47
posted ago by bubble_bursts +49 / -2

I don't think so. This case was for the optics - so people can't say that SCOTUS is biased. There will be another original case, most probably against foreign representatives (CCP/Venzuela etc) that will be the deciding factor.

I don't think so. This case was for the optics - so people can't say that SCOTUS is biased. There will be another original case, most probably against foreign representatives (CCP/Venzuela etc) that will be the deciding factor.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
3
Mikon 3 points ago +3 / -0

IDK man if they didn't take a case from Texas why should they take any of the others. They don't have standing.

2
PNW_PEPE 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be honest though, if you look at this Texas case in the scope of the entire election fraud investigation, it does seem more "theatrical" than anything else. I thought they would hear it and reject. I don't know what else can happen but if this next month is anything last the past month has been, then we are in for some real shit.

2
Mikon 2 points ago +2 / -0

IDK this kinda feels like a gut punch for me. We're 70 million plus with no voice because the highest court refuses to look at our case despite mountains of evidence in every way shape and form lol. This country is headed for a breakup and it won't be pretty.

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is definitely a loss. But this is not the only suit that could be filed to the SCOTUS. I think this had the potential for the purest constitutional argument, but I am not well versed enough in constitutional law to know if there are any other legal paths.

2
Mikon 2 points ago +2 / -0

For that probably not but. Wisconsin court hearing for the Trump case was today. There's several lawsuits still filed or being considered in the other states. Gotta hold the line there. I won't give up ever. Trump hasn't conceded yet, neither should we.

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

If there is a case of Foreign Interference directly going to SCOTUS, it has original jurisdiction, and it would be very hard for them to not take it. In fact it will be accepted 9-0 if such a case comes.

But all these setsbacks, Trump can truly say "I exhausted every single fucking avenue" before he has to do what he has to do, if it comes to that.

2
Blndhairylegs 2 points ago +2 / -0

dream on... SCOTUS is chicken shit, afraid of BLM and muh disenfranchising dead and fictitious voters

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

If thats truly the case, thats fine, this will pave the way for military tribunals

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
DDragonE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you pede for keeping that energy up! We were doomy Nov 4th and got up again. Let us do the same now!

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember Nov 4th. The doomers were everywhere. RIght now we still have HIGH ENERGY here. Its great, WE WILL WIN !!

1
Maui_Boy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you’re closer to the truth

1
Redpill-notCommieRed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still have cases in the pipeline but this was the easy win that was needed. Tempers at tomorrow's rally are going to be red hot

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tempers at tomorrow's rally are going to be red hot

Trump is counting on it, DONT LET HIM DOWN !!!

1
Kckroosian 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are red hot all over the country.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
bubble_bursts [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Remember on Nov 4th? Did you think we were clutching at straws? And all the times since then things didnt go as planned ? How is this any different? In the end we will prevail, just a question of how far Trump needs to push.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Kckroosian 1 point ago +1 / -0

No I don’t. I also don’t think they realize what’s coming either.

1
Anon331717 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aren’t they gonna hear Linn Woods case at SCOTUS?

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6