548
posted ago by ghost_of_aswartz ago by ghost_of_aswartz +550 / -2

One Citizen: One Vote. PERIOD. We no longer have 3/5ths of a person

The days of that are over

THere are no "fracitons". If there's a fraction. EVEN ONE, including point zero .0, is flawed.

It's an enormous data problem that suggests that the process is flawed. There are no 3/4 of a vote. There are no .66 of a vote. or .01 of a vote

ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE

Meaning that we should be using WHOLE NATURAL NUMBERS

There is NO process where there should be a fractionalization of the numbers.

If there is math involved and you have 10 votes and you count 3/4 of that 10, then the .5 of 7.5 is dropped and should be 7

You don't Round (7.5 => 8, 7.4 => 7)

You Floor (the opposite of round 7.5 => 7) that way it's consistent, the fraction is essentially ALWAYS SPOILED

If you have a process that involves DIVISION or MULTIPLICATION, then YOUR PROCESS IS ALREADY FLAWED -- tell us why a process would even involve multiplication or division---it's already UNCONSITITIONAL because these processes result in fractions.


SOLUTION

The process involved in TALLY should ONLY include ADDITION

Comments (13)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
TwelveMoreYears 1 point ago +1 / -0

This reminds me of the "Casualty Count" on the Terminator's HUD in T2: Judgement Day. After he unloads the minigun on all the cops, his Casualty Count reads: 0.0. How do you have a fraction of a casualty? This is the product of Hollywood idiots trying to recreate the SCIENCE! Ooooo, gotta have a decimal to make it all sciency looking, although it makes no sense contextually.