49
posted ago by LiskaEman ago by LiskaEman +49 / -0

While I'm dooming about the dismissal right now too, this guy, on Twitter, brings up a really good point: https://twitter.com/PioyCOLX/status/1337546036223619073

"Do not be distracted by the #MSM. The influence is deeper than you realize. This is apart of the process. Read the fine print. Trump's lawsuit is not dismissed, Texas was dismissed. [NOT] because anything was wrong, but due to a [TECHNICALITY]. Stay TUNED!!!!!!

If you read the dismissal on the front page, is says it's dismissed under lack of Standing under ARTICLE III OF THE CONSTITUTION! "

What is article 3, you ask? TREASON.

Section 3

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

I'm not expert enough to know to which it refers, but this could get really really interesting.

Comments (32)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
Trouble07 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, if they mentioned article III section III that would be stellar but without that its standard for lack of standing in a state vs state(s) case to use that language. Its possible they meant section III but i feel they would have sited it to quell the backlash they are getting.

2
LiskaEman [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm kinda waiting to see what's going on with it. Guy brought up an interesting point, so I just posted it here. All we can do is kinda wait and see what happens from here.

1
Trouble07 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope you are right but I have no faith in the judicial branch or the house ot the senate lol. I do have faith in the POTUS!