5230
Comments (171)
sorted by:
248
wolverineTEDDY 248 points ago +256 / -8

Wait, who the fuck conducted the audit?

Just fucking release it to wikileaks

WTF is this 1984? WHO THE FUCK CARES WHAT THEY ALLOW OR DISALLOW? THIS IS OUR VOTE BEING STOLEN UNCONSTITUTIONALLY BY AUTHORITARIANS?

: )

I didn't even believe in the Dominion nonsense. I'm starting to change my opinion. This fucking smells.

88
deleted 88 points ago +88 / -0
3
wolverineTEDDY 3 points ago +32 / -29

I've looked into it deeply.

I do think that Dominion has elements specifically for certain regimes to run fraudulent elections. And I do think that the adjudication process should not be handled by a single worker with no oversight.

But I didn't believe in the Kraken train of thought that vote switching was largely occurring.

Now.... with the block? I'm not so sure.

66
FrogofWar 66 points ago +67 / -1

How? There’s literally tons of video evidence from multiple news stations where votes magically switch from Trump to Biden. Did these news stations all have graphical errors throughout the night regarding the same thing?

1
PezzShivers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think Dominion changed or added votes bc a recount would show that. I do think they processed hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes though.

2
FrogofWar 2 points ago +2 / -0

A recount done by whom...

1
keeponwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

While hooked up to the internet with remote connection capabilities...

1
PezzShivers 1 point ago +1 / -0

By anyone...

-8
deleted -8 points ago +1 / -9
15
Liberal_Tear_Addict 15 points ago +16 / -1

DEPORT THIS LASERFAG SHILL

28
Rumblebee 28 points ago +28 / -0

You should check out the state congressional hearings Rudy Giuliani has been doing. The expert witness testimony makes it pretty clear that modifying votes is pretty trivial and can be made difficult to detect. Fulton County GA had 100K adjudicated votes, If I recall correctly. In adjudication, the equipment operator can change votes at his or her discretion.

I think this is falling apart because instead of a well-oiled conspiracy, there are hundreds of schizophrenics desperately cheating any way they can, unaware of each other’s actions.

12
Pepbrandt 12 points ago +12 / -0

Agreed. Algorithm aside. Those machines have so many ways to cheat its unreal.

We need an entirely new way of voting.

3
Rumblebee 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the establishment will have to put on some kind of show to reestablish credibility in the electoral process. The swamp creatures didn’t even go to much effort to pretend the election was legitimate this year.

3
luckyfunk13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or, just the old way

2
Kaiheitai 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need an entirely new way of voting.

Each vote counter has to be seated with an observer, and the votes as they are hand counted must be in view of a webcam livestreaming.

1
Skogin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Foting (fake voting)

20
Burmeister 20 points ago +20 / -0

Its 100% confirmed hammer and scorecard was used. All backup by metadata and people who have reversed engineered the algorithm.

3
Gmama2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reverse engineering the algorithm convinces me, but not a court. They will need hard evidence, not just look at this, it is weird.

4
Redpillgirlfrommars 4 points ago +7 / -3

They do have hard evidence, it's currently being blocked by Michigan's AG.

4
Gmama2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Leak it. Democrats do. Make your computer password Hunter02 put in in a dropbox for "safekeeping" and claim it was hacked. These guys are white hat hackers, They can do a little white on white hacking.

1
keeponwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leaked evidence may not be admissible in future court cases though because they’ll claim it was modified etc.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Gmama2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only if a judge sees it.

Hell there is a video of them ballot stuffing and they claim it is debunked.

1000 affidavits, etc.

14
Filo76 14 points ago +15 / -1

There is so much evidence of non dominion fraud it is staggering. This alone should be enough to overturn the fraudulent results.

However, it’s apparent that Biden magically gained over 15 million votes from the previous election and I can’t explain this. Is it all mail in ballots? Is there fraud in every state? Or did millions of Americans decide that a pedo living in his basement would make a great president?

Dominion/Hammer/scorecard are all I can figure.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
24
TowerLake 24 points ago +25 / -1

A guy got a court order to examine the machines and Michael Flynn’s firm was contracted to do a forensic analysis of the dominion machines on Antrim county(the one that switched 6k votes from trump to Biden)

Now MI AG is blocking the release of report because a corrupt judge granted her request.

21
GrizzlyAnonbatman1 21 points ago +22 / -1

Where the fuck is POTUS, why can’t he just fucking raid that shit?

2
12MoreYearz 2 points ago +2 / -0

A simple answer would be that he already has all of the evidence that he needs

1
Kaiheitai 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe he does.

17
ppalgansaek 17 points ago +17 / -0

Time to give them back some of what we have been getting for years. LEAK THIS NOW!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
12
NotJudging 12 points ago +12 / -0

Interesting. My problem with this is there might not be a "later." And we've seen too many things/evidence disappear when the doj gets involved.

6
fadelio 6 points ago +6 / -0

What the hell are you talking about?

Leaking the report won't affect the court case at all.

-2
Redpillgirlfrommars -2 points ago +1 / -3

My guess is they wouldn't want to release every single piece of evidence to the public so that Dominion/Dems will have less of an opportunity to cover up/explain/whatever if the day in court ever comes.

1
Kaiheitai 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this AG based or cucked?

-1
Redpillgirlfrommars -1 points ago +2 / -3

Likely cucked, as is seemingly every single person in a position where they're able to significantly help our case if they wanted to.

I should have been more specific and want to clarify as to not spread false information but my comment you replied to was my speculation based on my imagining we're in a parallel universe where it's being taken to court and the GOP has the evidence that they are choosing to not release for (i would assume) the above reasons. That'd be awesome if that was what was happening (admittedly I have no idea what's going on with it), but I'm sure it's just piece of shit dems trying to hide their fraudulent activities to fucking demented biden can win and china can assfuck them for another $10m.

TL;DR I have no other information other than the screen shot in the post and don't want to spread misinformation. IDK if it's actually being used as evidence or not, lol.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Ithrowawaay 1 point ago +1 / -0

wolverineTeddy: as in...Kaczynski?

79
Tx50bmg 79 points ago +79 / -0

"No evidence of fraud (because we'll suppress any evidence that surfaces)." - Dems

17
plastic_Strawman 17 points ago +17 / -0

^^This.^^

64
UnderCoverTrumper 64 points ago +64 / -0

I've been calling demanding accountability.

I left a message with Kelly Rossman-McKinney, Communications Director of Michigan's AG. I urged Michigan's AG to release the audit she was blocking. Kelly called me back and said it was "misinformation" that the AG was blocking the release of the Dominion information. So I asked her who was and why it wasn't released. She told me it was up to a judge and that her office hadn't filed to block the information. I asked who I could call to urge them to release the information and said she'd text me. Here is our text exchange.

Kelly: "Case is Bailey vs Antrim County before 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin Elsenheimer"

Me: "Hi Kelly, thank you again for your assistance with this. So to clarify, this judge is blocking the release of the Anterim county forensic findings? And it was his decision to do so and no one in your office ever filed to block the information? Is that correct? You are so kind to clarify."

Kelly: "No that is not correct. No one has moved to block or suppress the information."

Me: "So, just again, so I understand completely before bringing this to the public, in what way are you intervening on behalf of the secretary of state?"

Kelly: "It is asking the court's permission to let the Secretary of State be part of the lawsuit with Antrim County."

Me: "Thank you for clarifying. I hope you have a great day."

Kelly: "Of Course"

I then called Court to speak to someone in judges office. I left a message demanding to know who was blocking the release since the AG denied her office moved to suppress the information and said "no one did."

Waiting for answers.

EDIT WITH UPDATE: OK, Teri, someone who works for the 13th circuit court just called me back. She said it was her understanding (but she clarified it was her opinion based on the live hearing that she listened to on YouTube but is not recorded for our reference) that the audit is not yet done. I said, well Kelly told me it was done but wasn't being released because it was pending litigation with the judge (I was more polite than this). Teri said she can't speak to what Kelly thinks but it's her understanding as a private citizen no one is blocking it and that it hasn't been released because it's not yet done. She says we can't see a recording but we can order a court transcript (which she says is expensive). Black Box.

EDIT WITH 2nd UPDATE:

GET THIS, it gets wilder. I just texted Kelly back politely letting her know her story contradicts Teri's and Kelly changes her story to match Teri's because she "just found out Teri is right."

Me: "Hi Kelly, so kind of you again to help me understand all this. So I just spoke with Teri at the 13th circuit and she told me it was her personal understanding the forensic audit wasn't actually complete at all. Is that your understanding or is your understanding still that it's simply pending litigation in order to be released? Thanks again for all of your help clearing this up!"

Kelly: "She is correct. I found that out late this afternoon It is incomplete so even the judge hasn't seen it yet."

We part with polite formalities. So yeah, lying.

25
Brillica 25 points ago +25 / -0

Holy shit, this is more journalism than CNN has done in 5+ years.

16
UnderCoverTrumper 16 points ago +16 / -0

That is the nicest thing I think anyone has ever told me. Thank you, fren.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
16
Niburc 16 points ago +16 / -0

Good work. Keep us posted! Probably a dead letter through the weekend, however.

8
UnderCoverTrumper 8 points ago +8 / -0

OK, Teri, someone who works for the 13th circuit court just called me back. She said it was her understanding (but she clarified it was her opinion based on the live hearing that she listened to on YouTube but is not recorded for our reference) that the audit is not yet done. I said, well Kelly told me it was done but wasn't being released because it was pending litigation with the judge (I was more polite than this). Teri said she can't speak to what Kelly thinks but it's her understanding as a private citizen no one is blocking it and that it hasn't been released because it's not yet done. She says we can't see a recording but we can order a court transcript (which she says is expensive). Black Box.

6
GrizzlyAnonbatman1 6 points ago +6 / -0

So yeah, the fact they just announced Michigan was denied in court blows my mind considering it was just announced that Michigan is going to perform the comprehensive audit in Michigan history, oh yeah most comprehensive means the corrupt people that FUBAR’d the election are just going to investigate themselves and then suppress the forensic audit....sounds legit bro

3
UnderCoverTrumper 3 points ago +3 / -0

GET THIS, it gets wilder. I just texted Kelly back politely letting her know her story contradicts Teri's and Kelly changes her story to match Teri's because she "just found out Teri is right."

Me: "Hi Kelly, so kind of you again to help me understand all this. So I just spoke with Teri at the 13th circuit and she told me it was her personal understanding the forensic audit wasn't actually complete at all. Is that your understanding or is your understanding still that it's simply pending litigation in order to be released? Thanks again for all of your help clearing this up!"

Kelly: "She is correct. I found that out late this afternoon It is incomplete so even the judge hasn't seen it yet."

We part with polite formalities. So yeah, lying.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
UnderCoverTrumper 4 points ago +4 / -0

OK, Teri, someone who works for the 13th circuit court just called me back. She said it was her understanding (but she clarified it was her opinion based on the live hearing that she listened to on YouTube but is not recorded for our reference) that the audit is not yet done. I said, well Kelly told me it was done but wasn't being released because it was pending litigation with the judge (I was more polite than this). Teri said she can't speak to what Kelly thinks but it's her understanding as a private citizen no one is blocking it and that it hasn't been released because it's not yet done. She says we can't see a recording but we can order a court transcript (which she says is expensive). Black Box.

2
UnderCoverTrumper 2 points ago +2 / -0

GET THIS, it gets wilder. I just texted Kelly back politely letting her know her story contradicts Teri's and Kelly changes her story to match Teri's because she "just found out Teri is right."

Me: "Hi Kelly, so kind of you again to help me understand all this. So I just spoke with Teri at the 13th circuit and she told me it was her personal understanding the forensic audit wasn't actually complete at all. Is that your understanding or is your understanding still that it's simply pending litigation in order to be released? Thanks again for all of your help clearing this up!"

Kelly: "She is correct. I found that out late this afternoon It is incomplete so even the judge hasn't seen it yet."

We part with polite formalities. So yeah, lying.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
UnderCoverTrumper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel like we'd have to talk to the forensics team or their reps directly and see what they say? I'm not sure how to contact them/if that's possible.

5
beev_bove_biv 5 points ago +5 / -0

You were lied to. It is being blocked.

4
UnderCoverTrumper 4 points ago +4 / -0

GET THIS, it gets wilder. I just texted Kelly back politely letting her know her story contradicts Teri's and Kelly changes her story to match Teri's because she "just found out Teri is right."

Me: "Hi Kelly, so kind of you again to help me understand all this. So I just spoke with Teri at the 13th circuit and she told me it was her personal understanding the forensic audit wasn't actually complete at all. Is that your understanding or is your understanding still that it's simply pending litigation in order to be released? Thanks again for all of your help clearing this up!"

Kelly: "She is correct. I found that out late this afternoon It is incomplete so even the judge hasn't seen it yet."

We part with polite formalities. So yeah, lying.

1
Whirlybot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you keep cut and pasting your same response to each question? Once is good - (sent with gentle effect).

1
UnderCoverTrumper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, wine was involved. Some people asked for updates and I was trying to help get them new info but a DM would have been better.

2
Phrazel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amazing work!

33
tspan6081 33 points ago +33 / -0

They’re all SOROS puppets! But not for long...

31
Alpha_Lemming 31 points ago +31 / -0

What is the compelling legal argument?

18
kag-2020- 18 points ago +18 / -0

"What are you going to do about it?"

8
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yup, the CA Johnson type of argument.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Johndoe 4 points ago +4 / -0

This! 👆🏻

22
AngryAsian 22 points ago +23 / -1

Looks like we need one of those leaks that's become so prevalent

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
17
Red888 17 points ago +17 / -0

I can't tolerate much more of this shit.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
12
Drinkup4 12 points ago +12 / -0

Release it anyway. Fuck them. Shoe was in the other foot a Dem would release it.

12
Billygoat65 12 points ago +12 / -0

How can they do that? F’ing string these bastards up!

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
Hairy_Mouse 8 points ago +8 / -0

I said it once, and I'll say it again... WHO FUCKING CARES! Release that shit anyways.

"Oops, I had the report and must have lost it somewhere. Sure hope nobody publishes the results..."

*Actually, hold on... It said "to the PUBLIC". Does that mean they can use it as evidence in court, though? Or does it mean they can't tell/show ANYBODY?

1
Taupkek 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I WAS ON NYQUIL!!""

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
7
prodigal 7 points ago +7 / -0

now why would they do that?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
TowerLake 5 points ago +5 / -0

We need the judge’s number, the one who granted MI’s request to block the release of the forensic analysis.

3
DemDestroyer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Piling up the charges against them.... Need lots of firing squads.. serious consequences for obstruction and failing to do their duty.

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/10/judge-gives-benson-ok-intervene-antrim-county-election-case/3880872001/

12/10/20: A Northern Michigan judge granted Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson permission to intervene in a case questioning results in Antrim County and the security of tabulators used there on Nov. 3.

Judge Kevin Elsenheimer ruled Thursday that Attorney General Dana Nessel's office could intervene on behalf of Benson, who had argued she had supervisory control over the Antrim County clerk, had an interest in any audit discussions the case may raise and was party to the county's contract with Dominion Voting Systems.

The Secretary of State's office is concerned particularly with forensic imaging performed on Antrim County's 22 Dominion tabulators earlier this week by a Village of Central Lake resident and Allied Security Operations Group, said Assistant Attorney General Heather Meingast.

"We’d like to know more about what was obtained, what the intent is for the use of the images obtained," Meingast said, noting the disclosure of some elements of the tabulators could compromise their security in future elections.

Elsenheimer, a Republican former lawmaker and member of former Gov. Rick Snyder's administration, granted Meingast's request but warned the case would proceed in haste.

"I intend to move this matter quickly, aggressively," Elsenheimer said.

2
Psyop2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Disingenuous argument from Meingast claiming to protect future elections.

  1. She doesn’t give a shit about voter integrity
  2. The evidence is laid out in the Dominion user guide.
  3. She only needs to know what was found so they can lie accordingly.
  4. Covid.
3
DeboonkerBot400 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're saying they aren't done on their twitter fwiw, I wouldn't panic yet

1
Dth2Kommie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Source?

3
touchmystuffIkillyou 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well that's going to be appealed. These pissant judges are going to learn their lesson.

3
POTUS_DonnieJ 3 points ago +3 / -0

If there was nothing in it, they’d release it to make Trump look like a fool. Problem is, theres something very damming in the evidence.

1
manowar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep

3
Usefulmoron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just fucking release it, call it a glitch!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Bildcat 3 points ago +3 / -0

CONTACT MICHIGAN AG OFFICE AND ASK WHY THEY ARE BLOCKING THE RELEASE OF FORENSIC AUDIT RESULTS OF THE DOMINION MACHINES? IF THEY WANT TRUST, AMERICANS DESERVE TRANSPARENCY IN THE SYSTEM THAT COUNTS THEIR VOTE, NO EXCEPTIONS, NO EXCUSES.

Phone: 517-335-7622 Fax: 517-335-7644 Email: [email protected]

3
Katarina_Reset 3 points ago +4 / -1

Cause there was no audit

3
blueyedjonesy 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Because we don't want our cheating to make voters lose faith in elections!"

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
mcjit 2 points ago +2 / -0

THEORY on why they're so desperate to hide forensic audit results: MI is 1 of 6 states that offered "straight-ticket voting" (https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/straight-ticket-voting.aspx). It's been shown that misspelling "RepubIican" with a capital "I" (i) instead of a lower case "l" (L) in the voting machine's ballot processing logic for any candidate (e.g., Donald Trump) will PREVENT a vote from being cast for such candidate whenever a voter selects the straight-party choice for "Republican". This would also explain why there was such a huge discrepancy in a heavily Republican county like Antrim since most of their voters would likely select the "straight-ticket" option. That kind of revelation would be devastating to the Dems and would also show criminal intent on the part of election officials!

2
raynman33 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone has to leak it. Screw this judge. This is too important

2
Rwkp 2 points ago +2 / -0

It'd be a SHAME if this leaked 🌚

2
WU_HAN_FRU 2 points ago +2 / -0

Insurrection Act,

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
bubadmt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Release it anyway, fuck them.

2
jnic815 2 points ago +2 / -0

The evidence has to be really fucking bad if they will publicly say they aren’t releasing it..

2
Johndoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

On what grounds?!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Altairis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, apparently there were protestors that showed up at the (P)SOS' house. It'd be a shame if they were peaceful protestors.

1
x79q3pb 1 point ago +1 / -0

The worst kind

2
LOLFuckReddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s a good sign

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

T R E A S O N

1
Xanisor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just a normal process in a completely fine election.

1
EvanGRogers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our judicial branch doesn't give a shit. Buy a rifle and learn how to use it.

1
pup1pup 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just leak it!

1
A_Colostomy_Bag 1 point ago +1 / -0

LEAK THE REPORTS!!!

This is way too important to keep quiet!

1
Aoikaze2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do it anyways.

1
EricRyan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course they are, they know what's gonna happen when people see it

1
PezzShivers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Them blocking it seems fishy, but I doubt an audit would turn up any evidence. Those machines can for 1 beat an audit and two i'm pretty sure they actually counted all the votes. Of course they wern't all legit votes. Thousands of mail in ballots that people had weeks to stack up ahead of the election and they also just kept running the same batches of votes through the machines.

1
beev_bove_biv 1 point ago +1 / -0

MAKE HIM UNDERSTAND THAT WHATEVER DIRT DEMOCRATS HAVE ON HIM IS COMING OUT ANYWAY SO HE MAY AS WELL DO THE RIGHT THING:

13th circuit court phone numbers:

https://i.maga.host/7Qbxry1.png

Email addresses and phone numbers:

http://www.co.grand-traverse.mi.us/Directory.aspx?did=4

1
FagsBholesIdiots 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gosh! I hope nothing bad happens to them...

1
farangbak 1 point ago +1 / -0

FOIA