4109
Comments (321)
sorted by:
390
Troll 390 points ago +410 / -20

I remember getting downvoted for saying she was a problem. Pedes, can I get my upvotes back?

189
deleted 189 points ago +194 / -5
128
Mamapedia 128 points ago +131 / -3

Gonads do not make a person. Fuck this we need a woman shit. Sexism is judging on the basis of sex. Picking a woman because she is a woman is sexist. Show me your intellect and your spirit, not your fucking genitalia. She was a wrong pick but any man would have been accused of rape.

77
Lemongrass5 77 points ago +78 / -1

Fuck this "let's give an olive branch to the other side."

65
dthb4communism 65 points ago +65 / -0

Republicans are Democrats lite. The ruling class are all trash.

26
Mamapedia 26 points ago +26 / -0

This

26
dthb4communism 26 points ago +27 / -1

Time for an America First revolt. Primary challenges for all establishment GOP. Even folks like Cruz. I don't trust them one bit.

31
Mamapedia 31 points ago +32 / -1

I am honestly to the point that I only trust Trump.

19
Mamapedia 19 points ago +19 / -0

A flamethrower is the appropriate response. Righteous indignation is holy.

72
deleted 72 points ago +74 / -2
69
Trumpfan1 69 points ago +71 / -2

GEOTUS got duped with all 3 of his SCOTUS picks. Might as well let dims pack the court. Alito and Thomas are on their own.

72
gimmeabreak 72 points ago +73 / -1

The shit that he went through for Barrett and Kavanaugh and the best opportunity that they get to say Thank you Mr. President, and they fuck him over. To hell with them. I don't really care now if they pack the court. It's not doing us any damn good anyway.

5
lash 5 points ago +5 / -0

Legal name fraud

15
Junionthepipeline 15 points ago +15 / -0

They will be off the court asap if the steal succedes.then 8 or 12 or however many they need come on and decide voting and everything else isnt really in that pesky constitution

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
32
Hokage_Trump 32 points ago +34 / -2

Here's counter upvotes. People forget that they act like the left themselves for not upvoting the truth.

I wasn't a huge fan of ACB but I was willing to give her a chance. (optimism bias)

4
Junionthepipeline 4 points ago +5 / -1

Me too

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
16
NerBolanski 16 points ago +18 / -2

I also got downvoted.we needed a male judge; she looks and talks like an SJW.

8
NoFucks2Give 8 points ago +9 / -1

She absolutely does. So many clues.

4
OccasionalCortex21 4 points ago +4 / -0

Should've known after she apologized for saying "sexual preference"

4
Joesf23 4 points ago +4 / -0

and how sad she was when st george took his feyntanal

5
Tantalus4200 5 points ago +6 / -1

I've never heard it once tbh

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
27
thebest2020 27 points ago +29 / -2

We needed the Cubana. She could have either fucked us or filled with rage that she would support America.

20
LiberalismIsTheVirus 20 points ago +20 / -0

No way she would have let this fucking communist shit run wild.

23
thebest2020 23 points ago +23 / -0

I agree. Still would have been 6 to 3 in this case not in our favor. Trump chose straight up constitutionalists. My guess is they saw what happened to that car blowing up with that young man and cucked out

8
Mamapedia 8 points ago +8 / -0

At the end of the day they are just people with families. Domestic terrorism is an effective tactic.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
4Godand4Country 4 points ago +5 / -1

You havent grown up until you've has kids no matter what you tell yourself. That should be a prerequisite

9
thebest2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

100%

Heck people are afraid of being yelled at for not wearing a mask because of the stories of people fighting over it and losing their jobs.

I walked into the store no mask like i didn't care.. normal shopping day. Nobody said squat.

Same here. That indirect threat really hit those who have many kids in the SC. Sad but it worked for now. They passed the buck to the next wave of Patriots.

Hopefully they will hear some stronger cases and that was just a bluff.

We should keep the pressure regardless

4
Yeow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Was sitting outside in front of my house yesterday without a mask and this cuck walked by and started screaming at me COVID PEOPLE ARE DYING! I just smiled and kept saying USA. This got him even angrier, waving his arms red in the face. Eventually he walked off in a huff.

2
Junionthepipeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup.

4
trumpslide2024 4 points ago +4 / -0

What we needed was them to get someone who was branded an 'evil racist nazi' and kicked out of Harvard for having a pair of balls. That's what we needed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Mamapedia 1 point ago +1 / -0

So true

26
deleted 26 points ago +29 / -3
19
America_2020 19 points ago +21 / -2

Well you got a point. She did adopt 2 black kids

7
halcyondream 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not only adopted two black kids, but imported them from shitholes. She could have at least adopted domestic black kids.

Then she cried about George Floyd... yeah if the Republican party wasn't filled with useless dullards they would have vetoed the nomination themselves then and there.

4
4Godand4Country 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was a tell for me. And her pro lockdown vote based off a pro vax vote from 100+ yrs ago thats no longer applicable

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-3
Ih8leftists -3 points ago +4 / -7

What would a different choice for ACB have done here or are you just crying about your fake internet points?

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Ameronaut 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alex Jones

11
zedrexvsyrex 11 points ago +11 / -0

It wasn't to avoid making us look sexist, it was to avoid another Kavanaugh hearing. Kavanaugh deserves to be thrown into prison at this point though anyway simply for being a cuck. Those rape stories probably were true.

1
MAGASpaceCat 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be very interesting to watch Democrats and Republicans support the impeachment of Kavanaugh, just for different reasons.

36
deleted 36 points ago +36 / -0
26
Troll 26 points ago +27 / -1

I already had him written off after the first time he fucked up (don't even remember what that was).

Trump's choices of people have been absolutely awful.

24
deleted 24 points ago +25 / -1
13
Troll 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yeah I don't get why he keeps putting these obviously bad people in office.

11
The5thEstate 11 points ago +11 / -0

Either an olive branch to McConnell and the other Repubs in Congress ("look, I nominate based on your recommendations, let's work together"), or the pool of candidates is so dirty that almost every pick is more often than not a slimeball.

I saw a lot of posts here on TD.W raising those concerns, only to get downvoted in a 6-to-1 ratio and being called "shills" and "Reddit plants."

7
Troll 7 points ago +7 / -0

The olive branch made sense at the start, but it is far too late to still be playing that game.

2
cptunicorn 2 points ago +3 / -1

I dunno, it may make a certain amount of sense... He gives them an opportunity to support him or be exposed. Exposing the roots of the swamp.

3
Troll 3 points ago +3 / -0

Time is running out to sow the fruits of such things, though.

2
cptunicorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

pretty sure one sows seeds and reaps fruit but what do I know

2
MAGASpaceCat 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Heritage Foundation chose Trumps picks for him. He made the mistake of trusting them, although it is nothing more than a psyop. Even Tucker said as much.

As much as I love Trump, there is no denying that he made a lot of mistakes while wading neck deep through the swamp. Even Bill Barr turned out to be a deep state asset.

7
oakkqs 7 points ago +7 / -0

Kavanaugh was in on fixing things for the Clintons. Not sure where Trump got all of his picks. I was a Mike Pence fan from his days on Hannity when he was a House Rep. But I’ve watched him be too friendly to Pelosi. So honestly maybe Mike Pompeo and that’s it?

8
Troll 8 points ago +8 / -0

Pompeo has surprised me, shockingly he's been one of the few better picks of Trump.

2
_-Th0r-_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

They aren’t “Trump picks,” they are McConnell picks.

34
Magapat 34 points ago +34 / -0

I always cringed so hard when i saw people post lasers coming from ACB's eyes. Did people really think she was going to be Thomas and Alito just because Trump picked her? Trump was 0-3 on these SCOTUS picks.

15
Troll 15 points ago +15 / -0

LOL! I was cringing so hard too! But I knew there would be salt in the end so I get some sadistic amusement from it.

4
RedSocks157 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not sure how it's amusing to lose the country

5
Troll 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have to laugh at folly sometimes. I'd rather this have not happened, too, but at least I can get some irony out of people being angry at me for warning about her.

5
Ih8leftists 5 points ago +6 / -1

Still better than anyone Hillary would have picked.

3
MAGASpaceCat 3 points ago +3 / -0

My trust in Trump's picks (recommended by the absolutely worthless Heritage Foundation) started to dissolve after watching Gorsuch and Kavanaugh cuck out.

I was absolutely livid when Trump chose ACB after he fell for the psyop pushing her. I knew she was an absolute fraud. She is a Pope Francis type that reeked of anti-American liberalism from miles away.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
NoFucks2Give 0 points ago +4 / -4

Trump re-tweeted a pic of her with lasers in her eyes, basically encouraging the justices to to do what is right. All that did - and this is GUARANTEED - is that it would arouse her inner feminazi to rebel against a man “trying to own her”.

Granted, I believe she would have decided same regardless, but that was a horrible psychology ploy.

Best I can say with that is he believed she herself would not see the tweet. But come on. “I’ll show you” would be the natural reaction.

Oh well, she was already going to decide against him so fuck it.....maybe he realizes what a mistake he made in nominating her and that was his only way to try and make a last ditch persuasion to her better nature. He should realize women do not have better natures when they see a man trying to influence them. They go full feminazi.
Every fucking time. Even with the best of intents from the man, they do not see the big picture, they just go into their narrow vindictiveness and strike out.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
0
NoFucks2Give 0 points ago +1 / -1

You must have married your high school sweetheart and never dealt with a lot of women.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
NoFucks2Give 0 points ago +1 / -1

Level headed based women on thedonald agree with me. So there is THAT.

And Sean Connery was right: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzXkbJwrN38

And level headed based women on thedonald agree with him (me) on that also.

The male justices he unwisely nominated are Bushies. That accounts for their faggotry.

My attitude is perfect. By the way.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
Tread_not_on_me 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yes you may pede. Fuck all the rats in the swamp

8
deleted 8 points ago +11 / -3
13
Troll 13 points ago +14 / -1

We can ask the same question to Bolton, Tillerson, Barr, etc...

3
Ih8leftists 3 points ago +4 / -1

Should he have appointed Garland?

3
FedUpAndReady 3 points ago +3 / -0

He should have appointed Rand Paul, Lin Wood, and Ted Cruz. In that order.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +3 / -7
89
Geeee 89 points ago +95 / -6

That's unfair to RBG

92
Reddit_is_for_cucks 92 points ago +94 / -2

Yeah, at least RBG was open about being a piece of shit. ACB stabbed us in the back.

57
Geeee 57 points ago +58 / -1

Imagine taking less than a couple of months between being appointed as a constitutionalist, and ruling that the constitution is practically toilet paper

8
RedditIs4Retards 8 points ago +9 / -1

I always believed democrats and Republicans are the same thing, just act like they're different.

Today, they once again proved me right.

I've had plenty people argue with me on here that there is a difference. So what's the difference then and where is it?

1
The5thEstate 1 point ago +1 / -0

The general theme was both "all Republicans in Congress are RINOs" and "Republicans will lead the way, win back the House, and keep the Senate" simultaneously.

That might be a bitter pill for a lot here to swallow, but starting to raise awareness and promoting new, promising blood in 2022 is probably the best choice in the immediate future (with the Georgia run-offs being the immediate concern, but certainly NOT the best option, given the candidates).

The main problem with 2016 was that it was basically a Trump movement, rather than a Trump-led movement, so he was fighting everyone, on every level because he had no allies, and a lot of the Republicans in Congress after the midterms were more willing, in general, to help Trump, but as they have shown this past month, they are fairweather friends.

18
jubyeonin 18 points ago +19 / -1

Uh, no. Did you read the Pritzker lockdown case? It was in the open. It was simps and shills who were downvoting everyone and talking shit about Barnes in the process.

-3
Ih8leftists -3 points ago +1 / -4

Barnes IS a piece of shit though, so what's your point?

1
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 1 point ago +3 / -2

You got anything to back that up aside from your opinion? Genuinely curious.

3
ProfessorOak 3 points ago +3 / -0

I keep hearing people shit-talk Barnes, but no one ever gives an explanation for it.

0
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is no explanation for it, other than fan-boys trying to simp for ACB.

2
The5thEstate 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was (and still is) very critical of the judges that Trump had nominated; yes, there are 300 judges, but almost all of them came with recommendations from the Federalist Society, which Barnes says that they have a stranglehold on judge appointment recommendations for the right. I can't remember when Barnes said it, but it was something to the effect of "if the case isn't political at the federal level, the judges will be pretty reliable" (so if a lawsuit is about state law, or a federal crime, the judges will be pretty reliable, but if the suit is about the election, they'll buckle).

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
6
NerBolanski 6 points ago +7 / -1

Conservatives should always stick to instinct.we needed a straight white man who was uncucked as a judge or Clarence Thomas clone.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
chesswhilehigh 3 points ago +3 / -0

She said that it was fair to allow BLM riots while still locking down everyone else and shutting down businesses. Never trust a woman to do a man’s job.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
-3
Ih8leftists -3 points ago +2 / -5

*you're

You dumb motherfucker

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
18
Equality72521 18 points ago +18 / -0

Same reason he picked Sessions, Barr, Bolton, Tillerson, and Mattis. He's been listening to the wrong people. The people advising him are not his friends and do not have our best interests in mind.

10
NerBolanski 10 points ago +10 / -0

I always warn people of Kushner ,Rollins and jarron smith.They are straight up liberals and they are in Trumps circle.

10
Equality72521 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yup. Bannon was the only one pushing against those swamp lovers. Which is why he left. Bannon was right and had both the Presidents and OUR best interest in mind.

0
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 0 points ago +5 / -5

Yeah right. Bannon is a barnacle on the ass of the MAGA Movement. He's still trying to cling to relevance so that he can continue his grift after his ignominious expulsion from the White House. Oh yeah, and he talked shit about POTUS on several occasions. Not sure I'd want to hitch my cart to that wagon.

2
Equality72521 2 points ago +4 / -2

I see that you can't argue the actual merit of the horrible recommendation from his other advisors. Bannon may well have talked shit about him but he didn't hide behind smiles while working directly against him.

Oh and, by the way, Bannon's War Room was #63 on the top 100 US Apple Podcasts AS of MARCH 2020. It's easily in the top 6 of "conservative" podcasts now. So yeah, he is highly relevant. But it seems you prefer losers like Sessions, Barr and the like. To each their own I suppose.

6
jubyeonin 6 points ago +10 / -4

Federalist Society pick and shills like the ones who run this site hyping her.

4
FedUpAndReady 4 points ago +4 / -0

The right just never learns. Now we've got 4 Robertses. Wonderful.

0
NoFucks2Give 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do we KNOW for certain acb would not have dissented?

3
ontothefuture 3 points ago +3 / -0

She even said that packing the court shouldn’t happen.

58
Upupmma 58 points ago +62 / -4

HEYYYYY you watch your filthy mouth MR!!!!!

Amy Coney Barret can go through a 3 day hearing without taking any notes!

AND she has 2 black children!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(she was a cunt rino from day 1)

33
dthb4communism 33 points ago +36 / -3

White women should not have black kids

7
TheWinningNeverStops 7 points ago +8 / -1

She used those kids more as a prop. She is ironically no different then lefties.

1
Ih8leftists 1 point ago +6 / -5

They don't.

17
BasteSpuds 17 points ago +18 / -1

A country full of poor white trash kids growing up in a derelict trailer with no heat or plumbing but she went put of her way to adopt foreign children. That smacks of virtue signaling. Again like other. I was down voted for being against her.

1
Ih8leftists 1 point ago +1 / -0

What did I write for you to think I didn't know or understand this?

1
BasteSpuds 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read your thread

1
Ih8leftists 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of that replaces the fact white women do not birth black kids.

7
Junionthepipeline 7 points ago +9 / -2

The kids were the tip off.

5
FedUpAndReady 5 points ago +5 / -0

The kids should have tipped off anyone with a semblance of sense.

The pro-lockdown judgement should have tipped off everyone, sense or not.

2
Upupmma 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL the seven kids two of whom or black.

Trump got played so fucking badly.

55
antimatter 55 points ago +60 / -5

I got the shit kicked outa me on here when I reposted Robert Barnes less than thrilling critique of her. Now we know. I'm over all this shit. people are going to die now.

23
jubyeonin 23 points ago +27 / -4

Well, retards try to shit on Barnes all the time here. He always gives great and easy to understand reasons for the things he says. He's an old school civil rights and constitutionalist lawyer who has fought against the IRS. He said he doesn't trust Barrett over her decision to keep up Pritzker's lockdowns and having a record of almost pure stare decisis. I looked into it and I absolutely agreed. Took a lot of downvotes from simps and shills, but I had to put the Pritzker case out there since it also includes Jacobson as one of the reasons for the lockdown. Jacobson's decision leads the way to mandatory vaccinations.

-5
Ih8leftists -5 points ago +2 / -7

Barnes is a stand on the sidelines faggot who does nothing aside from critique those who ARE DOING. Fuck him and you, you are both worthless.

4
jubyeonin 4 points ago +6 / -2

Cry some more, leftist bitch.

1
Requiem 1 point ago +2 / -1

ACB did us in alright

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
6
antimatter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Saying he wouldn't grant relief before the case is even argued in front of them just rubs me the wrong way. WTF is the supreme court even for if they won't let one state bring a case against another in a federal election that has grave consequences for all states?

4
powershellder 4 points ago +4 / -0

Me too, which means it was likely worded poorly or created too wide of a scope.

I generally agree with Thomas (I cant think of a case where I disagreed with him, though I haven’t read about all their cases), and I lean towards trusting his judgment here.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1 (edited)
-3
Ih8leftists -3 points ago +2 / -5

Probably because Barnes is a bigger piece of shit.

6
antimatter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yet he's been right on nearly everything. Fuck off commie.

41
Reddit_is_for_cucks 41 points ago +44 / -3

I figured someone with 94 kids would be easy to blackmail.

43
jubyeonin 43 points ago +46 / -3

She has Haitian kids. Guess who had a hand in adopting out Haitian kids?

26
GreatBambino 26 points ago +27 / -1

Holy fuck.

20
MAGA01 20 points ago +20 / -0

This rung alarm bells for me early on. But I’d like to think she perhaps was saving them from future harm. I don’t know anymore.

11
jubyeonin 11 points ago +13 / -2

The Pritzker case and the shills are the biggest alarm for me. The Haitian children kinda serve a role for confirmation to me.

Who the hell would rule extended lockdowns for a common cold as constitutional and slip in a mandatory vaccination case in the decision? Why was there all this sudden support for her despite any supporting evidence and plenty of alarms? Dems not showing for a confirmation vote meant absolutely nothing. She was getting confirmed anyway since McConnell had the votes.

Hopefully, Alito and Thomas have salvaged this case, but we'll see. Prepare anyway.

7
MAGA01 7 points ago +7 / -0

Definitely odd behaviour for a so called ‘conservative’ and ‘constitutionalist’. Is she an upgrade on RBG? Probably yes. But that’s not exactly hard. It means fuck all if she’s compromised or a RINO. Anyway, yes. Please prepare. Good luck.

-5
Ih8leftists -5 points ago +1 / -6

You're a stone cold fucking idiot.

5
TwitterIsTrash 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I had 100 kids I would stand up for my beliefs. Her supposed faith should give her peace knowing they will be with God should anything go wrong. Clearly she has none.

33
You_Aint_Black 33 points ago +34 / -1

lol okay thanks got the laugh pede, I think we needed that.

Now, back to the shooting.

4
FedUpAndReady 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't waste ammo, we may now have a finite amount!

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +2 / -1

Conserve ammo at this point.

27
Dondonmondon 27 points ago +28 / -1

Everyone Trump has ever helped has stabbed him in the back. Not sure why anyone thought this would be any different.

9
Major_Nutt 9 points ago +10 / -1

He would have been better off pointing his finger at random at the crowd at rallies and selecting people for positions that way.

1
WolfRider 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. It was all a show. They are all deep state.

22
Super_degenerate 22 points ago +26 / -4

I knew that cunt was a rino from the start good to get some confirmation.

-8
Ih8leftists -8 points ago +2 / -10

Too bad for you, you aren't the President.

20
dthb4communism 20 points ago +22 / -2

You boomers downvoted me when I was critical. Wake up and look to the America First young people who know how to actually save the country instead of just being pussy liberals who believe in some libertarianism

3
NerBolanski 3 points ago +3 / -0

They hate America first because they think America first is full of Nazis and white Nationalists without realizing that America First are the group that asks the tough questions.

1
dthb4communism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Being America First is finally behaving like a rational political actor with group and individual interests. Our enemies want to attribute mal-intent to any reasonable position that we might hold to promote our interests.

0
NerBolanski 0 points ago +2 / -2

Conservatives always go for individual interests;they forget about group interests.That is why they don’t use power very well to overturn leftist policies.

1
dthb4communism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Couldn’t agree more. It’s self-defeating. GOP voters have for too long elected leaders who lead to nothing but retreat.

3
chesswhilehigh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nick Fuentes 2024.

2
Ameronaut 2 points ago +2 / -0

He'll only be 26, although the constitution doesn't matter anymore

2
chesswhilehigh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn he’s 2 years younger than me and I thought he was older than me.

-5
Ih8leftists -5 points ago +2 / -7

What EXACTLY are YOU doing, tough guy?

Nothing

7
dthb4communism 7 points ago +8 / -1

I'm attending stop the steal rallies. I'm being a good looking, tall, optical young man showing off our movement. I'm shirking the mask, and being honest to people about race/ gender/ America First foreign policy, and presenting those things with benevolence and confidence so they think they're the weirdos if they disagree. What about you, tough guy? Probably less than that.

1
Ih8leftists 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's saving America?

Being a good looking guy now saves the country.

I'm not the one bragging about being the one who knows how to save the country, that is you.

Stop sucking your own dick for five minutes and notice that you are doing nothing differently than 90% of the people on here.

0
dthb4communism 0 points ago +1 / -1

being a good looking guy saves the country

Yes

19
McDad 19 points ago +20 / -1

Kavanaugh was a gangr apist all along too. He gang raped America.

2
TheWinningNeverStops 2 points ago +4 / -2

along with the other 7.

17
deleted 17 points ago +21 / -4
-2
Ih8leftists -2 points ago +4 / -6

You would rather have Ginsburg or you just want a trophy?

-1
Major_Nutt -1 points ago +2 / -3

Ginsburg. She was honest about hating America.

13
Pelayo 13 points ago +14 / -1

The bitch had a chance to halt the anti Christian heathens at the gate and she ushered them through.

5
Junionthepipeline 5 points ago +6 / -1

Car bombs are scarier than a job in the new order

12
_fuckallofyou_ 12 points ago +16 / -4

I got so much shit for calling that whore... well a whore. She's a fucking cunt. Never liked her, anyone who carries around trophy negroes makes me sick.

-4
BladesOfSteel2020 -4 points ago +2 / -6

It might just be me, but she kind of also gives off "pedo vibes".

0
PensivePatriot 0 points ago +2 / -2

Oh please.

The judicial whiplash we’re inflicting on ourselves over ACB would be hilarious if it didn’t make us look so bad for extolling her confirmation as the saving of this nation, and her refusal to hear this case as its exact opposite.

10
deleted 10 points ago +13 / -3
10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
1
EMP2024 1 point ago +2 / -1

He and Viva are great

10
deleted 10 points ago +17 / -7
-4
Ih8leftists -4 points ago +1 / -5

Thankfully that's physically impossible. Mixed sure but straight up black isn't possible.

2
FedUpAndReady 2 points ago +2 / -0

It seems it's a dominant trait.

9
ModelMinority 9 points ago +12 / -3

What a traitoress. No loyalty, no appreciation, and no dignity

2
FedUpAndReady 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now she's there for life.

1
veteran299 1 point ago +2 / -1

and most importanty, no courage

9
Ottoandersson 9 points ago +12 / -3

"adopting" Haitian children shoulda been your first clue.

8
KeyboardWarrior45 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yep. But the problem is that it wasn’t just ACB. Fucking Kavanaugh and Gorsuch torched the Constitution too. Should have picked a fucking rooftop Korean or anti-Communist Cuban.

6
FedUpAndReady 6 points ago +6 / -0

He would have done better having a raffle at a MAGA rally.

4
KeyboardWarrior45 4 points ago +4 / -0

All the signs were there. Gorsuch had GOP establishment parents. Kavanaugh virtue signaling with his all-female clerks. ACB with her 2 Haitian adoptions even though she had many kids of her own already. All obvious red flags. Probably forgivable on the Gorsuch pick since it was his first pick. But he fucked up with the last 2 picks.

8
Alexbella 8 points ago +10 / -2

Barbara Lagoa would not have passed on hearing the PA, NC case brought to the Supreme Court BEFORE the election regarding ballots received after the election. The decision was 4-4 and was specifically brought again before the court after ACB was confirmed. She passed on the case. She could have asked for a week to review it at least.

7
outsideop 7 points ago +8 / -1

Barb was the right choice. That’s why she wasn’t chosen.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
FedUpAndReady 3 points ago +3 / -0

His first mistake was allowing himself to be advised by worm-tongued tribesmen. All subsequent mistakes have spawned from that.

I hope this non-judgement is a wake-up call to him and all of you.

5
TheEnclave89 5 points ago +6 / -1

RBG's spirit has possessed Amy Coney Barrett lol

4
UbiquityZero 4 points ago +5 / -1

Barbara Lagoya was the one Trump should’ve gone with. She knows about communism and you know damn well she along with the constitution would rule against it. But, yeah you choose establishment and you get it.

4
Chalwa222 4 points ago +6 / -2

Never trust a bitch to make a rational decision

1
Ameronaut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Based

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
1096WilCommenceAgain 3 points ago +4 / -1

RBG WAS FUCKING LOYAL TO HER SIDE WHICH IS MORE THAN I CAN SAY ABOUT ACBitch

3
Equality72521 3 points ago +4 / -1

After today I'm inclined to believe it myself.

3
dthb4communism 3 points ago +10 / -7

ALL WOMEN OUT OF POLITICS NOW

2
conservativeyuppie 2 points ago +2 / -0

So no Kayleigh or Sidney? Even discounting ACB, the other two cucked judges were men....

3
RogueLeaderX 3 points ago +5 / -2 (edited)

No! That woman actually stood by what she believed in, unlike ACB!

Sure, what she stood for was reprehensible, but she actually showed backbone and stood by it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
DoubleTrumpPumpBump 2 points ago +4 / -2

Reincarnation is real, unfortunately.

2
Pepe2016_ivotedfTD 2 points ago +2 / -0

ACB is not the problem, you are

2
Ed_Ward 2 points ago +3 / -1

Well too be fair, Trump made the massive mistake of getting a Notre Dame student.

2
Undo1913 2 points ago +3 / -1

ACB = Pope Francis with tits

2
TangerineShine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fahhhhhhhhhhhk that’s funny and sad... are these judges shills too? How is it only Alito and Thomas?

5
TangerineShine 5 points ago +5 / -0

I take it back I Trust GEOTUS, anyone who doesn’t is a shill. This lawsuit was ginned up by the left. They acted as if this was terrible news in msm, then everyone acted scared. This wasn’t the lawsuit to end all lawsuits

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
SpiroSalamar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh no!

1
DeplorableLA 1 point ago +2 / -1

No damn difference, that’s for sure.

1
TDLB 1 point ago +1 / -0

RIP to the warriors buried during the "glorious ACB" days.

Along with Barr, Mattis, Scaramucci, Kelly.

1
ifififififokiedokie 1 point ago +2 / -1

FUCKING BIT H

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Tazr671 1 point ago +3 / -2

But crochet a collar of whte feathers.

1
Malahidael 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck her, there are multiple paths to victory.

1
TakenusernameA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I havent given up on her just yet. The Texas case wasnt the end-all be-all, It getting kicked out will make the democrats think theyve won, which will make our victory all the more sweet.

1
kckilgann0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

I knew she would be just as useless.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Tazr671 1 point ago +2 / -1

And Gorsuch.

1
Meme_Too 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heck, Ginsberg did more for our Republic, by dying in time to confirm a new justice, than Barrett has done.

But there's still time to redeem herself. There's still the Trump case. If she steps up in that one, she will earn her place in history.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
obviouslytom 1 point ago +3 / -2

I am willing to be someone got to the judges and threatened them.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RenaissanceOfHope 1 point ago +2 / -1

Remember when I said that we should have Kavanaugh’ed her?

1
AngelMark 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was a private investigator, paralegal, legal secretary and I can tell you NEVER TRUST ANYONE w a LAW degree! I've met and worked with hundreds of lawyers and only knew 2 who I trust!