638
Texas bringing the heat in today's reply. "Evidence suggests that Mr.Biden did not win legally, and Michigan admits it can neither confirm or deny the lawful winner." (media.patriots.win) 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by HoLeeFuk ago by HoLeeFuk +638 / -0
11 comments
11 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (11)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 10 ▼
– jnvsor 10 points ago +10 / -0

The response to michigan's response was amazing. Looks like they might as well have confessed:

Michigan’s argument against the evidence of irregularities in Wayne County’s election process faresno better.

First, Michigan concedes that, with respect to the ballots issued pursuant to the Secretary ofState’s unlawful mailing of ballot applications and online ballot applications—which also did not comply with statutory signature verification requirements—"there is no way to associate the voter who used a particular application with his or her ballot after it is voted.” Mich. Br. 9; Compl. ¶¶ 81-87. Michigan’s “heads we win, tails you lose” defense should be rejected. This is a problem solely of the Secretary of State’s own making.

Michigan also admits that it “is at a loss to explain the[] allegations” showing that Wayne County lists 174,384 absentee ballots that do not tie to a registered voter. Mich. Br. 15; Compl. ¶ 97. That is precisely the point. And it illustrates exactly why the Court should grant Plaintiff’s motion.

permalink save report block reply