2804
posted ago by the_antics ago by the_antics +2809 / -5

The case was new, and it came out of nowhere. Maybe they were just poking around to see what SCOTUS would or wouldn't hear. Or maybe it was a legit attempt to fix this scrambled mess of an election. Either way, the corporate media will spin this as the nail in the coffin, the game ending play. I'm sure now it will be plastered all over the corporate media news sites, maybe before I even finish typing this out. But we know this isn't the end, not by a long shot.

Think back to a couple days ago, before the Texas case was announced. The only thing that has changed between then and now, is that we have MORE Evidence of fuckery. It just keeps building, day after day. Powell, Wood, Giuliani, etc. Their cases are even more solid than they were a couple days ago. I have absolute faith that one way or another, Trump WILL be in office after January 20. We aren't going way, we aren't backing down, we will HOLD THE LINE.

Comments (197)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Juantinntwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was on board for this case because I think there needs to be preference outlawing/banning universal mail in ballots.

This case never focused on my biggest problem with 2020 election which is widespread meddling in the election and the failure of the states in question to provide transparency in the gathering, verification, and counting of votes.

Okay, so the SCOTUS won’t get rid of mail in ballots and make this easy... what I REALLY want is for someone to FORCE those states to audit those ballots and actually listen to evidence of fraud occurring. None of us will ever accept this election if they don’t prove to us that Biden actually won this thing.

If they have nothing to hide and truly want us to COPE, then they should shut us up by verifying signatures and matches in the voter registry.