939
Comments (30)
sorted by:
33
MaximusDecimus 33 points ago +33 / -0

Let's fuckkking goooo

16
MastaJoda 16 points ago +17 / -1

Stacking em up

5
tragician 5 points ago +5 / -0

Round em up

6
stabbingmandrill 6 points ago +7 / -1

Let's fuckkking wait apparently…

Response due January 11, 2021

2
Jakefoy92 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s telling for the Texas case though. They’re streamlining it...makes one think

1
Continue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do we know when we'll get more concrete info on the texas case in terms of the Supreme court actually hearing or setting a date for arguments or any injunctions against the electoral college vote proceeding? I thought something might happen today but nothing big yet that I see.

2
Jakefoy92 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, from a few posts, I gather their response will likely be at 10 am on Monday. I can’t confirm it, but Pedes generally have decent info, so that’s my concensus

23
Litehouse 23 points ago +23 / -0

More info... Wood’s lawsuit (which is basically the same thing Texas filed) against the GA SOS was filed on 11/13. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18632787/wood-v-raffensperger/ It was shot down by the lower courts for “lack of standing”. This is a big deal, if SCOTUS chooses to near this case and rules for Wood, it would say that yes, a voter has standing against officials who steal their vote.

2
FreedomSteak 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey don’t bring your wood too near the case XD J/k

22
TheJimmReaper 22 points ago +22 / -0

THE TRUMP TRAIN HAS NO FUCKIN BRAKES

7
DagnyT21 7 points ago +7 / -0

NO BRAKES!

18
ProphetOfKek 18 points ago +18 / -0

There’s a bunch of peepees that SCOTUS needs to slap hard.

10
Chuj 10 points ago +11 / -1

Wood is destroying democracy! R|EEEEEEEEEEEE¡!!

  • leftists and MSM everywhere
8
Futtbucker69 8 points ago +9 / -1

It's docketed, which is good, but we don't know if they'll hear it yet or not

5
KRM944 5 points ago +6 / -1

Exactly.

3
derzahl 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, docketed means that it is queued for them to hear it

8
Redpill-notCommieRed 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just one of the lawsuits that the media has been l laughingly calling a dismissed lawsuit. Ignoring the fact that the Supreme Court was the goal and that following normal court procedures is something law abiding citizens do. Democrats have trouble following rules or laws though.

6
thecave888 6 points ago +8 / -2

DON'T BE OVERCONFIDENT PEOPLE.

Remember the fuckery that was Obamacare?

Be hopeful that Scotus will do right by us but don't for a second think it's a sure thing because it is not.

Chicom influence is everywhere.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
stabbingmandrill 4 points ago +5 / -1

Response due January 11, 2021 ?

2
mrsc 2 points ago +2 / -0

At least it is before Jan 20th

1
stabbingmandrill 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's just how long we'd have to wait for a response from Raffensperger to the petition for a writ of certiorari (to see if SCOTUS will hear the appeal at all). Then there's even more wait time after that. Unless this case is expedited or consolidated into the Texas case, it will come in too late.

3
Jemmy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hell yeah!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Dale_Gribble 2 points ago +2 / -0

POG

2
Donlurker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice

0
OneBigMaga 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't think that most people understand what Docketed means.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
3
KRM944 3 points ago +4 / -1

Not to be a doomer- but this means the SCOTUS has received the paperwork and Lin Wood paid a filing fee. It doesn’t mean that they have decided to hear it.