20 The 64 Trillion Dollar question on my mind is just WHO would have non-contestable standing under the cited Article 3? posted 127 days ago by latetotheparty 127 days ago by latetotheparty +20 / -0 The only unacceptable answer is "nobody"... This ruling had NOTHING to do with the merits of the case and 200% to do with procedural matters. 4 comments share 4 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (4) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – flaming_death 1 point 127 days ago +1 / -0 Great question. Clearly, the legislatures alone can determine how electors are chosen. Clearly, it was not legislatures that did that. So, how does that get enforced? Who has to bring the case? WHO HAS STANDING? permalink save report block reply
Great question.
Clearly, the legislatures alone can determine how electors are chosen.
Clearly, it was not legislatures that did that.
So, how does that get enforced? Who has to bring the case?
WHO HAS STANDING?