I really don’t think so. I think people are missing the point. SCOTUS didn’t reject the case based on dismissing the fraud, they MERELY said that TEXAS does not have standing to bring a case based on other states election results. That would set a very bad precedent in cases where the result does not benefit us. I still think SCOTUS would want to hear a case brought in the right way, but just keep in mind that they are BOUND to the constitution, and that is why Trump vouched for them in the first place, they are “constitutionalists”.
I really don’t think so. I think people are missing the point. SCOTUS didn’t reject the case based on dismissing the fraud, they MERELY said that TEXAS does not have standing to bring a case based on other states election results. That would set a very bad precedent in cases where the result does not benefit us. I still think SCOTUS would want to hear a case brought in the right way, but just keep in mind that they are BOUND to the constitution, and that is why Trump vouched for them in the first place, they are “constitutionalists”.