Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
I think they shot it down in initial release as a trial balloon for the purpose of surveying the signals coming of places like us here at theDonald.win to check if they were lucky enough to find begrudging acceptance among us, by the sampling they took here. They came away horrified to see they are unleashing civil war and so now are saying “look haha....loooooook...guyyys.....we just need it presented to us differently.... haha....I mean come on, that is all we are saying.”
Am I supposed to give a fuck what they want? We could be in the capitol, building our republic back up to what it should have been from scratch by the time this is worked on. The SCOTUS had their chance and they fucked up. They'll swing with the rest.
From what I can surmise is that what was presented to the SCOTUS, had some conflicts or some words/statements that didn't make their point across so if they modify their intentions that would make sense enough for SCOTUS to accept, SCOTUS will hear it this time around.
Texas didn’t suffer injury, that’s why they dismissed it. But Trump and the electors who intervened did. So if they file then I believe it can be heard. It would still have to start at district level, because the origination of the case couldn’t be scotus (with Texas it was because it was between two states) and then it would have to move its way back there
This is bullshit. No difference between motion to file and motion for leave to file. They mean the same thing.
The difference will be that the plaintiffs coming up through the courts will have standing, and the Supreme Court will be able to reach the merits of the argument, which is strong.
I don’t a speak bullshit. What she be saying
If they're allowing this bureaucratic legal fluff and time wasting to get in the way of truth and justice then they've made their intensions clear.
I don't speak legalese, but I'd be curious to hear a lawyer pede comment.
I just PM.ed the guy who is stickied (Lawyer dude)
you're a gentleman and a scholar
This is the roadmap laid out by Alito and Thomas
I think they shot it down in initial release as a trial balloon for the purpose of surveying the signals coming of places like us here at theDonald.win to check if they were lucky enough to find begrudging acceptance among us, by the sampling they took here. They came away horrified to see they are unleashing civil war and so now are saying “look haha....loooooook...guyyys.....we just need it presented to us differently.... haha....I mean come on, that is all we are saying.”
Neh. Tbh I do not believe even that.
So they'll add two words and then back to the very same people, who shot down the first one. Is that "The Plan", now?
I need a fucking Valium
You can say that again.
I need a fucking valium. There. And a drink. And a hooker. Just kidding about that last part.
This is similar to what Rudy said on Newsmax after the scotus news came out
Am I supposed to give a fuck what they want? We could be in the capitol, building our republic back up to what it should have been from scratch by the time this is worked on. The SCOTUS had their chance and they fucked up. They'll swing with the rest.
ELI5
From what I can surmise is that what was presented to the SCOTUS, had some conflicts or some words/statements that didn't make their point across so if they modify their intentions that would make sense enough for SCOTUS to accept, SCOTUS will hear it this time around.
Oh gee, right. This is stupidly technical.
Can we confirm this some other way?
Need this broken down Barney style.
Texas didn’t suffer injury, that’s why they dismissed it. But Trump and the electors who intervened did. So if they file then I believe it can be heard. It would still have to start at district level, because the origination of the case couldn’t be scotus (with Texas it was because it was between two states) and then it would have to move its way back there
How tf does lady know?
God, please.
Need confirmation on this!!!
If true, then Ken Paxton should be on it
This is bullshit. No difference between motion to file and motion for leave to file. They mean the same thing.
The difference will be that the plaintiffs coming up through the courts will have standing, and the Supreme Court will be able to reach the merits of the argument, which is strong.
Sounds Good !!
What in the?
Please please please
That's some solid coping.