992
posted ago by LogicalPatriot +993 / -1

There's something not right about it. Seems calculated. The court basically dismissed the case despite wanting the defendants to reply.

We got to see their replies as well. They were crap. No true argument. Just 'deboonked' and 'cannot proceed it actually hurt you if we cheated' rebuttals.

SCPTUS then dismissed the case on the grounds that Texas has no standing. Why even accept any statements at all if the opening appeal / complaint was to have no standing?

Besides that, I don't think this is over. Not by a long shot. The Texas case was not even the primary 'method'. Before hand, all you Pedes were oblivious to it and just fine. It came out of no where. So just go back to the original game plan! Texas's suit was basically a massive demonstration of support.

It demonstrated how fractured the country is, how dangerous things are tipping. It demonstrates that even within a single state, Legislators are at an impasse. It also demonstrated that the defendants have no counters.

This was like a giant screen. Texas's suit was the equivalent of Alexander attempting to flank the Persians, stretching the flanks of the Persian ranks until their lines finally showed a weakness.

We know the weakness now. Or at least? They do. The lefals teams still heading to SCOTUS do. It's been exposed with the sudden arrival of the Texas' Rohirrim.

I wouldn't panic right now at all. There's too many moving pieces. And SCOTUS's ruling seemed... purposefully drawn out with haste. Provoked.

I'd also like to add that the reason SCOTUS may continue to disappoint is in the language we constantly see in response- fear or Violence.

Sorry Pedes, they fear the left. But they don't fear you.

As Rudy Guiliani said recently - 'Perhaps we are too nice for our good'.

The 'government' doesn't fear you. They fear the leftists but not you.

What does that tell you, Pedes.

What does that tell you.

There's something not right about it. Seems calculated. The court basically dismissed the case despite wanting the defendants to reply. We got to see their replies as well. They were crap. No true argument. Just 'deboonked' and 'cannot proceed it actually hurt you if we cheated' rebuttals. SCPTUS then dismissed the case on the grounds that Texas has no standing. Why even accept any statements at all if the opening appeal / complaint was to have no standing? Besides that, I don't think this is over. Not by a long shot. The Texas case was not even the primary 'method'. Before hand, all you Pedes were oblivious to it and just fine. It came out of no where. So just go back to the original game plan! Texas's suit was basically a massive demonstration of support. It demonstrated how fractured the country is, how dangerous things are tipping. It demonstrates that even within a single state, Legislators are at an impasse. It also demonstrated that the defendants have no counters. This was like a giant screen. Texas's suit was the equivalent of Alexander attempting to flank the Persians, stretching the flanks of the Persian ranks until their lines finally showed a weakness. We know the weakness now. Or at least? They do. The lefals teams still heading to SCOTUS do. It's been exposed with the sudden arrival of the Texas' Rohirrim. I wouldn't panic right now at all. There's too many moving pieces. And SCOTUS's ruling seemed... purposefully drawn out with haste. Provoked. I'd also like to add that the reason SCOTUS may continue to disappoint is in the language we constantly see in response- fear or Violence. Sorry Pedes, they fear the left. But they don't fear you. As Rudy Guiliani said recently - 'Perhaps we are too nice for our good'. The 'government' doesn't fear you. They fear the leftists but not you. What does that tell you, Pedes. What does that tell you.
Comments (101)
sorted by:
69
deleted 69 points ago +69 / -0
35
LogicalPatriot [S] 35 points ago +36 / -1

'IT'S MY REPUBLIC AND I NEED IT NOW!'

Call toll free at 1-866-386-1776

Also, pucker factor at 7.1 right now.

6
commies0ride0free 6 points ago +6 / -0

Def some pucker factor happening

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Mjolnir 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lmfao

1
itsokaytobereggie 1 point ago +2 / -1

Caaaaayyysh

9
junta 9 points ago +10 / -1

877-CASH-NOW

5
TotesMehGoat 5 points ago +5 / -0

1-877-FREE-NOW

2
fauxgnaws 2 points ago +2 / -0

Allright, sweethearts, you heard the man and you know the drill! Assholes and elbows!

36
dontdrinksoy 36 points ago +37 / -1

I have an idea... TWO COUNTRIES. Conservative America, and Liberal America. Who will survive? The freedom-loving capitalists, or the dirty commies? Your guess is as good as mine.

28
LogicalPatriot [S] 28 points ago +40 / -12

Secession is actually illegal and is also what the CCP wants.

The true path here is the to actually go full on Constitution-mode and continue to call and berate your Reps and Legislators to take back their Constitutional power.

It was already ruled that they can do so at any time, without limits. SCOTUS is essentially kicking the case back after hearing the defense, to say that the Onus is still on each state. Not all legal avenues have been fulfilled. Its likely SCOTUS would not accept Texas's complaint with standing UNLESS the Election was LEGALLY OVER.

They're saying that Texas has no right to complain when the electors have not even been chosen, much less casted their votes.

We've seen the opponents defense. It's weak. Criminal trial will be easy to do as we know they have no guards against the evidence.

So let's do our jobs. Keep pressuring your appropriate officials! The Vote has not been cast!

DO. NOT. PANIC.

26
JoeIBC 26 points ago +26 / -0

Was the Declaration of Independence legal?

13
deleted 13 points ago +18 / -5
9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
4
Onedude123 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe Secession was allowed it was the United Sovereign States . Lincoln started the federal centralization of power.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
0
Bubbaguhnoose 0 points ago +4 / -4

This is a very doomer, anarchy, leftist thing to say. You're free to leave the country.

Secession should not be in the discussion now. We are not giving up our country. We are in a spiritual struggle against china, communism and the devil.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
Bubbaguhnoose 1 point ago +2 / -1

The country can't hold us hostage if we don't want to be here.

No one's keeping you here.

The point is, dont talk about secession now. That's divide and conquer shit. We're in a war with china more than ourselves. Talking about breaking up the union is too doomer.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
used_1 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is what I'm gathering as well. That there's no standing because nothing's happened yet. It rules against no claims of anything and basically says "wait" which I'm sure none of us want but at this point nothing else to do.

3
halcyondream 3 points ago +3 / -0

LOL @ wanting to live under a CCP owned oligarchy of pederasts and Satanists because "secession is illegal."

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
2
christosgnosis 2 points ago +2 / -0

splitting up is not tenable because just like Canada, these globalist will let communist China bring in troops in order to invade and take over all of North America

we have to defeat them and keep the Union together - because the CCP will finish us off if our nation becomes fractured

there is no other choice than that

2
ShampocalypseWOW 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope. The whole country is ours, and nothing left. The areas the traitors control was stolen and without their cheating methods, they'd never have gained control in the first place. We kick the traitors out or put em in the ground, we don't run or give up.

27
Suckmydick87 27 points ago +27 / -0

I just want to point something out about the two ads DJT posted on Twitter.

He posted them before the SC decision, by about an hour.

Also, neither ad says anything about the SC case, they only urge you to call your state legislature. These ads take time to produce, and funding. Why would DJT make these if he thought he was going to win in the SC?

Chew on it for a minute.

2
50red 2 points ago +3 / -1

Fuck, that's a nice heaping of cope. You're right. Both of you. Seems to be preplanned.

4
DarkestMatt 4 points ago +4 / -0

How could the plan have ever been to win the SC, given that RBG only recently officially died. What, Trump was betting the farm on a court featuring RBG? No, SC was never involved in any plan.

18
scarfacexxx 18 points ago +19 / -1

they need to fear us

17
watchman87 17 points ago +18 / -1

heres what i think. it was a calculated move, to draw the enemy out more, when they think they are winning they expose themselves. you are right it was way to fast, like why ask for the other sides opinion if they were going to dismiss. ALSO i think that the SCOTUS wants the legislature to decide, after all that is where the true power is. for many decades the united states has relied on the popular vote. FORCING the legislature to make the call places a HuUuuGE importance back on them as electors that actually choose. this is a republic they need to take their authority back if they want to keep it. bottom line. the SC knows this, and its the safest way to keep the contry together, instad of one party saying wellll look the SC was one sided so its not legit. if the legislatures choose in all the states, it spreads the issue. harder to say it wasUNCONSTITUTIONAL

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
3
TrumpParty007 3 points ago +5 / -2

I agree - it showed their hand of who is against and IT gave them time to work on other things

3
lordvon 3 points ago +3 / -0

that's true, lots of moves were made and nothing was actually lost on trump's side. i do think they did try to succeed, but not sweat if they failed.

2
watchman87 2 points ago +2 / -0

at the end of the day it all comes down to the legislators voting on who to send. it is their ultimate power they can decide

9
Kelcius 9 points ago +9 / -0

It tells me that they have no true understanding what the real Patriots are all about. Just like when the Japanese misunderstated us at Pearl harbor. One of the most dangerous things I would see is the American Patriot with nothing to lose they fear the left because they can burn a few buildings, the Patriots patience is wearing thin . we still continue to hope that's why we haven't gone off the deep end yet

8
Overeverything 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well said

8
Ronaldus 8 points ago +8 / -0

How is it a game if the result is "Game Over for the Texas Lawsuit?"

20
LogicalPatriot [S] 20 points ago +21 / -1

This was a "game theory' type of move. It showed the Defense's legal options - IE they have none.

The case was kicked back because technically, no damage has actually been done to Texan's rights yet. The Vote has not been cast and Legislators can take back their powers at ANYTIME prior to the 6th.

Texas's case was purposely timed. It was the equivalent of a Screen when talking of military maneuvers.

9
Ophelia 9 points ago +9 / -0

Tomorrows rally in DC is going to be interesting

4
Judiwont 4 points ago +4 / -0

That’s another thing I question. Like why would they release a bad ruling when they know there’s going to be so many patriots tomorrow in DC

4
TotesMehGoat 4 points ago +4 / -0

I HATE the law sometimes. So because Biden isn't in yet we can't complain about laws on the books currently causing disenfranchisement.

2
christosgnosis 2 points ago +2 / -0

you have to be murdered before anything can be done about the person attempting to murder you is what it amounts to

2
watchman87 2 points ago +2 / -0

you are right is was a smoke screen. draw the enemy out more, see their defenses. trump art of war, apear weak when you are strong. only takes one move to change it, legislators CHOOSE. the final call. they decide if there was fraud

3
Lenny_Kravitz2 3 points ago +3 / -0

That isn't how it works. SCOTUS doesn't communicate with anyone else concerning their decisions.

Trump doesn't have a line with them. They are not making decisions in coordination with Trump or anyone else. SCOTUS is essentially a neutral party that may have a bias/leaning/ideology that the members adhere to.

2
50red 2 points ago +2 / -0

How does this work with the December 14 date, which is Monday?

6
havemydata 6 points ago +7 / -1

And just like that, we're back to the Trust The Plan nonsense.

5
FTG2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

Its not trust the plan nonsense. the doom and gloom is nonsense. Everyone was fine before this case came out of nowhere. Then this case came through and everyone was hopped up on endorphins because they thought that this was it and now they are back down. just like junkies..

5
eplettner 5 points ago +5 / -0

Burn DC down tomorrow

5
jackneefus 5 points ago +5 / -0

SCPTUS then dismissed the case on the grounds that Texas has no standing.

Trump certainly has standing as an injured party. If Trump refiles the Texas lawsuit as his own, wouldn't that change the situation?

3
used_1 3 points ago +3 / -0

No injury yet because its based on things that have yet to happen, I.e. election being given to one party or another. Since it hasn't, no standing essentially

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
watchman87 4 points ago +4 / -0

agree even though this was a failure the STATES showed support for choosing electors against the fraudulent vote. this is still moving in the right direction

4
Zskills 4 points ago +4 / -0

TX lawsuit defined how the battle lines were drawn.

We have been counted. Attendance has been taken.

4
christosgnosis 4 points ago +4 / -0

and it also exposed some players in red states that are now prime suspects of being CCP collaborators or on the CCP gravy train take in some manner

4
HubriantNectarine 4 points ago +5 / -1

Op speaks the truth.

2
HubriantNectarine 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d also like to add that the reason SCOTUS may continue to disappoint is in the language we constantly see in response- fear of Violence. Sorry Pedes, they fear the left. But they don't fear you. As Rudy Guiliani said recently - 'Perhaps we are too nice for our good'. The 'government' doesn't fear you. They fear the leftists but not you. What does that tell you, Pedes.>

4
verminform 4 points ago +4 / -0

The time for wait is over.

3
Bogey 3 points ago +3 / -0

The four states literally have no evidence to counteract the core claims of impropriety. If they did, it would be in the filing.

3
ShampocalypseWOW 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's really much more simple: they get their case out there, got all the support, and got the responses from the defendants. It's all out in the open, ready to go. A MOTION was denied, not the whole case thrown out. Why? Because no injury has occurred yet. No electors have been selected. So the SCOTUS can't really grant a remedy to something that hasn't happened yet. But they sure have looked at the evidence, so once that injury DOES happen (and it's still unclear if it even will as the states in question COULD decide not to select electors or select electors for Trump, though unlikely), they are ready to weigh in on it and grant a remedy.

3
Shadowflare 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your username completely checks out. Thank you for sharing your wisdom.

3
MAGA_____bitches 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow, you smart son of a bitch

3
johndude 3 points ago +3 / -0

The court basically dismissed the case despite wanting the defendants to reply.

YES

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
FuckYouAsWell 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another oddity is that the only conservatives to dismiss were the three trump appointed.

This shows a clear intention not to play favorites. They get to “agree” with the libs that tx had no standing.

So then when the dahnald himself comes, who clearly has standing, they are justly following the laws after already gaining the lefts support.

I’m not a Qtard, I just believe the evidence of fraud will eventually legitimately end up in front of the scotus, and sadly am holding onto hope they will act appropriately.

3
GamebredPitbull 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cut the bullshit. Enough with the secret plans, conspiracy theories or Q riddles. The inconvenient truth is the SWAMP is deep as fuck and deeper than anyone expected. Everything from SCOTUS to the military is compromised. Telling people to have FAITH, BELIEVE or TRUST is asking them to GIVE UP.

Wake the fuck up, people. Every week it's loss, after loss, after loss despite the undeniable evidence, countless testimonies and whistleblowers. How many more losses do people need? Time is running out. The CCP is almost in the White house. Wake the fuck up.

3
LogicalPatriot [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

You wanna' know how Trump got to where he is?

By being positive.

It's literally a doctrine he follows.

You should try it sometime.

3
TrumpChampBelt 3 points ago +3 / -0

what one state or a group of states does affects other states. This is EXACTLY why Texas has standing.

This is EXACTLY why we had a civil war to begin with!

Our courts are full of fucking retards.

2
FTG2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

updoot for your rational post.. I agree I think it cut down on the fog of war a little bit. Not great for the optics but did expose their arguments as basically "this had been deboooooked."

The amount of emotional roller coasting that goes on here is unbelievable. The same dudes that say they want to lead in a "battle" but then cant keep their damn emotions in check. Take a step back and see the forest, not the trees.

2
ACActual 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm so sick and tired of everyone saying "We don't advocate violence" and all the others saying "Hold the line" theres a great plan.

We are fucked if you guys cant comprehend what's happened. The most powerful position in the world was STOLEN. Try Acting as if Treason just occured. This isnt a game, all of these losses arent scripting. We are losing and will lose until we either get really lucky or force everyone to FEAR US more than they Fear them.

2
eatcheese 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you're going to overturn an election, everything has to be perfect. Texas was the wrong state do it with because there were better options, such as the people of Georgia, Pennsylvania, ect.

2
KYMAGApatriot1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I truly hope you are right. My number one concern: how deeply and extensively is China involved? How many politicians do they own? And of those not owned, which ones have been threatened? Don’t laugh. After all, this is China, and they didn’t give a hoot how many of their own citizens died with the very convenient timing of their COVID bomb: election year.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
2
Judiwont 2 points ago +2 / -0

“ I wouldn't panic right now at all. There's too many moving pieces. And SCOTUS's ruling seemed... purposefully drawn out with haste. Provoked.”

What do you mean? I’d like to hear your thought process on this statement?

3
LogicalPatriot [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are 8 other suits targeting or heading to SCOTUS. 4 of them are specifically in the same 4 states filed against here and all 4 of those are ELECTION CONTEST suits. Such suits have a strong history of actually being taken and reviewed by SCOTUS. Such a case is how Bush vs Gore finally made it to SCOTUS.

On top of all this, Sinday and Linwood along with Flynn in the background and all these new witnesses and reveals, are showing ever more fraud, exposing the system more, we are finding more connections to compromised deep state (such as GA Gov and SoS), corrupt and or compromised Dems being exposed, Dems are buckling under pressure and making self sabotaging comments (Drunken Pelosi).

Every time we have a big reveal, a big defeat comes around to make us humble again.

It really does feel like an Art of War situation where they let the defeats play out after HUGE reveals in order to put the Dems back into a sense of safety again.

This Texas case was the first major time that they were openly admitting Trump was going to win or had better than a 50% chance.

Even the footage from Fulton Co didn't get that response from the Dems becaus they would be like 'well if we lose GA, it's ok. We still won't. But every single reveal from all these moving parts has worn down not just Pedes, but also the Left.

The SCOTUS ruling was pressured heavily. Trump himself intervened and the primary focus was about utilizing US, THE PEDEA to CALL UPON OUR Reps to get them to go into action! AND IT WORKED pedes! It worked! We even flipped Alaska's original position! All that pressure likely helps force SCOTUS to make a decision sooner rather than later as planned (about 24 to 48 hours what I heard yesterday from a Constitutional lawyer). So after the Dems were completely exposed and threatened - time to pull it back. We ate a big loss today but that loss was necessary.

To be clear, this is not a giant plan. This is definately a 'plan as you go' situation but the point is that the plan is being made and followed as time goes. This lawsuit was coordinated on purpose. Just like Hearings which everyone claims are pointless - they're not. It was to put out in public view what going on. Remember we are fighting the Media here. You think Media is going to be honest and pull in a legal expert on election law and have them describe 41 previous cases for authority? No, of course not. But the Texas suit did! Lol

Never fear that we do have smart people in big positions. It's a. Giant chess match. Every move is calculated. Maybe not ahead of time, but still calculated.

3
ObamasLooseButthole 3 points ago +4 / -1

His thought process is "C O P E"

3
LogicalPatriot [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's not much for me to COPE. I'll be honest, I didn't even vote for Trump.

But I support his bid. So,... yeah. Go doom somewhere else.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
christosgnosis 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're right. Texas doesn't have standing.....

And that is complete BS, because the fact is that the defendant states already failed to abide by the constitution in how they conducted their votes - and that would be absolutely provable

The failure of states (actin in a conspiracy) to conduct elections according to the strictures of the constitution disenfranchises the other union compact states

the constitution is a contract between the union compact of states - there really is no party of higher standing in any matter concerning the constitution than a state

2
Numpties 2 points ago +2 / -0

More reptiles, roaches and schiff stains are being exposed as time trickles by.

Some encouraging words:

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1337548142196129792

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
shadows_of_the_mind 2 points ago +4 / -2

TrUsT tHe pLaN gUyS

2
Donald_Gear_Solid 2 points ago +3 / -1

Sidney Powell has not tweeted on this. I guess I was wrong, maybe they were shills all along.

2
One-Man_Riot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Neither did Trump. Is he a shill, too, dumbfuck?

2
Flybythesun 2 points ago +2 / -0

why is it that the left does not fear the most armed and organized and most patriotic people? because we lack courage

2
SyNiKaLiTy 2 points ago +2 / -0

They don't want to see what happens when 1776 gets activated. It'll make the BLM riots look like a preschool fight.

2
Shaffro 2 points ago +2 / -0

A squeaky wheel gets oiled. Keep the pressure on, patriot Pedes.

2
VikingPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

This.

2
DrDeathAndTaxes 2 points ago +2 / -0

So Texas hold’em

2
Sherlocks_Pocket 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks a very thought provoking analysis Pede

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-2
AtariArtist -2 points ago +2 / -4

Game Over.