1474 posted 125 days ago by LockeThePatriot 125 days ago by LockeThePatriot +1475 / -1 54 comments share 54 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (54) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 5 ▼ – lordvon 5 points 125 days ago +6 / -1 this is the first scotus case, and you have to be detailed about the reasons, esp. when it comes to scotus. read this:https://thedonald.win/p/11R4JGEHkU/on-scotus-from-a-lawyer/ I think the other scotus cases have much better odds. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – GoingCamaro 2 points 125 days ago +2 / -0 I don't. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – lordvon 3 points 125 days ago +3 / -0 at least read the post permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – GoingCamaro 1 point 125 days ago +1 / -0 I did permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – lordvon 1 point 125 days ago +1 / -0 ok and did you listen to guiliani as well? he said they could easily refile under trump where standing would not be a problem. also split up the case. permalink parent save report block reply
this is the first scotus case, and you have to be detailed about the reasons, esp. when it comes to scotus. read this:https://thedonald.win/p/11R4JGEHkU/on-scotus-from-a-lawyer/
I think the other scotus cases have much better odds.
I don't.
at least read the post
I did
ok and did you listen to guiliani as well? he said they could easily refile under trump where standing would not be a problem. also split up the case.