5020
Comments (137)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
65
bigrex64 65 points ago +69 / -4

WTF Amy Comey Barret? I knew she was a fucking snake, said it here many times....

20
matrik 20 points ago +30 / -10

Way to jump to conclusions and immediately jump ship. Did she even get a chance to explain her decision? Trump asked us to trust her judgment. I still trust her until he says otherwise.

26
BillBarrsSkelatons 26 points ago +29 / -3

Ok. So. Q should we still wait for the plan? Just sit by? Wait?

17
AmericanMonarchist 17 points ago +19 / -2

Or take a chill pill for twenty four hours. See what POTUS has to say. There is so much disinfo, psy-ops, and chicannery here that with any big event like this you need to wait for the dust to settle to see whats what.

15
BillBarrsSkelatons 15 points ago +16 / -1

If anyone tells you to “trust the plan,” and you literally don’t know what the plan is.

DO NOT TRUST IT.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
matrik 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'll wait as long as it takes for Trump to pull this off without bloodshed, minus the mass executions after he wins, obly.

4
Nickleback45 4 points ago +20 / -16

Bro, if the 3 judges Trump himself appointed turned down this lawsuit, I'm pretty sure they have a good reason for it.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Funtimesahead 1 point ago +1 / -0

The supreme court only cares about the court's image, not the law or the country.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
lucidthoughts 1 point ago +1 / -0

I really don’t think so. I think people are missing the point. SCOTUS didn’t reject the case based on dismissing the fraud, they MERELY said that TEXAS does not have standing to bring a case based on other states election results. That would set a very bad precedent in cases where the result does not benefit us. I still think SCOTUS would want to hear a case brought in the right way, but just keep in mind that they are BOUND to the constitution, and that is why Trump vouched for them in the first place, they are “constitutionalists”.