The case was new, and it came out of nowhere. Maybe they were just poking around to see what SCOTUS would or wouldn't hear. Or maybe it was a legit attempt to fix this scrambled mess of an election. Either way, the corporate media will spin this as the nail in the coffin, the game ending play. I'm sure now it will be plastered all over the corporate media news sites, maybe before I even finish typing this out. But we know this isn't the end, not by a long shot.
Think back to a couple days ago, before the Texas case was announced. The only thing that has changed between then and now, is that we have MORE Evidence of fuckery. It just keeps building, day after day. Powell, Wood, Giuliani, etc. Their cases are even more solid than they were a couple days ago. I have absolute faith that one way or another, Trump WILL be in office after January 20. We aren't going way, we aren't backing down, we will HOLD THE LINE.
SCOTUS has plenty of other election cases coming very quickly, we'll know much more after their responses to cases with completely different legal makeup and ramifications. The Texas case was audacious as all hell, brilliantly written, and for a layman like me felt very correct. Yet I think there's plenty of possibility that SCOTUS can support us against the fraud through different cases, that the Texas case was for arcane legal reasons a longshot, and that some of the cases that have been getting downplayed out of these states, or even Powell and/or Wood, might get a hearing. This isn't over yet, SCOTUS states in their order very consciously that they're saying nothing about the whole shebang yet, only the technical weakness (I gather) of the Texas case.
Yes all cases with far less grounds for standing. This case said that in the future any state can do whatever the fuck it wants, allow rampant cheating and it's fine. the kraken is useless