjudicated ballots using the Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 software. Cheating at the click of a mouse.
Can anything be done now that they have all certified?
Yes, but "anything" is a lot messier.
This is going to be interesting.
Yup, put all the certifiers in jail for fraud.
That entire Dominion digital adjudication thing reeked of potential for fraud. I'm assuming there is either no tracking of who made the changes, or they all were sharing an account. It let them literally put anything they want on any ballot that was sent to adjudication. They could literally scan a blank ballot and mark it for Biden. Total bullshit.
If you want something like that to be usable, it needs to have the user associated with their decisions, and things to be adjudicated need to go into a queue, and have the same ballot adjudicated by multiple adjudicators, and if there is any discrepancy it gets separated out for further examination. Anyone doing blatant shit like marking blank ballots or obviously changing votes would get caught in a heartbeat and then you can throw out every single thing they touched and put them in jail. It'd be so easy to do too.
The best solution of course is that you vote on paper and count by hand, and you do that shit in shifts until it's god damn done. No breaks, not bullshit.
No fucking shit.
why are we labeling something that would be as "BREAKING" ?
My first thought breaking is for happenings, not would be's. Clickbait word.
No shit.
With all these adjudicated votes youd think there'd of been an audit or something....