The Dems constantly speak about disenfranchising the voters in the states that cheated but they never talk about the voters in every other state who those four states have already disenfranchised. SCOTUS should either remove the electors from the board for those four states or allow the legislatures to choose the electors. Let the people in those states who caused the rest of the country to be disenfranchised deal with their governors and election officials who caused their votes to be invalidated. My vote should not be diluted by by their fraud.
Well if they decimated it that would leave 90 percent of the case valid, so yeah go ahead and decimate it, means we still win. Learn the meaning of words dip shits, they can write an opinion but they don't know shit.
If these state are seeking to violate the constitution rights of the state of Texas and others, who else is there to go to for a remedy. These states have made last minute rules that violate existing laws of both the state and the federal government. They've ignored instructions issued by the court. These are rogue states operating outside the law in an effort to change the results of a federal election.
**Texas’ attempt to bring an original action challenging the election results in four states is not a serious legal claim in a legitimate procedural posture, for reasons that many people have already given and that I will not repeat here. **
Literally opens the article saying Texas' lawsuit is bullshit for reasons, doesn't bother giving any of the actual reasoning why it's bullshit. Readers are just supposed to take it for granted because this guy says so.
FYI SCOTUS Blog has no affiliation with the actual court.
Unrelated, but I actually did some contract work for them back in the Obama administration.They made more of an effort to try and curb bias back then at least...
It is a Blog about the Supreme Court not by the Supreme Court.
Not official government blog, just a blow hard LARPing.
Well aware of that; I've worked for them in the past.
They claim to be non-partisan though, which they're CLEARLY not!
The Dems constantly speak about disenfranchising the voters in the states that cheated but they never talk about the voters in every other state who those four states have already disenfranchised. SCOTUS should either remove the electors from the board for those four states or allow the legislatures to choose the electors. Let the people in those states who caused the rest of the country to be disenfranchised deal with their governors and election officials who caused their votes to be invalidated. My vote should not be diluted by by their fraud.
Well not only that, these states violated their own election laws, disenfranchising their voters as well.
Well if they decimated it that would leave 90 percent of the case valid, so yeah go ahead and decimate it, means we still win. Learn the meaning of words dip shits, they can write an opinion but they don't know shit.
Lol, yup.
Decimate away!
SCOTUSblog, yet another American institution corrupted by Communism.
Since it's been asked a few times:
SCOTUS Blog != SCOTUS. There is no affiliation, but they do claim to be neutral and non-partisan, which they're clearly not!
Let them know what you think.
If these state are seeking to violate the constitution rights of the state of Texas and others, who else is there to go to for a remedy. These states have made last minute rules that violate existing laws of both the state and the federal government. They've ignored instructions issued by the court. These are rogue states operating outside the law in an effort to change the results of a federal election.
Is that 'SCOTUSBlog' actually run by SCOTUS? I'm thinking no...
No! But they do claim to be non-partisan and neutral.
You’re right. No.
This is the very first line of the "article":
**Texas’ attempt to bring an original action challenging the election results in four states is not a serious legal claim in a legitimate procedural posture, for reasons that many people have already given and that I will not repeat here. **
Literally opens the article saying Texas' lawsuit is bullshit for reasons, doesn't bother giving any of the actual reasoning why it's bullshit. Readers are just supposed to take it for granted because this guy says so.
Donald Trump: Ripping the mask off of "non-partisan" organizations
They just spout off whatever they're told to spout off, by the people that give them money.
Trade only with states that supported the lawsuit
Charge them for impersonation of the court.
SCOTUS blog=/=SCOTUS themselves, and it's not run by any of their members.
FYI SCOTUS Blog has no affiliation with the actual court.
Unrelated, but I actually did some contract work for them back in the Obama administration.They made more of an effort to try and curb bias back then at least...