One Citizen: One Vote. PERIOD. We no longer have 3/5ths of a person
The days of that are over
THere are no "fracitons". If there's a fraction. EVEN ONE, including point zero .0, is flawed.
It's an enormous data problem that suggests that the process is flawed. There are no 3/4 of a vote. There are no .66 of a vote. or .01 of a vote
ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE
Meaning that we should be using WHOLE NATURAL NUMBERS
There is NO process where there should be a fractionalization of the numbers.
If there is math involved and you have 10 votes and you count 3/4 of that 10, then the .5 of 7.5 is dropped and should be 7
You don't Round (7.5 => 8, 7.4 => 7)
You Floor (the opposite of round 7.5 => 7) that way it's consistent, the fraction is essentially ALWAYS SPOILED
If you have a process that involves DIVISION or MULTIPLICATION, then YOUR PROCESS IS ALREADY FLAWED -- tell us why a process would even involve multiplication or division---it's already UNCONSITITIONAL because these processes result in fractions.
SOLUTION
The process involved in TALLY should ONLY include ADDITION
One Citizen: One Vote. PERIOD. We no longer have 3/5ths of a person
The days of that are over
THere are no "fracitons". If there's a fraction. EVEN ONE, including point zero .0, is flawed.
It's an enormous data problem that suggests that the process is flawed. There are no 3/4 of a vote. There are no .66 of a vote. or .01 of a vote
ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE
Meaning that we should be using WHOLE NATURAL NUMBERS
There is NO process where there should be a fractionalization of the numbers.
If there is math involved and you have 10 votes and you count 3/4 of that 10, then the .5 of 7.5 is dropped and should be 7
You don't Round (7.5 => 8, 7.4 => 7)
You Floor (the opposite of round 7.5 => 7) that way it's consistent, the fraction is essentially ALWAYS SPOILED
If you have a process that involves DIVISION or MULTIPLICATION, then YOUR PROCESS IS ALREADY FLAWED -- tell us why a process would even involve multiplication or division---it's already UNCONSITITIONAL because these processes result in fractions.
---
###SOLUTION
The process involved in TALLY should ONLY include ADDITION
THIS IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO JAIL EVERY FUCKING ASSHOLE INVOLVED.
liberal math
2+2=5
I watched CNN post their PA tallies from scytl live.
The ticker said Trump had x number of votes and biden had x number. The ticker rolls through and the same number shows up again but then flickers and suddenly Trump has 600k less votes and Biden has 600k more, exactly.
So that is flipping.
Then I learn they had to fractionalize the votes and that did not mean .33 of a vote when from Trump to Biden. It came from the down ballot. It even came off the resolutions proposed on whatever was on the ballot. We had a "make minimum wage 15 dollars per hour" reso on ours. And it got a fractionated vote. Those votes that went to biden came from EVERYWHERE. They simply could not keep up with the amount of votes for Trump cast in person.
White men are only .92 human per the libshit commies.
They act more like we're worth 0% of a vote
INTEGER VOTING ONLY, NO FLOATS
Okay, so let's apply the same math in the CENSUS: different %'s for different ethnicities...or noncitizens. What, this doesn't make sense and goes against the equal protection clause?
This reminds me of the "Casualty Count" on the Terminator's HUD in T2: Judgement Day. After he unloads the minigun on all the cops, his Casualty Count reads: 0.0. How do you have a fraction of a casualty? This is the product of Hollywood idiots trying to recreate the SCIENCE! Ooooo, gotta have a decimal to make it all sciency looking, although it makes no sense contextually.
When I saw the fractional votes, I celebrated victory
I've seen the data declarations, and it's just lazy programming (and design).
The voting system provides support for distributing a single vote among multiple candidates, because there are elections held that way in the US:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_voting
But, for a normal election, the field should be declared as an integer (or long, depending on the architecture of the underlying hardware). All operations should be simple addition.
If you declare a value as floating point, you can't guarantee it will remain a value that can be represented by an integer.
The problem: floating point arithmetic in base 2 results in small errors creeping into the result, especially over millions of calculations. And once a fractional error creeps into the result, it may not be able to be represented exactly in base 2, resulting in more errors.
If dominion has a single FLOAT related to voting instead of INTs, then DEPORT
Actually that’s a really good argument that could win.